Thursday, December 31, 2020

How can a vaccine be of any value if viruses mutate?

Monday, December 28, 2020

Two lawsuits . . . challenge the root of the problem: the emergency itself.

By Spiro Skouras

Ever since the world became aware of Covid-19 in early 2020, we have warned of the possibility that the government response may turn out to be worse than the condition itself.

Many have described this response as a form of medical tyranny, sold to us as a temporary measure for the greater good. Two weeks to flatten the curve they said.

Four months into the lockdowns, some of us half-jokingly said things like, “I hope they lift the lockdowns before the 4th of July, so we can celebrate our freedoms.”

Now we find ourselves eight months into a two-week lockdown with no end in sight, despite the fact that a federal judge in Pennsylvania ruled the shutdowns were unconstitutional. The Michigan Supreme Court also ruled that the Governor’s emergency orders had violated the Constitution. So why hasn’t anything changed?

In this interview, Spiro’s guest Dr. Pamela Popper discusses two new lawsuits that she believes could end Covid-1984. The two lawsuits, one in Ohio and one in New Mexico, challenge the root of the problem: the emergency itself.  

Will the Karens stop socializing personal responsibility? Physician, heal thyself.

The fact that Americans are following the mask mandate is the best example of an American psychosis.  Notice how the store clerk offers her a mask AFTER she's already told the clerk that she's not going to wear one.  This is a clear example of these Karens presuming that they know more about disease, health, and immunity than you do.  

At the 00:12 second mark, the masked woman says, 

Whenever there's a flu, there are only two or three patients in the ICU at a time.  Literally, the entire hospital is a COVID unit and this has never happened.  

The trouble with remarks like these is that they lack context and authority.  Everyone is trying to grasp some authority in their efforts to police and force others to comply with their desired aversion to any risk.  They've been given just enough information to turn them into street epidemiologists, but that just ain't working.  

I was in a grocery store last summer that required masks.  I wore a mask because there was something in the store I wanted.  But I wore the mask off my nose.  The clerk who knows me and has been friendly with me says, "You know, the masks only work if you wear them properly."  I looked at her with her mask covering her face and said, "Well, you're wearing a mask, aren't you."  That absolutely crushed her.  She replied, "That's not how it works," as though wearing the mask was a charade and the game in which "we're all in this together" comes with a set of prescribed rules.  Suddenly, the health benefits of the mask were reduced to a charade.  So the wearing a mask was a game, and wearing them properly meant following certain rules set by SOME unknown authority.  This is American psychosis.  

The lead up to this current medical psychosis began the day that Donald Trump was elected.  The barrage of attacks against him have been unremittant--from the Russian collusion to the Russian hoax to Stormy Daniels to his dodging impeachment, his attackers have been legion and unrelenting.  The four years since his election consisted of a psychosis that only primed Americans for further derangement during the 2020 COVID.   

Asymptomatic spread has been shown to be a myth.

Correct.  Asymptomatic means you're healthy.  Period.  Dot.

00:24

Fewer deaths overall in 2019 than there were in 2018.  

I think she misspoke.  I think she wanted to compare 2020 deaths to 2019 deaths, meaning that there were fewer deaths in 2020 than in 2019.  To the point, she's asking, "Where is the pandemic?"  

All they've done is recategorize all the deaths.  This is not what they're telling us what it is.  It's a lie. 

Then at the 00:53 second mark, in walks, a mummified American or zombie, holding out a mask, her voice muffled by her virtue-signaling deviant narrative and deadened by her following orders given to her by the media.  The masked woman has adopted an uncritical narrative that she feels compelled to force on others FOR THEIR OWN GOOD.  When will these Karens stop socializing personal responsibility?  the woman offering a mask is wearing both a plastic visor AND a mask.  Oh, God.  What a frightened kitten.  Has she ever heard of zinc, vitamin D or vitamin C? 

1:00 

For everyone to put all this stuff on their face when they're healthy is insanity.  

And then the real idiocy erupts with the statement, "You're willing to risk people's lives?"  That is the most evil statements I've heard surrounding this cold virus.  

I'm not risking anyone's life.  I'm healthy!  

True.  

How do we know that you're healthy? 

What a monster.  That masked monster is only baiting the young gal and forcing her to defend herself, while not crediting a single point that she's making.  Truly mummified women in masks.

