Andrew Bridgen.

EM Burlingame.

Crypto Rich. 

8:49.  My Grave concern is that without the Lord's and without the king you've got one third of your power structure your constitutional power structure that is obviated and missing the very one that's required to have the capacities historically constitutionally prerogatives to cut the tops off those steriles when they become corrupted and it is my genuine belief that Rupert low and his party are being used to provide or sustain the illusion that Parliament has real power that Parliament on its own without the executive can fix these problems when all of these problems in direct inverse proportion have Arisen over the last several centuries that the nobility has been reduced.

9:42.  That's true. Tony Blair got rid of the hereditaries . . . 

. . . the last, the remaining . . . 

Well, no.  There's still a number in the House. They were then elected by ballot of the hereditaries.  There was a rump, and they're being got rid of now .  What most people what I believe happened and most people don't know is the reason why Tony Blair got rid of the hereditaries in the early noughties and I believe that the Barons instigated under Magna Carta that the crown had to forfeit their right to legitimate rule for signing us into the European Union and the Maastricht Treaty.  I believe that then Tony Blair serving his Masters took his revenge on the Lord's by getting rid of the hereditaries and now what we've got we've actually got is a house of cronies because people get on in politics in the game of politics and that if you want to play politics you get on by not doing what's good for your people who voted for you and you're supposed to represent but by doing what's good for your party and then they reward you by putting you in the House of Lords so you've actually you know we've actually got most of the people in the house of Lords are the least deserving and hence when all these crimes against the people have been committed and one could go as far as to say hi they've been silent.

11:26.   Yes yes well this goes back the last great time the Lord's and their people stood up they were slaughtered in vast numbers in World War I I specifically to do away with them as an obstacle for the industrialist and the bankers because what what was what is the one and true counter to these extractive financialists system is strong capable Lords who are self-sufficient on their lands and their Estates who have worked out the complexities of the relationships such that they have the loyalty of their people and thereby can raise arms against the tyrannical government.

12:03.  Okay well I've got a different solution to that problem now I mean it's clear to me that the current system of government that we have in the UK and most of the so-called developed world and certainly the anglosphere that's influenced by the Westminster system that system doesn't work to protect the people it's a system set up for the elites

Riveting talk @NakedHedgie @TFL1728 @CryptoRichYT @PrometheanActn "It is wonderful watching geniuses at work." https://t.co/8E094SKAcO

— Steve Cage (@SteveCageauthor) August 30, 2025

But it seems that they're going to start official hearings on freedom of speech and censorship in the UK.  This is going to be, I think, an important story because the censorship, the repression, in the UK is off the charts.  --Alex Krainer

In a period of 130 years, during which the British were in control of India, India endured 33 major famines, and then since the British left India, not a single one since 1947.   --Alex Krainer

Because what's happening now is the weaponization of populations, the weaponization of new migrants as a way of assaulting and destroying British culture, English culture, indigenous culture.  --Crypto Rich

The whole thing is a complete and other s*** show, and it drives me up a wall.  It's insane.  This is what we're talking about when Susan [Kokinda] invokes the British system.  This is what she's talking about.  --Tom Luongo

What you described at the beginning in terms of the increasing austerity in terms of the British population itself, this is the nature of a parasitical system of a parasitical imperial system. When it loses its ability to loot elsewhere, then it's going to have to turn more and more and more towards its own population in order to extract what it needs to continue to feed the financial Empire.  --Susan Kokinda

8:18.  People want hysterical and I thought how strange is that why is this why are they Brits so hysterical about this when you know they always consistently pretend that they're the junior partners and that they follow along and that they follow along and all these stupid misadventures that the Americans drag them into.  And so you would expect that when the Americans announce that they're going to withdraw from Afghanistan that the Brits would be relieved, like "enough of that disaster." No they were insane.  They started giving all these speeches in Parliament insulting the United States.  Dominic Raab, who was the foreign minister, he was "Oh, the Americans, you know, we had to drag them into World War I kicking and screaming and they turned up way late for World War II, and now they're cutting and running in Afghanistan."  

This was highly illuminating! https://t.co/xY8lJaPpVL

— Alex (Sasha) Krainer (@NakedHedgie) May 31, 2025

EM Burlingame

PREVIEW

Continental Europeans control the Bank of England.  They have since its creation.

It's always about the theft of the commons, and how do you financialize them use those as collateral.  It's a backdoor way of going around the Brexit Referendum.

It's Continental wealth and power using it ownership of parliamentarians in the Parliament. 

For all intents and purposes the city of London has been the headquarters for the Dutch East Indian company for 360 years.  

What was the Marshall Plan?  Who paid for that?  Oh, and by the way, 7% of that had to be immediately paid to MI6 and the CIA.  That's actually in the Marshall Plan documentation.  Our history about our people and time at all has been spied this occupying force, then retold and retold and retold, so that we don't really know our own history, our own story, our own reality.  

They believe that they have the absolute right to enslave everybody to serve them do you think that we actually defeated the slave mind no we just force them to be more sophisticated more clever.

