Showing posts with label FBI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FBI. Show all posts

Thursday, May 22, 2025


-Diana West, Author of The Red Thread, American Betrayal and Death of the Grownup -Frank J. Gaffney, Jr., Executive Chairman of the Center for Security Policy -Chris Farrell, Director for Investigations and Research at Judicial Watch -Rich Higgins, Former Pentagon Official Who Served in the NSC Strategic-Planning Office About The Red Thread: The first investigation into why a ring of senior Washington officials went rogue to derail the election and the presidency of Donald Trump. There was nothing normal about the 2016 presidential election, not when senior U.S. officials were turning the surveillance powers of the federal government -- designed to stop terrorist attacks -- against the Republican presidential team. These were the ruthless tactics of a Soviet-style police state, not a democratic republic. The Red Thread asks the simple question: Why? What is it that motivated these anti-Trump conspirators from inside and around the Obama administration and Clinton networks to depart so drastically from “politics as usual” to participate in a seditious effort to overturn an election? Finding clues in an array of sources, Diana West uses her trademark investigative skills, honed in her dazzling work, American Betrayal, to construct a fascinating series of ideological profiles of well-known but little understood anti-Trump actors, from James Comey to Christopher Steele to Nellie Ohr, and the rest of the Fusion GPS team; from John Brennan to the numerous Clintonistas still patrolling the Washington Swamp after all these years, and more. Once, we knew these officials by august titles and reputation; after The Red Thread, readers will recognize their multi-generational and inter-connecting communist and socialist pedigrees, and see them for what they really are: foot-soldiers of the Left, deployed to take down America’s first “America First” and most anti-Communist president. If we just give it a pull, the “red thread” is very long and very deep.


Judicial Watch. federal attack on our election and on the presidency.

The Red Thread: A Search for Ideological Drivers Inside the Anti-Trump Conspiracy, Diana West, 2019. Why did these senior officials at the Justice Department and the FBI, elsewhere in the Obama Administration, why did they decide to engage in so many lawless acts to undermine an election and sabotage a presidency. In other words, we have a famous, wonderful system whereby the transition from one party to another every 2 to 4 years is peaceful. It's common in Washington whereby the out party does something else for a couple of years and waits to take political revenge in the next election cycle. In this case, we've seen something so foreign to our understanding of how our democracy is supposed to work that I decided to try to find out if we could find out why it is that what we're looking at is so familiar to us from totalitarian systems. And that is a very serious undertaking and it begins with the fusion GPS team of Nellie Orr and her husband at the Justice Department. This was sort of the beginning of the Red Thread. It looks at James Comey's ideological roots. It looks at John Brennan. It tries to build out ideological profiles that may help us understand why we have public servants who've sworn to uphold the Constitution who are actually operating under the very Marxist paradigm of "the ends justify the means."

5:45 James Comey, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigations, previously the #2 man at the Department of Justice, seems like an unlikely character given that personal record to have Leftist or Marxist leanings. Walk us through how they're there.

6:12 Yes, he's a very fine subject of study because he's been so open about his own philosophical influences on his entire career. When he was a senior at William and Mary, he graduated in 1982, he did a paper on the Christian and Politics and he looked at Jerry Falwell at the time, a very important figure on the right, and he looked at the man who is considered to be his own ideological mentor, Reinhold Niebuhr, 1892-1971. Most people don't know too much about Reinhold Niebuhr except that he is "liberal, protestant theologian." His writings however have shaped James Comey's outlook, not just as a student but as recently as 2018 when the New York Times interviewed him on the occasion of him publishing his memoir, A Higher Loyalty: Truth, Lies, and Leadership, 2018. He was asked about the most important books that influenced his life, and he selected two Niebuhr titles from 1930-something and 1940, which is the period in which Niebuhr was well known as a member of the Socialist Party in the United States, and a very militant Marxist, who in the early 30s was literally calling for the overthrow of the American social order. This is something quite staggering when you realize that James Comey used his name, Reinhold Niebuhr, as his Twitter handle until he was discovered. This was when he was incognito. This becomes someone to really investigate, to look at on James Comey's view of justice. This is what he studied as a student when he considered himself to be a communist. He was very open about this in an interview that Comey gave in 2003 with New York Magazine where he talked about being a communist in college. He "wasn't quite sure what he was now," this is what he told us as he was preparing to enter the Bush 43 Administration as the #2 at the Justice Department, but he had moved into a Republican style, you might say. It becomes evident when you look at the things that he highlighted as a young man from Niebuhr's readings, and we can go into it; I have some quotations.