Look at me.  Asymptomatic spread is not a thing. They've already shown there is not asymptomatic spread.  I don't have symptoms.  I'm fine.  I'm not a carrier of a disease.  This is what I am saying--they're treating us like we're diseased.  You just said, "How is this treating you like you're diseased, but you're   It's not just the mask.  It's the social distancing.  It's the lockdowns.  It's everything.  I'm not doing it anymore.  I'm not doing it anymore.  I'm done. 

And here is the coup de grace by the masked Karen, 

You're not in a position to be careful with other people's health.  

That masked mummy is psychotic, either that or a criminal  She would do well in the old Soviet Union.  

And then the nastiest of the nasties, 

You're moving tomorrow, right? 

I guess that the masked moron is giddy with destroying civilization.  

Saturday, December 26, 2020

"Attorneys have been threatened NOT TO HELP PEOPLE"

Attorneys have been threatened NOT TO HELP PEOPLE?!?!?!?

If a company is private and is entitled to creating any policy it wants, then why are companies complying with CDC recommendations?  By deferring to a pseudo-government/private entity, the CDC, companies put more muscle behind their policies whether it’s a mask mandate, six-feet apart, or taking 2 Tylenol as a condition for entering their store.

Is this a way to give any policy they create more weight

33 mins. 

Why are they citing the CDC and the public health orders, that are not even laws, that they have to comply with?  You guys got to think this through, and I hope that the sheriff is listening and I hope the police are listening: you guys are part of the problem.  Think!  And I know you know what the truth is anyway.  I know you do, and you’re just afraid to lose your job and that is pathetic.  You should be fired!

You are practicing medicine without a license.

35 mins.

Is it fancy pants and lollipops?  Is it a bribe that you’ve received?  Is it a promise for a promotion?  Do they have something on you?  Have you compromised yourself?  Whether it’s sexual, whether it’s theft, I just don’t know.  What I do know is that each of you is . . . what I can’t reconcile in my mind is how you can sell out your own children and grandchildren, throw them right under the bus. 

38 mins.

How much money do you think they got in April from the disaster funds?  Palm Beach County with a 2020 population of 1,510,660 received $261 million.  Over a quarter of a billion dollars.  That’s just to start in April.  I don’t know what else they received.  Chapter 252: Disaster funds.  In Florida statutes.  You’ve got the Florida mutual aid plan.  You’ve got FEMA.  Emergency Management Systems Compact.  Emergency Use Authorization.  The CARES Act.  Other things, including insurance monies.  That’s what they’re doing.  They’re bailing themselves out. 

If these counties rescind any of the mandates, they need to return the federal relief funds. 

40  just file a complaint.  And submit it to whom?  They will try to head you off by sending you on a fool’s errand. 

49  The department heads are lying.  The judges are lying.  They’re all lying.  They’re overtly lying and they know it.  They know the law.  It’s no mystery. 

Start with an administrative agency, the Human Rights Commission.  You have something like this in every state.  The state agency is not going to help you at all.  They’re part of the problem; they’re perpetuating the problem.  But you still have to do that, because the court can’t hear it.  Because the court’s gonna say, “you still have to do something with the state agency; otherwise, I don’t have jurisdiction.

Don’t listen to these people; go ahead and make your complaint.

If your gov’t agency is acting outside of its mandate, that means that they’re not immune. 

52  The Uncle Odd Show’s “Notice of Liability.”  Notice of liability is conditional acceptance of their offer.  A mandate is an offer.  They have to prove, 1) that the virus exists, 2) that social distancing is medically effective, and 3) that masks work.  And they have 21 days to be able to do that.  When they don’t, which they won’t, then you send out a second notice, because that’s the honorable thing to do.  You give them another 14 days to comply.  The 14 days will pass and they will not have responded.  At that point, at the end of the 14 days, they will be in default.  So I’ll send a notice of default.  There are 8 or 9 steps to this process, but the end of that it will be their conditional acceptance of my notice of Liability.  Now they are liable.  Their office is liable.  And they are liable as a man or a woman, where I understand it, I can file liens against their office and against them personally.  

SOURCES

Fakeologist.  

Fakeologist Home Page


"Vaccination does not confer a true, genuine immunity. . . . It only drives the disease deeper into the interior and causes us to harbor it chronically instead . . . "

The positive benefits of vaccines are always presented as a slam dunk.  Vaccine expert, Dr. Richard Moskowitz, MD and Homeopath, points out that 

the price we have to pay for these antibodies is the persistence of viral elements in the blood for long periods of time, perhaps permanently, which in turn carries with it a systematic weakening of our capacity to mount an acute response, not only to the measles, but to other infections as well.