The English are a bloody brilliant people.  We are a wonderful people we are a civilization.  Let's just remember that.  Let's get back to that.  If we can get back to that, it's a couple simple principles.  You just sum them up very nicely.

TRANSCRIPT

Rich opens with a reference to a podcast EM did with Luongo, Episode #216: EM Burlingame and How to Kill the Financial Kill Chain of Europe, May 1, 2025. 

Ukraine didn't pick this fight.  They're not a sovereign actor.  It's never been a sovereign nation because of the ways the great powers have carved up the world. 

Someone desperately wants WWIII.  They absolutely, desperately want WWIII.  Now that we know that, and accept that, no, this is about the big collapse of the West and how to sell it to their own people.  That's what this is about, and who is going to come out on top after the war is over.  But make no mistake, the whole phrase, "Build Back Better," well, build back better after what?  Certainly wasn't COVID.  Certainly wasn't COVID.  It was a collapse of the Western financial system, the post-WWII, Bretton Woods institutions, and post-Bretton Woods governments rolled up into the post-Bretton Woods transnational institutions.  That's what they're prepping for, and they know that the only way to get through that is to send everybody to war, because what does war do?  Does war create?  No.  War destroys.  It destroys economies, it diverts capital to destructive capacities.  Oh, yeah, the GDP numbers look great, but all you're doing is aggregating spending.  So we go into deficits,  and we spend a lot of money building bombs to destroy each other.  You can play accounting tricks and bamboozle people with statistics,  

4:10  Why did Xi Jinping organize a call with Zelenskyy? It's the same reason why he's been organizing calls with everybody, which is to stop WWIII.  Because China and Russia both understand that the path to winning, not having a world war, is to draw this thing out as long as possible where they don't have to be drawn into it directly any further than they already are.  Because that's what the Russians have been doing.  This is part of the reason why the Russians have left an open area in Bakmut to allow more stuff to come in to destroy.  How do we grind up NATO's assets and give them the appearance that they have a chance at ousting us from the center of Ukraine?  Well, very simple: you make it look like you're incompetent.  Because that's the way it's been sold to the neocons.  I look at American media, and I look at American foreign policy wonks, and they all under a particular impression and that is that Russia doesn't know how to wage war in Ukraine.  Now, this is ahistorical, moronic on the face of it, then again this is what they're trying to sell to everyone.  Then there's the discord league or the new Pentagon Papers, and it's very clear what the biggest embarrassment was there.  Again, all of this is downstream from those leaks.  What did those leaks tell the world?  That the Dept. of Defense, the Pentagon, and the State Department were feeding the Foreign Policy decision-makers in the United States poorly sourced, open-sourced intelligence about the war in Ukraine.  And taking verbatim as gospel truth, handed down from the mount himself, God himself, the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense.  And they're writing policy based on this, and they don't actually need or care about the truth.  They just have a policy that they're on autopilot.  What have I been saying for the last 3 years?  These people have a policy and they're on autopilot since the opening of COVID.  So why are we surprised by this?  It's a good thing that Zelenskyy actually took the call from Xi Jinping.  Because what it also signifies, last point, is that Zelenskyy is comfortable enough now in his own skin, that he can have that call and not be lynched.  Because remember, he did go through a big purge of a lot of people a few months ago.  So, yes, I think the Pentagon leaks were also --they weren't talking to us, meaning the U.S.--they were talking to the Russians and the Chinese.  The Pentagon is like "We don't want to do this.  Get in there and stop this thing." That's the big message I took away from what was leaked because 90% of it we already knew.  So, now, what does it signify?  Who is it speaking to in the game of realpolitik and, of course, across the communications gap?  

7:40, CryptoRich I wonder if some of the antiwar forces in the U.S. establishment also made it easier for Zelenskyy to have that call with China.

8:00, Krainer.  I think presumably we would have to be guessing here.  In one of Ray McGovern's interviews with Judge Andrew Napolitano, he said, "I think this is coming straight from [JCS Chairman] Mark Milley, or somebody very, very close to him."  And there was another general who was second in command at the Pentagon, unfortunately, I forget his name now, who in pretty strong terms reiterated that we don't want this to end up in a nuclear war.  Now, why is a faction of people in the West so desperate to continue down this road that is hopeless.  No one dreams any more than that they can prevail in Ukraine.  Why are they persisting?  And I think that the answer is that they are literally in the fight for their lives.  So, I always go back to what George Soros said at last year's Davos gathering when he said that this is a conflict between two government systems.  Soros said that it's between open societies versus closed societies, but it's actually the empire versus the rest of society.  And by empire, it's the imperial governance system, which is basically economic colonialism that wants to engulf the whole world.  And then you have essentially two economic-military-political powers that are capable of saying no and pushing back, which are Russia and China.  And for the empire, this could be sunset.  This could be the end of the road because they no longer have a new host.  And if China and Russia manage to maintain their alliance, then there's no way for the Western empire to prevail here.  And I believe that the alliance will preserve here because if you look at the way . . . I think Tom here was very right in saying that Ukraine didn't pick this fight.  And we mentioned Mentriarish, after the coup,