Monday, May 19, 2025

EARTHA KITT, 1993: When the wars were over, you didn't tell us not to hate them. You didn't retrain us. And then on top of all of that, you took the industry out of the United States and gave the American jobs to the enemy!

Eartha Kitt, 1927-2008.

This was from a 1993 interview she did on the Whoopi Goldberg Show.  Find it on YouTube in Part I and Part II.  The segment above is found in Part II of the interview.  Enjoy.  Find my transcript of the segment below.

It is something like what Perot has done today but in a much bigger way but of course nobody was doing it. First of all, people thought that I was invited to the White House to sing my songs, "Baby, I Want to Be Evil," 1954 and "Just an Old-Fashioned Girl," 1956.  That was not the case at all.

50 of us women were invited there to give our opinions as to why there was so much juvenile delinquency in the streets of America.  That was the question.  I kept raising my hand.  Every time somebody said something I raised my hand.  Mrs. Johnson was saving me for last it seems.  First of all, I want you to know that President Johnson was not supposed to be there.  But everybody was wondering if he's coming.  It was like waiting for Cary Grant, "Is he coming, is he not coming?" And all of a sudden, the Walls of Jericho opened up and here comes President Johnson with cameras in back of him, you know.  He puts his arm on the rostrum and he actually, I swear to God, cross my heart and hope to die if I'm not telling you the truth, the man said, "I want you all to know how fortunate it is that you are all here today to have lunch with the world's most important family.  I would like for you to go back to your communities and tell your communities what a wonderful family you have here."  

I'm not lying. I'm telling you the truth, Whoopi, may the gods strike me dead if I'm not telling you the truth, anyway . . . .

1:26.  Also, Whoopi, I said to her,

We were taught to hate the Germans because we had to fight that war.

We were taught to hate the Koreans because we had to fight that war.

We were taught to hate the Vietnamese because etc., etc.

We were taught to hate the Japanese.  

When the wars were over, you didn't tell us not to hate them.  You didn't retrain us.  And then on top of all of that, you took the industry out of the United States and gave the American jobs to the enemy!  How can you possibly expect us to accept that when you never told us any differently?  And now you're telling us that we are a problem?  And we came home from these wars without a job?  

2:14. And look at the Gulf War.  These boys came home and didn't even find practically enough money to pay their mortgages, and they're considered undesirables!?  

The poor boys who came back from Vietnam were not even considered first class citizens when they came back.  They were hated!  Undesirables!  And you're now telling us that we should love one another . . . without jobs?  You tell us that we should be good . . . without jobs that you gave to what you told us was the enemy? What are we supposed to do now?  Walk the streets that's what they were doing . . . well, I mean I may be exaggerating a bit now because every time I think about it I just get so angry and annoyed inside about what that government, these governments, are doing to us as Americans citizens.  "MY country 'tis of thee!" as the man said on the voice, the boys who came back from the Vietnamese Wars.  "Great land of bigotry!" What happened?  Why aren't we correcting these situations?  When you bring foreigners into the country, the Koreans, the Vietnamese, the Japanese, and they're walking all over us in our jobs and you expect us to be nice, sweet, loving people when the community is being broken apart.  Now the taxes are so high that both parents have to work and we are latchkey kids. What do you expect of the children?  

3:40.  Anyhow, one lady got up way over in the corner of the room and she said, "Miss Kitt, I'll have you know I have eight sons and I would be glad to donate each one of them to Vietnam."

How can I talk to you?. 

