DR. DAVID WURMSER: The actual operations of [Islamic warfare] are decentralized and therefore deniable. It's murky between influence, dissembling, terrorism, attack. You can't quite . . . the lines are really blurred. So I defy people to come up with a series of five major battles between

Thank you to John Guandolo. 

ISLAMIC WARFARE @Wurmserscribit The Muslim Brotherhood is a carbon copy of Islamic warfare from its beginning. Expansion across the Levant and North Africa in the first two centuries occurred through subversive, decentralized, and deniable action under ideological unity—not major battles. What the West calls lone actors are foot soldiers operating within a coded structure whose architects know exactly what will follow. Securing America with Frank Gaffney 10.27.26: Watch the full discussion here on 𝕏

— Frank Gaffney (@frankgaffney) October 28, 2026

David Wurmser.

What we have to understand about the Brotherhood is it's a, it is an Islamic organization.  And by that what I really mean is, you know, it's stunning when you look at the universities in the United States what they study in Middle East studies and you see analysts at the Pentagon and everywhere else studying Islam they're very good at telling you that the 32nd division of Assad's forces was whatever.  But there's almost nothing written on the Islamic way of warfare from its Inception.  And when you look at the Islamic way of warfare, when you study the Islamic way of warfare from its inception, what emerges is a carbon copy of the Muslim Brotherhood.  It is an Ambiguously ideologically . . . the ideology is the organizational structure of unity.  The actual operations of it are decentralized and therefore deniable.  It's murky between influence, dissembling, terrorism, attack.  You can't quite . . . the lines are really blurred.  So I defy people to come up with a series of five major battles between Christianity and Islam that explained the meteoric rise of Islam and its first 200 years across the Middle East and wiping out the Cradle of Christian civilization in the Levant and in North Africa.  You can't find any pitched battles.  It's all this sort of subversive warfare.  So if you understand Islamic Warfare and it's strategic imagery that way, all of a sudden you understand what exactly the Muslim Brotherhood is about, which is it is a frontal assault by the Islamic world with an ideological Unity that we in the west don't feel comfortable judging.  Because we believe anybody has the right to their opinion.  It's action that's the problem.  But when the opinion becomes part of the action, when the opinion becomes the unifying operational structure of terrorists and then they say, "Well, I'm only a cleric. I can't, you know, so some lunatic went and shot up a church or synagogue, well I mean he's a lunatic so how are you going to hold me accountable?" That is the form of warfare.  That is the operational structure.  There's a coded language, a coded atmosphere, context that is provided for these "lone wolves," which are really not lone wolves.  They are really foot soldiers that know exactly what they're doing and the ideological core, those who are defining the ideological core, know exactly what they will do.  And we in the West are not built to understand Warfare that way.