Showing posts with label Dr. Paul Thomas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dr. Paul Thomas. Show all posts

Sunday, May 12, 2024

PEDIATRICIAN DR. PAUL THOMAS: We were losing a million dollars, over a million dollars, in vaccines that were refused

Here is the complete interview.

Vaccine-specific income to a pediatric practice number one is the admin fee think of this as a thank you for giving this shot it's rationalized by the following they say well pediatricians spend a lot of time talking about vaccines they need to be reimbursed the truth of the matter of what most pediatric practices do they give you a one-sheet glossy from the CDC that's called a vis vaccine information sheet you hand it to the patient when they go into the office the nurse gives it to them and that's your education so it's actually taking a zero physician time and Physicians will dodge vaccine questions so really it's just a thank you for giving the shot and you get about it depends on the insurance company every contract is different but I would average it out to say about $40 for the first antigen and $20 for each subsequent antigen so let's just say a 2-month baby visit

Thursday, May 9, 2024

Pediatricians are paid to vaccinate children.  Most interesting about this was that the guy said "We get kickbacks of up to $240 per visit.  Many of the kickbacks, the incentives, the punishments, the disincentives, for not getting kids vaccinated, are running through insurance companies.  This is Dr. Paul Thomas, a Dartmouth-trained pediatrician can pediatricians even afford to run their medical practices without the kickbacks they get for vaccinating every child?  Well, Dr. Paul Thomas,  said you can't stay in business if you're not giving pretty close to the CDC's vaccination schedule.  He ran a general pediatric practice.  He had 15,000 patients, and he had 33 staff members, so he knows what he's talking about.  He wrote a book, called The Vaccine-Friendly Plan:  Dr. Paul's Safe and Effective Approach to Immunity and Health from Pregnancy Through Your Child's Teen Years, 2016.

Our doctor just had a fit that we weren't on fluoridated water.  We're not going to do that.  I knew better than that.  

Tuesday, August 1, 2023

Here is the direct link to the interview with Dr. Paul Thomas and Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay.  

You are the director of Toxicology and molecular biology for Toxicology Support Services your background is in Biochemistry that was one area where I struggled with because I just tried to memorize my way through and you probably really understood it.  But you've worked at the Cancer Center there you got over 30 years of scientific experience in the area of Toxicology which is so important in our world today and you've been involved in vaccine work in the past specifically some concerns that you have about the COVID vaccine and how it might be affecting the reproductive system of individuals who get that shot let's jump off there what are your concerns?

4:57. Of course the first thing is that these have not been studied for any length of time that is suitable to determine the true harms that could come from using this technology which is gene therapy.   We've gotten to calling them the genetic vaccines.  They do have a vaccine technology in a manner that you are asking in your body to attack the immunogen that you're hijacking your cells to make based on the sequence that is injected in and travels to all the cells in your body.  The problem is is that it travels to all the cells in your body, and it crosses the blood brain barrier.  We see from the Pfizer bio-distribution that was obtained in a FOIA request from Japan that the lipid goes to really every compartment of the body but the endocrine glands and the bone marrow preferentially: so, the pituitary, spleen, the pancreas, the ovaries, the testes, and it takes up residence there in those cells.  And, of course, whatever cell takes up the genetic message will then start producing the spike protein, and all of these vaccines instruct the body to produce the spike protein and to display it on the surface of the cells.  But then we are also wanting our body to attack the spike protein to develop an immunological response, and the logical result of that is that we are asking our body to destroy the cells that are displaying the spike protein all over our bodies.  If those are preferential in the testes or the ovaries, there's a huge problem.  With that the Moderna bio-distribution study which is hidden in the pharmacokinetics section of their application to the EMA shows the same thing although they only used male rats.  So they do show the message going to the testes.  Now these experiments would take a day at most, and after they got this message going to the testes, do you think they set up another experiment with 5 or so female rats to see if it also went to the ovaries?  No, they didn't.  No they did not.  Why?  Why did they not do this?  And the other really weird part about the Moderna submission to the EMA and their studies is that they found lymphocytopenia they found thymic embolution.  They found a splenomegaly.  A 30% reduction in T cells following the administration of the vaccine.  And after every one of these things where they also found thrombosis, increase in clotting indicators . . . after all of these they said but we don't feel that this is relevant to humans.  But we don't feel that this is . . . without the second part of that statement what should have been, "because of X, Y, and Z."  Very weird.  

Bypassed ongoing animal studies basically introduced to a human population without any real long-term look about what this might mean.