3:57.  Jack Anderson called me in January 1974, I remember it very well, because I was packing up the car taking my daughter and the big Saint Bernard dog up to the mountains to a friend of my daughter's, and the phone rang, and it was Seymour Hirsch from The New York Times who was asking me permission to print what they had found.  And he told me what he found.  He said what I'm sending . . . he sent me a bit of it, it was only a smidgen of what the CIA had on me.  Now the way they put you out of work, of course, Lyndon Baines Johnson. called the networks across the nation, the media in general, all the media, and said "I don't want to see that woman's face anywhere" because he was escalating the wars obviously it seems to me.  And according to my dossier at the bottom of the page it says, "Specifically requested by Lyndon Baines and Ladybird Johnson."  He sent out the FBI to go out to the venues that I had been working in, or that I might be working in, because every place that I'd ever worked at always had return engagement clause in it.  And if the FBI is on the doorsteps of these venues then you are considered a problem.

5:05.  The Ambassador Hotel I had a contract there about 3 weeks later and suddenly they couldn't find the contract it was a signed contract on both parties side all of a sudden the agents don't want to know you even your friends don't want to know you nobody called I was up there in my house and La Colima Drive wondering what happened So eventually I never left this country I will never leave this country I love this country basically I love what America stands for she has a lot of problems and I'm perfectly willing to help her solve her problems so I'm not afraid to open my mouth even though you get your face slapped but I went to Europe, and different places in South America Australia, anywhere that I could find work. And to this day, you still don't know who is remembering, and said, "Well, that mother-in-law said, 'Yes, Eartha, I believe in what you said.  I agree with what you said, but did you have to say it?'" Even my girlfriends who have sons that were about to be at an age to be sent to Vietnam, they were at an age to be sent to Vietnam, who said to me, "I think you should apologize to our friends because of what you did."

I said why?  Don't you have sons?  Do you want your sons to go to Vietnam?

6:19.  We want to build our country from the inside again.  As a matter of fact what the politicians, all of these politicians, Clinton, Perot, all of them, are saying exactly the same thing I told them in 1968.  You take the industry out of this country and you're going to have a big problem because everybody's going to be without a job and they're going to wonder what happened.  You can find billions of dollars to go to the Gulf.  Why can't you find billions of dollars to take care of the poor people in this country?  Why are we walking the streets?  A lot of those boys who went to wars and fought for this country.  I know that some people think I'm bitter and maybe in some respects I am bitter, and in very many ways I'm very angry because this is my country and we are entitled to fight for it from the inside.  And sometimes I think what happened?  I thought my country said that we have freedom from oppression? Freedom from hunger? Freedom of expression?  You can speak your mind as long as you're not hitting anybody over the head with a baseball bat, you're entitled to speak your mind.  We don't want to be on welfare.  We want jobs.  I want to have dignity and respect for myself, and this is what I feel about every one of us in the United States as well as the rest of the world.  But if you're going to pay people to stay poor, why not stay poor?  And if you get a job, if the job pay is as much as you can get from the welfare, you don't have to pay taxes on the welfare money but you have to pay taxes on the money that you get from a job.

7:45.  I'm terribly disappointed particularly in my own country that threw me out of work in this country for over 20 some odd years or whatever the figure might be and put me out of work.  I lost a lot of lucrative years, and then the disappointing thing too is that the American public and I didn't have a chance to grow up together, and they thought that I had either gotten out of the business, I died, or I had moved to Paris, or I had moved to some foreign country.  So no I never left America.  I have no intentions of leaving the United States.  But what goes around comes around . . . 

Monday, September 16, 2024

TOM WOODS: This is what you should do if losers from the regime like this show up

Remember, if you don't exercise your Liberty once in awhile, the Government will assume you're done with it.  --Matt Beebe 

Thank you to Tom Woods.   

Kauffman says, 

People sometimes ask me how I have the confidence to do this and the answer is that I practiced. 
Practice asserting your rights in minor situations and it will continue to get easier. 
For example, do it at DUI checkpoints or at border control when re-entering the US.

