MARGULIS: So the preconceived notion of NIST is that there's no evidence of explosives so there's no point in looking. That is the most unscientific thing that you could possibly think of. Not to look because you don't expect to find evidence . . .

[RG911Team] If you have followed this series from “9/11 Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out”, you shouldn’t be surprised that controlled demolition is the only hypothesis that explains what happened at the WTC on 9/11. You don’t have to be an architect to understand this. https://t.co/G9VjjAZ3WW pic.twitter.com/6jB68StVTr

— Richard Gage, AIA, Architect (@RichardGage_911) April 25, 2024