Absolutely.  And they use the wrong species to study the wrong in points.  It's really only appropriate to use primates in your final studies in order to try to approximate what might happen in humans, unless you're going to use humans as a guinea pig, which it seems exactly what they are doing and had intended to do. Doctor's word in Eden doctors Roxanna Bruno and myself have been very concerned that there would be a cross reaction because they share a lot of the amino acids similarities similar to the spike protein and the reason it has been chosen is the immunogen and that is the only similarity between humans and Old World primates they did the reproductive studies in rodents well this isn't going to tell us anything because they don't have the same since it and protein and we did see in that study from Singapore that every single one of the 15 women that were examined and it had received the Pfizer vaccine developed Auto antibodies to hurt one's own

 

Thursday, April 13, 2023

"Vaccination does not account for the impressive declines in mortality that we saw in the first half of the 20th century"

Quote #1 

Vaccination does not account for the impressive declines in mortality that we saw in the first half of the 20th century.  Nearly 90% of the decline in infectious disease mortality among U.S. children occurred before 1940 when few antibiotics or vaccines were available.  from Pediatrics 

Quote #2 

This study shows smallpox mortality declined before the vaccine was introduced.  from NCBI.

Quote #3

Vaccine injury lawsuits.  Oral polio vaccine which was responsible for causing every domestic case of paralytic polio in the U.S. after 1979.  Even though the risk of getting polio from the vaccine had become greater than the risk from the wild virus.  And even though an alternative, inactivated polio vaccine was available, the FDA in 1984 declared that "any possible doubts, whether or not well-founded about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist in view of the need to assure that the vaccine will continue to be used to the maximum extent consistent with the nation's public health objectives." 

That reminds me of the censorship and suppression that's been going on these days.  


OMG.  Adam Schiff, pre-COVID, had written a letter to the CEOs of Facebook, Google, and Amazon, demanding that they do more to stop information that might lead parents to conclude that trickily following the CDC's schedule wasn't in the children's best interest.  So the criteria wasn't if the information isn't truthful or not, but will it help us in our policy goals or not?


Friday, October 22, 2021

Antibodies will protect you from the disease, but will cause auto-immune disease

The toxicity of the mRNA is due to all of the manipulation of the molecule.  It’s a completely not-natural system.  They’ve created this monster messenger RNA molecule that pretends to be human by changes that they made in the mRNA that normally would be a virus mRNA, they turn it into a human mRNA.  That’s very important because that means it misses the signals.  Usually, when a cell receives a viral messenger RNA, it knows it’s a virus and reacts to it with an appropriate response.  But this is super-super stealth because it goes past the mucosal barriers, past the blood barriers, directly into the muscles.  It’s this strange mRNA that looks human, it gets taken up by the cells . . . .   it’s been designed so well, not only to be able to make spike protein really quickly, they’ve manipulated it so as to do that.  But they’ve also manipulated it so that it can’t break down.  So they’ve made it very sturdy.  Normally, enzymes outside the cells would have completely disintegrated the mRNA before it would have ever got inside.  So they have to put in this toxic, synthetic, cationic lipid which is really toxic to the cells and causes them to get very upset and acts like aluminum in many of the vaccines.  People are familiar with aluminum as an adjuvant, something that irritates the cells because it has to draw in the immune cells to get that antibody response to work.  So the muscle cells are really hit hard by this monstrous toxic stuff that is packaged up with this polyethylene glycol, and patianic lipid, and crazy mRNA that’s been altered so that many of the nucleotides are not even natural nucleotides.  I mean it’s really, really mucked around with so as to make it capable of making lots and lots of spike proteins in a hurry and resisting getting broken down. 

Nanoparticles make the mRNA stealthy so that it passes through the normal defenses of the immune system. 

That’s correct.  In fact, it looks enough like an LDL particle.  If you’re familiar with an LDL particle, that’s the classic LDL particle, “O, gosh, you’ve got high LDL . . . you should take a cholesterol-lowering drug.”  They make this to look like an LDL particle; they carefully designed it to look like an LDL particle.  And that means it gets taken up through natural mechanisms by many cells.  It’s not even like the ACEII receptor, which the virus is specific to the ACE II receptor.  That’s not the case here.  It can just go right into the natural endocytosis. 

It’s designed with that cationic lipid to open up like a flower and release those mRNA molecules really to go boom, boom to start making that spike protein.  But the cell can’t turn it off.  It doesn’t have any mechanisms to turn it off because the whole thing has been designed in that way.  It’s very clever engineering with the goal of producing extremely high antibody response to the spike protein which it succeeds royally at.  It does a very good job of making extremely high number of spike protein antibodies.  Which is not a good idea because high antibody levels leads to autoimmune disease.  It’s much, much higher, in fact, ten times higher than what you get from a natural infection. 

