TULSI GABBARD RENOUNCES EVIL: SHE'S DUMPING THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. IN 2016, SHE DUMPED THE "SHOULD BE" PRESIDENT, HILLARY

Be advised, too, that Tulsi is not a member of WEF, though she did attend their conference.  Attending something to learn about it, a kind of fact-finding mission, does not equate membership or commitment to cause whatsoever.  If you listen to her message, Gabbard is rejecting evil, not embracing it.  And in doing so, she is adhering to her principles.  You may not find her message strong enough, but she is a committed to public service.  Per her Wikipedia page, Gabbard (born April 12, 1981) "is an American politician," a committed one, too.  She is an "U.S. Army Reserve officer and political commentator who served as the U.S. representative for Hawaii's 2nd congressional district from 2013 to 2021."  Like her or not, that shows commitment.  She was a candidate for the Democratic Party nomination in the 2020 presidential election where she slammed Hillary Clinton, the 2016 "presumed presidential candidate."  Luongo points out that, 

It never fails. I tweet about @TulsiGabbard and my feed blows up with responses from people who never comment on any other topic.

For those wholly gaslit here. She crossed Hitlary when everyone thought Hitlary would be president.

THAT TAKES STONES. Now recalibrate.

— Tom Luongo (Powell's a Baller) (@TFL1728) October 11, 2022

The WEF keeps her image up at their site because they want to give the impression that she's one of their own.  She is not.  She is renouncing their evil.   

Attending a conference is one thing. Committing to it is another. She didn't sign on with evil. She's renouncing it. WEF will absolutely use her image to suggest otherwise just like the IPCC retained thousands of signatures by scientists who rejected global warming.

— Mike Walgenbach (@mwalgen44) October 11, 2022

Luongo again, 

Is this the voice of the Triple Agent the Gaslit Right thinks she is?

Is this not enough? https://t.co/esAxO6MpmN

— Tom Luongo (Powell's a Baller) (@TFL1728) October 11, 2022

 

So, that DeSantis/Gabbard 2024 ticket?
Looking pretty strong right now.
Step 1: Get out of the Swamp (check)
Step 2: Leave the DNC (Check)
Step 3: Continue being awesome (Check) https://t.co/6aePUdqTST

— Tom Luongo (Powell's a Baller) (@TFL1728) October 11, 2022

Is this the voice of the Triple Agent the Gaslit Right thinks she is?

Is this not enough? https://t.co/esAxO6MpmN

— Tom Luongo (Powell's a Baller) (@TFL1728) October 11, 2022

Here is her full presentation.  It's good.   

Putin, so far, hasn't given them the casus belli they need to create a complementary coming together of the West's populations. There is still no appetite for war in the West.

Blowback is very real. So, with Neocons like Bolton, German Greens, Poles, Brits believing Russia is weak, will push until he has no other options.

But, again, who greenlit these psychopaths in the first place? Who put them in power in the US Nat. Sec. Hierarchy?
/16

— Tom Luongo (Powell's a Baller) (@TFL1728) October 9, 2022

The weak governments in both the US and UK have invited this expansion of insanity.

Putin, so far, hasn't given them the casus belli they need to create a complementary coming together of the West's populations.

There is still no appetite for war in the West.
/18

— Tom Luongo (Powell's a Baller) (@TFL1728) October 9, 2022

And if you've got any critical thinking cajones left, check this out by Jacob Dreizin.  

This is electioneering in the US and the Great Reset for the EU

While I don't doubt US complicity in this, do not let the Brits off the hook here. Everyone associated with Davos NEEDS an escalation before the US mid-terms to justify what they want to do next... default, cancel elections, etc. And Blame it on Putin.  https://t.co/fMsSwkTLjH

— Tom Luongo (Powell's a Baller) (@TFL1728) October 8, 2022

From The Daily Wire,

The Kerch bridge, which joins the annexed peninsula to Russia, is Europe’s longest bridge. Reports said an explosion ignited fuel tanks on the strategically important bridge, and social media images showed the tanker in flames and part of the roadway had fallen into the Sea of Azov. Reports on social media claimed the explosion was caused by a suicide bomber in a truck, but that could not be confirmed.

