Tuesday, December 9, 2025

BREAKING - This woman received 100k likes for explaining exactly how the mainstream media lies and slanders ICE.

SAMA HOOLE: You're not "detoxing" with juice cleanses. Your liver detoxes. It's been doing it since birth. It doesn't need £89 of blended vegetables.

SAMA HOOLE: But the cholesterol hypothesis needed a villain. Just saying "cholesterol" wasn't working because cholesterol is essential for life. Solution: Rebrand LDL as "bad cholesterol" and HDL as "good cholesterol." This is marketing, not science.

Before 1980: Cholesterol was just cholesterol. Doctors measured total cholesterol. 1980s: Researchers discover LDL and HDL particles that transport cholesterol. LDL takes cholesterol to tissues. HDL brings it back to liver. Both are essential transport mechanisms. But the cholesterol hypothesis needed a villain. Just saying "cholesterol" wasn't working because cholesterol is essential for life. Solution: Rebrand LDL as "bad cholesterol" and HDL as "good cholesterol." This is marketing, not science. LDL isn't bad. It's a transport vehicle your body requires for delivering cholesterol to cells that need it for membranes, hormones, and repair. But "bad cholesterol" sounds dangerous. It gave the hypothesis a villain that people could understand. The media ran with it: "Bad cholesterol clogs arteries!" "Lower your bad cholesterol!" "Good cholesterol protects you!" Simple narrative. Memorable. Wrong. What actually matters isn't LDL level. It's: - LDL particle size (small dense particles are concerning, large fluffy are benign) - Oxidation status (oxidized LDL causes inflammation, native LDL doesn't) - Inflammatory markers (CRP, IL-6) - Triglyceride/HDL ratio (better predictor than LDL) But explaining that requires nuance. "Bad cholesterol" requires no nuance. The rebrand was so successful that doctors still say "bad cholesterol" and patients understand it as inherently harmful. Half of heart attack patients have normal LDL. Half of people with high LDL never have heart attacks. If LDL was actually "bad" and caused heart disease, this wouldn't be true. But once you've branded something "bad," evidence doesn't matter. The label sticks. "Bad cholesterol" is marketing language that became medical terminology. Your body doesn't have "bad cholesterol." It has LDL particles performing essential transport functions. Calling them "bad" is like calling delivery trucks "bad" because sometimes they're involved in accidents. The truck isn't the problem. What it's carrying and how it's driving matter.

But "bad truck" sells more fear than "check your particle size and oxidation status." 

SAMA HOOLE: Your choice: temporary discomfort leading to health, or permanent comfort leading to decline.

You start carnivore. Week 2 hits. Suddenly: Joint pain you didn't have before Rashes appearing Digestion is chaos Energy is terrible Sleep is disrupted You panic. "Carnivore is making me sick!" Actually, carnivore is revealing how sick you already were. Oxalate dumping: You've been eating spinach, almonds, sweet potatoes, and chocolate for years. Oxalates accumulate in tissues because your body can't process them fast enough. Remove plant foods → oxalates start releasing from storage → temporary symptoms as your body expels them. This can take weeks to months depending on how much you accumulated. Fat-stored toxins: You start burning body fat. That fat has been storing pesticides, seed oil metabolites, and environmental toxins for years. Burn the fat → toxins release into bloodstream → temporary increase in symptoms until they're eliminated. Your body is literally detoxing. This is healing, not harm. The alternative: Keep eating plants, keep storing toxins, never feel the temporary discomfort, and just... stay sick permanently with vague symptoms you accept as normal. Or: Push through 2-8 weeks of detox symptoms and come out the other side actually healthy. Your choice: temporary discomfort leading to health, or permanent comfort leading to decline. Most people choose the latter and wonder why they never get better.

SAMA HOOLE: guess which one has the cancer warning label? The bacon. With 50x LESS nitrates.

Nitrate comparison time: Bacon (per serving): 5mg nitrates Spinach (per serving): 250mg nitrates Arugula (per serving): 250mg nitrates Celery (per serving): 150mg nitrates Beetroot (per serving): 110mg nitrates Guess which one has the cancer warning label. Not the vegetables that health influencers blend into smoothies. The bacon. With 50x LESS nitrates. Your body produces 60-80mg nitrates daily. In your mouth and gut. Naturally. But 5mg in bacon is apparently carcinogenic while 250mg in spinach is a superfood. Same molecule. Different marketing budget. Processed meat gets the WHO warning. Vegetables get the health halo. Not because of science. Because bacon threatens grain industry market share and vegetables don't. Follow the money. Always.