JOHNNY VEDMORE: Resets Are a Consequence of Technological Paradigm Shifts. Courage Is the Cure

every country on earth will purge the left of their party down to the bare bones to move it to the center.  Every left-wing party will get purged, move it all to the center.  Then the right to compete has to move to the center, too.  You're left with one big blob, two extremes you can paint as weirdos, idiots, and extremists that you can fight against really easy and manufacture consent, while you have this big intelligence blob in the center.  Yet there's no political solution in the center.  All the political solutions are on the left of politics, or the right of politics, so it's something that is just a stopgap between a free world, a democracy that we lived in, the idea of a free world, and what will be the overarching technology.  --Johnny Vedmore

that will be the state of humankind until humans overthrow the technocratic panopticon, which will happen because everything rises and everything falls.  And [entropy?] exists everywhere, including within social orders.  That is a fact.  They know it to be so too.  --Johnny Vedmore 

Resets are a Consequence of Technological Paradigm Shifts - @JohnnyVedmore on Courage is the Cure with @RobynRJS https://t.co/iYOuh7Rbn6

— Johnny Vedmore (@JohnnyVedmore) August 1, 2025

00:00.  Resets, these sort of resets that we are talking about, essentially these are technologically driven.  If you go back to machine guns and the creation of Gatling Guns and the creation of machine gun technology, the creation at the same time of Bio Warfare technology, and other technologies, like submarine technology, early flight Zeppelin technology.  Well, that reset we call World War 1, and afterwards we got the Treaty of Versailles, which wrote down the rules of the New World Order.  And from that point on as a new world order started to develop and by the 1930s that attempt to develop it had obviously caused issues.  But it was another technological issue come in.  Einstein had already predicted the cracking of the atom, and that that would cause a massive amount of explosion.  Seeing that they were all looking for bombs for the next big war, seeing as they knew that they could still dominate in this world where machine guns . . . .  World War I was a big eye opener to a lot of these guys.  They realized it doesn't matter, they can kill as many people as they can and warfare allows them to test things on people.  And so by the time it got to World War II that was really not only the advances in other weapons technology but really it was the race to the nuke because they knew they'd already posted after that the technology, that technological shift that changed the paradigm in society, and there would have to be a reset like in 1945 to 1947 you see the creation of every single world organization that currently exists [via NSA] and we say has control right now, including the CIA.  We see the creation of the state of Israel, the current state of play.  By the 1960s, they'd already said okay the next stage we are going into because "On Thermonuclear War," 1960, had been written in 196[0] which posited a mutually assured destruction.  For people who don't understand, what that means it meant that if everybody fired big bombs at each other, if everybody dies they won't do that; instead they will enact other mechanisms underneath, basically different forms of espionage, subversion, intrusion, and manipulation to try and make the other side do different things and act in certain ways but stop at [hot] war.  But at the same time in 1957 Kissinger had written "Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy," 1957, which dictated the perpetual limited warfare would be the best way to go because then you don't end up in a big war.  So they kind of combine those things together.  By 1967, they knew computing power was coming and this is why the big race to predict the technologies of the future because these guys also understood how technology was moving exponentially and now each technological shift caused a new reset. 1967 left us with a neoconservative world, a neoconservative world used early computing, early technology, early statistics, early communication, technological evolution that we've seen like ease of TV, video, DVD, all of these things.  They were different ways to make movies, different ways to get information out.  They used all of these different things to get to the point where we saw the next reset, which was 1992, 1990 to 1992, the fall of the Soviet Union, this whole thing of "Hope and Change,"

3:30.  . . . but the at the same time they create in a Centrist World they create a third wave politics Anthony Giddens is writing this up in the 1980s.  Clinton will be saying out loud, "I'm the first Third Way politician."  They will purge . . . every country on earth will purge the left of their party down to the bare bones to move it to the center.  Every left-wing party will get purged, move it all to the center.  Then the right to compete has to move to the center, too.  You're left with one big blob, two extremes you can paint as weirdos, idiots, and extremists that you can fight against really easy and manufacture consent, while you have this big intelligence blob in the center.  Yet there's no political solution in the center.  All the political solutions are on the left of politics, or the right of politics, so it's something that is just a stopgap between a free world, a democracy that we lived in, the idea of a free world, and what will be the overarching technology.  So that was the early 90s that reset happened and they knew the internet Revolution was happening they were already seeding Training Up Young global leaders in places like David Shaw, D. E. Shaw in New York which was the biggest hedge fund in New York at the time and we're creating and training people like Jeff Bezos and Halsey Minor, who would be implanted into Amazon and seen it which was download, no new sort of platform another different Tech leadership programs.  At the same time, Edge was really being created by John Brockman and eventually funded by Jeffrey Epstein which is funding all of the big Tech leaders for the future.  By the time you get to 1992, what they do is they are saying this is a New World, this is now the internet era.  They start to understand how to use algorithms, they build algorithms, they're building the technocracy, and the reset we have now, the Great Reset, is a technocratic panopticon being built around us.  So for people who don't know what a panopticon is, Jeremy Bentham in the 1700s said basically you can design a prison, you can have one guard in the center, and he is able to see all cells at the same time.  So you need one guard, and no one knows if that guard is watching them.  He could be watching if he's obscured from the prisoners, so everybody thinks they are being watched and for that reason everybody will behave like mutually assured destruction like those paradigms; they've inserted that in into mental behavior psychology and how to implement that online through algorithms to keep us chained.  So they're creating the digital technocratic panopticon.  Where we think we are being watched on all these different devices all of the time we know we're being watched by these devices we know they're keeping massive data and where they have ai robots going through this data so we will behave like they want us to behave on the whole.  And that's the new reset, that's the Great Reset.  So we've gone through multiple resets but it's always in line with technology AI predicts that we have to have a reset now in the next 5 days 6 years I don't like quoting these people and what they say because a lot of it I think is scaremongering and some of it is fantasy mixed in.  But Eric Schmidt has said a couple of times, he said in his book he did with Henry Kissinger, the last book that Henry Kissinger did, and he said it out loud recently that, "Humans in about 5 to 6 years time, humans will understand things that they know now to be true but have no way of explaining, and they will be able to prove those things."  For us, we are entering into times where everything is about to turn esoteric and we are already at the point of 5th generation warfare.  No one really knows what to believe.  

7:40.  The next type of technology will dictate the next era, the next state of affairs.  It will bring on a new reset, and that reset is obviously exponentially in growth getting faster and faster.  For what they are trying to do is design a society to allow for reset.  That means we have no stability, and we're not allowed stability.  The less stability we have and the less permanence we have, the more we own and the more stable we are, the worse for those in power to be able to implement resets, and that's why everybody feels like they're being jolted around all the time because that will be the state of humankind until humans overthrow the technocratic panopticon, which will happen because everything rises and everything falls.  And [entropy?] exists everywhere, including within social orders.  That is a fact.  They know it to be so too.  Yet they will try and plan out and look at what comes next afterwards and already co-opt it.