This is correct but too narrow. The UK and Europe want this as well. They NEED Putin to react to justify further escalation. He refuses to oblige them, smartly.

This is electioneering in the US and the Great Reset for the EU https://t.co/3xGETa38dU

— Tom Luongo (Powell's a Baller) (@TFL1728) October 8, 2022

MATT WALSH TO SICK FREAKS: KISS MY ASS

I liked this Chesterton quote,

“He is a very shallow critic who cannot see an eternal rebel in the heart of a conservative.” ~G.K.Chesterton

— SolitudeAndLight3 (@SolitudeLight3) October 7, 2022

So, here's my official answer for the record.  

Kiss my ass.  I do not apologize.  In fact, by all rights, you sick freaks should be the ones apologizing to me for lying and defaming me and doing it all because I am trying to prevent you from sexually mutilating children, you damned monsters.  You child abusing psychopaths.  I wouldn't apologize to you soulless parasites if I had a gun to my head.  Instead, I'd rather just tell you all to piss off.  I apologize for nothing.  I concede nothing.  I will never surrender a single inch of ground to a pitchfork mob of degenerate morons.  You know the secret they never say out loud is that nobody is truly canceled unless they consent to it and they willingly play their assigned roles.  Well, I do not consent and I am not going to play the game.  I'm not going anywhere.  

Remember when Congress used to declare war?

Translation:MI6 start the false flag operation STAT! https://t.co/y3TFDmPI5T

— Tom Luongo (Powell's a Baller) (@TFL1728) October 3, 2022

Article 1, Section 8 enumerates war powers of Congress.  Unfortunately, the U.S. Congress has only declared war only 5 times.  Think of how many wars the U.S. has been involved with . . . exactly . . . scores of wars without Congressional declaration.  Those five wars were declared by Congress under their constitutional power to do so were the 

War of 1812 [1812-1814], Mexican-American War [1846-1848], Spanish=American War, World War I [1916-1918], and World War II [1941-1945].

The first war the U.S. engaged in without a declaration was the 1950, Korean War.  

The Korean War was the first modern example of the U.S. being taken to war without a formal declaration, as has been repeated in every armed conflict since.  

Here is Article 1, Section 8, Clauses 11 through 16: 

“The Congress shall have Power . . . To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

“To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

“To provide and maintain a Navy;

“To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces; 

“To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

“To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress”

—U.S. Constitution, Article I, section 8, clauses 11–16 

In talking about the pending Iraq War in 2002, Ron Paul writes, 

only Congress has the authority to declare war. Yet Congress in general, and the committee in particular, have done everything possible to avoid making such a declaration. Why? Because members lack the political courage to call an invasion of Iraq what it really is – a war – and vote yes or no on the wisdom of such a war.

What's sad is that the United States has effectively surrendered this Constitutional power to the UN by waiting for a UN resolution to tell the president to go to war rather than Congress.  Pity.  So, when you hear "resolution" or "Resolution Wars Act," just note that the U.S. has surrendered its constitutional authority to declare war over to the United Nations.  

Though it's Congress's authorization to declare war, some have argued that the President has the powers to direct hostilities.  Tom Woods breaks this down thoroughly.  

But what the framers actually meant by that clause was that once war has been declared, it was the President’s responsibility as commander-in-chief to direct the war. Alexander Hamilton spoke in such terms when he said that the president, although lacking the power to declare war, would have “the direction of war when authorized or begun.” The president acting alone was authorized only to repel sudden attacks (hence the decision to withhold from him only the power to “declare” war, not to “make” war, which was thought to be a necessary emergency power in case of foreign attack).

So I think Tom Luongo above is correct.  The British MI6 will craft a story that will push the U.S. through a UN resolution into war. 

"Biden was put in power by Davos to liquidate the US."

Biden's been a neocon for 40 years. Or have you not been paying attention. He was put in power by Davos to liquidate the US.

By those metrics he's one of the most successful presidents in history.