A brilliant analysis of vaccination, by Richard Moskowitz, MD, and homeopath

Dec 24 by Jon Rappoport

by Jon Rappoport

December 24, 2020

(To join Jon Rappoport's email list, click here.)

BACKGROUND ON VACCINES

In the age of COVID, vaccination looms large. As in mandatory. And of course, toxic.

I’ve already covered two new vaccine technologies, one of which has already been pushed forward, to “protect” people from a virus that has never been properly proven to exist.

DNA vaccines, aka gene therapy, permanently alter recipients’ genetic makeup in unknown ways. RNA vaccines (Pfizer’s and Moderna’s, just approved for COVID) can cause auto-immune reactions—which means the body attacks itself. [1] [2]

In this piece, I want to take a look at a few fundamentals about vaccination. In particular, the claim that vaccines have done a fantastic job of reducing case numbers of diseases, and therefore all criticisms of these injections are irrelevant.

WHO IS DR. RICHARD MOSKOWITZ?

From his bio [3]: “Richard Moskowitz was born in 1938 and educated at Harvard (B.A.) and New York University (M.D.). After medical school, he did 3 years of graduate study in Philosophy at the University of Colorado in Boulder on a U. S. Steel Fellowship.”

“He took his internship at St. Anthony’s Hospital, Denver, and has been practicing family medicine since 1967, as well as attending about 800 home births. With a background in Oriental medicine and other forms of natural healing, Dr. Moskowitz studied homeopathy with George Vithoulkas in Greece and Rajan Sankaran and others in India.”

In 1987, while writing my first book, AIDS INC., I had a long conversation on the phone with Richard about vaccination. It was my first trip exploring vaccines as a form of immune-system suppression.

I had already seen that AIDS was actually a lumping together of various immune-system problems, none of which needed HIV as an explanation.

I still recall that phone conversation with Richard Moskowitz. I came away from it with an idea about how vaccines could be touted and trumpeted as the reason for vastly reducing cases of diseases, when in fact the reduction of visible symptoms was occurring—a very different thing.

If vaccines were lowering immune-system response, then the acute, vigorous, and all-out inflammatory reaction to germs would be eliminated. And it IS that acute reaction which creates the visible symptoms (rashes, spots, etc.).

Vaccination equals no cases of measles, the experts say. But really, as a result of vaccination, it’s just the visible rash that is missing, while something more dangerous, out of view, is going on in the body.

I’m printing here an excerpt from Richard’s article (written years ago), The Case Against Immunizations. The article is based on a classical view of germs and the action of the human immune system. The pros and cons of germ theory itself are a different matter, about which I’ve spoken and written in other places. [4] [5]

Note: Although the RNA COVID vaccines deploy a technology different from classical vaccines, they still rely on antibody response as the key to “producing immunity.” But that response is only one of many natural reactions in the body which maintain health and ward off disease.

From Dr. Richard Moskowitz’s brilliantly articulated article, The Case Against Immunizations: [6]

“It is dangerously misleading, and indeed the exact opposite of the truth, to claim that a vaccine renders us ‘immune’ to or protects us against an acute disease, if in fact it only drives the disease deeper into the interior and causes us to harbor it chronically instead, with the result that our responses to it become progressively weaker, but show less and less of a tendency to heal or resolve themselves spontaneously. What I propose, then, is to investigate as thoroughly and objectively as I can how the vaccines actually work inside the human body, and to begin by simply paying attention to the implications of what we already know. Consider the process of falling ill with and recovering from a typical acute disease, such as the measles, in contrast with what we can observe following administration of the measles vaccine.”

“…Once inhaled by a susceptible individual, the [measles] virus undergoes a prolonged period of silent multiplication, first in the tonsils, adenoids, and accessory lymphoid aggregations of the nasopharynx; later in the regional lymph nodes of the head and neck; and eventually, several days later, it passes into the blood and enters the spleen, the liver, the thymus, and the bone marrow, the ‘visceral’ organs of the immune system. Throughout this ‘incubation’ period, which lasts from 10 to 14 days, the patient typically feels quite well, and experiences few or no symptoms of any kind.”