As a pediatrician, he’s always been the higher antibody response the better, but I sure noticed that when I was doing the measles, mumps, rubella titers, or MMR, that there were titers off the wall in some kids and it didn’t seem to be a good thing.  It seems like for COVID, this SARS-COV2 virus, the natural body defense mechanisms are antibody-based as much. 

Right.  No, that’s very interesting, in fact, there was a nice study that looked at the antibody response to different degrees of illness.  So people who got COVID, who tested positive, didn’t have any symptoms versus people who tested positive and ended up in the hospital and died.  You know, in these extreme cases, people reacted very differently to the virus.  They looked at the antibody response in those different degrees of disease, and they found that systematically, the highest antibody response occurred in the most devastating disease states.  And the ones who had practically no reaction also got no antibodies.  So the antibodies are an adaptive response that kicks in when the innate immune system fails.  And the innate immune system fails when it is exposed to glyphosate.  This is what I've been saying.  Glyphosate has been wrecking our immune system.  And that's why the U.S. is having so much trouble controlling COVID-19.  We have a remarkably high death rate.  Across the globe, our death rate from COVID is 4 times as high as the average.  We're not doing well, and that's because we're fat, we've got diabetes . . . .  Those are conditions that are risk factors for COVID and also caused by glyphosate.  

12:30  Concerned about antibody-dependent enhancement, what they call ADE.  This is showing up in vaccinated people once antibodies start to fade.  Can you explain what this is and whether you see any evidence that this is happening with these mRNA vaccines?

Yes, this is a very serious concern, and people--many experts--are raising the alarm about the possibility that this is going to happen.  And so far, the news has been good news.  Now they're saying that the vaccine doesn't really protect you from getting infected.  They're seeing that, they're admitting that.  "You still get infected, you still spread disease, but the good news is that your disease is mild.  It's going to reduce your symptoms.  That's what they're telling people now that it's going to reduce your symptoms, not because it's going to stop the spread of COVID but weaken it.  We're starting to see warts in that idea, and there are experts who've suspected that this was going to happen.  And there are studies that show that vaccine-based antibodies start out sky-high, really good antibodies, meaning that they'll protect you from the disease.  It'll cause auto-immune disease at the same time but never mind that.  The antibodies start falling very rapidly with the vaccine; whereas you get the disease and recover, your antibody levels start out much lower but fades very slowly.  After about 6 months, the vaccinated no longer have that protection.  "Now booster shot, everybody; every 6 months get a booster shot."  There's also the problem of the resistant strains: the Delta strain.  Practically all of the cases are Delta now in America.  That happened very quickly.  The antibody-dependent enhancement, ADE, is very interesting.  Because as the antibodies fall--there's basically two kinds of antibodies: ones that protect from disease, and ones that enhance disease.  And what happens is that the ones that protect fall faster than the ones that enhance disease.  And you reach a cross-over point where if you've been vaccinated, all of sudden, you're starting to see worse disease as a result of the vaccine compared to no vaccine at all.  Non-neutral antibodies attach to the virus and then they are the thing that hooks up to the receptor on the cell.  Fc gamma receptors.  And so they facilitate viral entry through different pathways from the H2 receptor, and it comes, the virus multiplies, and it spreads.  And they also form these conglomerates of viruses plus this antibody that produces a very strong immune response, and this is the cytokine storm problem that we see where are these too many toxic things being released by the cells that are trying to kill the viruses which cause collateral damage on the tissue so you get lung damage that is associated with severe disease.  So I am predicting, and I hope I am wrong, that we're going to have a rough time in the fall as so many people have their antibody levels waning.  And people are going to be scrambling to get booster shots and you can't just keep on keeping those antibodies really high because you're going to end up with nasty auto-immune diseases.  

18:00  Hospitals in Israel had an outbreak of Delta, 96% vaccinated among patients and staff.  The indexed case was a fully vaccinated person who came in with symptoms; nobody thought it was COVID, of course, because everybody thought, you know, he's vaccinated, therefore he couldn't have COVID.  So he's spreading it around and nobody's noticing that he's got COVID.  So by the time they recognized the indexed case, they knew they had a big problem.  A quarter of patients got COVID; most were vaccinated.  There were two patients who got COVID who were unvaccinated.  They had mild disease.  Five patients died who were fully vaccinated, so it's not like you were protected from severe disease.  That didn't happen.  

That sounds almost like the Vietnam Paper as well.  

Antibodies fade much more slowly.  The virus consists of other things besides the spike proteins.  T-cells become memory cells.  The Delta variant cells.