— Tom Luongo (Powell's a Baller) (@TFL1728) September 29, 2022

For those new to the conversation about the split at the top of the hierarchy, I've covered a lot of this in my podcast with a variety of guests.
It's an eighteen month conversation in talk and in print.
Start with Ep.75.  https://t.co/H5Z6c5jBEs

— Tom Luongo (Powell's a Baller) (@TFL1728) September 29, 2022

As to who destroyed the Nord Stream pipelines, it doesn't hurt to ask Cui bono?

The Malthusian Central Planners (Davos types) explicit goal is to have the rich countries in Europe use less energy.

Would a Russian pipeline going offline help achieve this?

Weird everything we see today coincidentally benefits the global elite?

Probably nothing though…

— George Gammon (@GeorgeGammon) September 28, 2022

And this.

Notice how she says “the sabotage action” and not “the alleged sabotage action.”

I don’t care how much you hate Russia/Putin, and maybe it’s justified, but you can’t trust these people.

They lied about Covid, they lied about inflation, why wouldn’t they lie about Russia?

— George Gammon (@GeorgeGammon) September 28, 2022

BREAKING: Gov. Ron DeSantis announces legislative proposal prohibiting the CCP, other countries of concern, from purchasing land near U.S. military bases

Chad the Governor https://t.co/PUYojCpcYh

— Tom Luongo (Powell's a Baller) (@TFL1728) September 22, 2022

Gee, I wonder why.  Because of the purchases lately in Florida and North Dakota by biotech firms.  Is he hoping that other states will be pressured to follow?  Let's hope so.   

HILARY FORDWICH: "we need to go right back to the beginning of that supply chain and say, 'Who was rounding up their own people, and having them handcuffed in cages?'"

Ok, so strategy should always be…Agree and Amplify

Here’s your first lesson https://t.co/0rP22sTz3j

— Tom Luongo (Powell's a Baller) (@TFL1728) September 20, 2022

00:00  Don Lemon.  Well, this is coming . . . all of this wealth and you hear about it comes as England is facing rising costs of living, a living crisis, austerity budget cuts, and so on.  And then you have those who are asking for reparations for colonialism, and they're wondering, you know, $100 billion dollar, $24 billion dollars here and there, $500 million there.  Some people want to be paid back and members of the public wonder "why are we suffering when you are . . . you know, you have all of this vast wealth.  Those are legitimate concerns.

00:32  Hilary Fordwich Well, I think you're right about reparations.  If people want it though, what you need to do is to always go back to the beginning of the supply chain.  Where was the beginning of the supply chain?  That was in Africa.  When across the entire world that slavery was taking place, which was the first nation in the world that abolished slavery?  First nation in the world to abolish was, started by William Wilberforce, was British, Great Britain, they abolished slavery.  2,000 naval men died on the high seas trying to stop slavery.  Why?  Because the African kings were rounding up their own people.  They had them in cages waiting on the beaches.  No one was running into Africa to get them.  But I think you're totally right.  If reparations need to be paid, we need to go right back to the beginning of that supply chain and say, "Who was rounding up their own people, and having them handcuffed in cages?"  Absolutely.  That's where they should start.  And maybe, I don't know, the descendants of those families, where the naval men died at the high seas trying to stop the slavery, that those families should receive something, too, I think, at the same time.  

1:36  Lemon [stunned]  It's an interesting discussion, Hilary. Thank you very much.  I appreciate it.  We'll continue to discuss in the future.   

Everything Davos does at the policy level is designed to make the old systems more expensive by raising costs due to complication (friction), making their "new system" look financially attractive.

You like $2.00 gasoline? Restrict supply and cock up the global distribution model to make it $4.00/gallon.

You like cheap phones and porn? You can have those; they are essential control levers.

— Tom Luongo (Powell's a Baller) (@TFL1728) September 15, 2022

It’s the lesser of 2 evils: Team Fed (US banks) or Klaus Schwab in his banana hammock along with his WEF ilk (Davos).

It's so edifying watching your kids grow up in real time. :)

Excellent thread here from Phil. https://t.co/SM84OKPvqT

— Tom Luongo (Powell's a Baller) (@TFL1728) August 30, 2022