“By the time that the first symptoms of measles appear, circulating antibodies are already detectable in the blood, and the height of the symptomatology coincides with the peak of the antibody response. In other words, the ‘illness’ that we call the measles is simply the definitive effort of the immune system to clear this virus from the blood. Notice also that this expulsion is accomplished by sneezing and coughing, i. e., via the same route through which it entered in the first place. It is abundantly clear from the above that the process of mounting and recovering from an acute illness like the measles involves a general mobilization of the immune system as a whole, including inflammation of the previously sensitized tissues at the portal(s) of entry, activation of leukocytes, macrophages, and the serum complement system, and a host of other mechanisms, of which the production of circulating antibodies is only one, and by no means the most important.”

“Such splendid outpourings indeed represent the decisive experiences in the normal physiological maturation of the immune system in the life of a healthy child. For recovery from the measles not only protects children from being susceptible to it again, no matter how many more times they may be exposed to it, but also prepares them to respond promptly and effectively to any other infections they may encounter in the future. The ability to mount a vigorous acute response to infection must therefore be reckoned among the most fundamental requirements of health and well-being that we all share.”

“By contrast, the live but artificially attenuated measles-virus vaccine is injected directly into the blood, bypassing the normal port of entry and set[ting] up at most a brief inflammatory reaction at the injection site, or perhaps in the regional lymph nodes, with no local sensitization at the normal portal of entry, no ‘incubation period,’ no generalized inflammatory response, and no generalized outpouring. By ‘tricking’ the body in this fashion, we have accomplished precisely what the entire immune system seems to have evolved to prevent: we have placed the virus directly into the blood, and given it free and immediate access to the major immune organs and tissues, without any obvious mechanism or route for getting rid of it.”

“The result is the production of circulating antibodies against the virus, which can in fact be measured in the blood; but this antibody response occurs as an isolated technical feat, without any overt illness to recover from, or any noticeable improvement in the general health of the recipient. Indeed I submit that exactly the opposite is true, that the price we have to pay for these antibodies is the persistence of viral elements in the blood for long periods of time, perhaps permanently, which in turn carries with it a systematic weakening of our capacity to mount an acute response, not only to the measles, but to other infections as well.”

“Far from producing a genuine immunity, then, my suspicion and my fear is that vaccines act by interfering with and even suppressing the immune response as a whole, in much the same way that radiation, chemotherapy, corticosteroids, and other anti-inflammatory drugs do. Artificial immunization focuses on antibody production, a single aspect of the immune process, disarticulates it, and allows it to stand for the whole, in much the same way as chemical suppression of an elevated blood pressure is accepted as a valid substitute for genuine healing or cure of the patient whose blood pressure has risen. It is the frosting on the cake, without the cake. The worst part of this counterfeiting is that it becomes more difficult, if not impossible, for vaccinated children to mount a normally acute and vigorous response to infection, by substituting for it a much weaker, essentially chronic response, with little or no tendency to heal itself spontaneously.”

This is an explanation of vaccination which chops down the claim that vaccines are wonderful because they eliminate cases of disease.

With experimental RNA COVID vaccines, who knows how long the injected RNA lingers in the body, and what effects it produces over time? The relatively short clinical trials certainly don’t offer useful conclusions. [7] [8] The CDC blithely assures us that once the injected RNA offers “instructions to cells of the body,” the cells destroy the RNA. Sounds magical. The cells wait, receive instructions, THEN destroy the messenger.

And again, as I stated above, RNA technology has, in the past, caused auto-immune reactions, in which the body basically attacks itself.


SOURCES:

[1] https://www.denverpost.com/2020/12/09/pfizer-covid-vaccine-allergic-reactions/

[2] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/01/26/vaccine-for-the-china-virus-the-planet-is-the-guinea-pig-for-a-vast-experiment/

[3] https://healthy.net/author/richard-moskowitz-md/

[4] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2016/08/08/what-youll-never-read-about-virus-research-fraud/

[5] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2018/08/01/remember-the-pandemic-that-was-going-to-wipe-out-humanity-were-still-here/

[6] https://vaccineimpact.com/2015/richard-moskowitz-m-d-the-case-against-immunizations/

[7] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/12/21/why-you-shouldnt-believe-the-covid-vaccine-is-effective/

[8] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/09/24/covid-vaccine-clinical-trials-doomed-to-fail-fatal-design-flaw/