Friday, March 29, 2024

Why is the FBI wasting time on this? This seems to be a 1st amendment issue if they are trying to intimidate and interfere with speech.


 

Thursday, March 28, 2024

Wow. The FBI reportedly sent agents to a woman’s house in Stillwater, Oklahoma to question her over her political beliefs that she posted on Facebook.

Wednesday, December 27, 2023

The FBI was established in 1908, the CIA in '47, & the NSA in '52, which means the US existed for over 130 years without them. There's a reason these agencies weren't created by the Framers.

Friday, November 10, 2023

There is no place for a federal police force in the U.S. Constitution.  Our Founders probably understood the direction it would take if we did do so.  It's also why there's no standing army.

Let's look at some recent examples before we go back and look at the history of the FBI in ways in which it has always been problematized by its politicized character. So the nature of it has expanded and extended and has gone to a scale and a scope we have never witnessed before beginning with the election or just the campaign of President Trump.  Take for example the January 6th Proud Boys trial taking place currently in the District of Columbia.  In that case, there has been multiple documentation of the role of informants, infiltrators, and instigators in the events of January 6th.  I was there on January 6th. I decided not to take the unauthorized tour of the capital.  I was instead sitting in the office of some Trump cabinet officials as we ultimately watched it unfold.  I was there at the behest of President Trump after representing him in Georgia and challenging what was taking place in the election.  I would note that President Trump only filed one election contest himself that he was able to do legally and that took place in Georgia.  Even though the court was required to conduct a hearing within 5 days of his filing, on January 6th the Georgia Court had still just not gotten around in weeks after its filing to ever hearing the case.  Indeed, they wouldn't decide to hear it until after January 6th came and went.  In fact, there was never an evidentiary hearing on the election contest President Trump filed in Georgia.  It was amidst that frustration and agitation that people gathered that day on January 6th to hear the President speak and, as the President asked them to do, to peacefully protest outside the capitol to make sure that our Constitution's framework for adjudicating election disputes and controversies, which by the way despite what Vice President Mike Pence would have some people believe, both Vice President John Adams and Vice President Thomas Jefferson had exercised their Constitutional authority to decide electoral contests going back to the very founding of our country.  Then people got wind as they were outside the capitol that was not going to occur, Pence made the peculiar decision to wait to release his decision until right at the beginning of that presentation, which helped put certain things into motion.  But things were already in motion.  There was an unusual lack of law enforcement present that day.  The capitol is the most secure building in the world, particularly on January 6th.  There are over 2,500 people that are just police officers of the capitol.  Once again we may be seeing part of our problem.  Why does the capital even have a police?  If they had had regular local police there, is the issue of District Columbia have having its own patrol; that being a separate and secondary question.  But if it had had regular police not under political control, maybe they would have been properly present that day and there never would have been any issues because what happened was that there was an unusual lack of security in some parts of the capital number one number two there were other members of the police that were actually guiding protesters into a compressed compressed area where they would then be attacked by members of the Capitol Police that would lead to people reacting and responding and only the people that reacted and responded were caught on camera broadcast to the world or ultimately and ultimately prosecuted the capital police who initiated and instigated that conflict took a complete walk from any accountability and responsibility.  4:22. And then you had other capitol police who were escorting people into the building that day, while other Capitol police were attacking them from other parts of the building.  So if you had just stumbled into it, you didn't know what was happening.  It was still one of the most unusual Capitol riots in American history, and there have been plenty of capitol riots throughout our history, throughout the history of the world.  Around the world you can watch the protests currently taking place in France to see what real riots look like.  They usually involve farmers either farmers dumping food or manure, depending on their choice that day, on the public streets or people raiding into buildings or protesting BLM style as what took place in the summer of 2020 just a few months before January 6 protests.  While those people who that did the BLM protests, including threatening to burn down St John's, the great historic church across from the White House, not only did they not get criminally prosecuted, many of them actually got checks written from the federal government for the wrongful harassment they suffered from simply policing that building that day.  5:25.  Meanwhile people who took that unauthorized tour of the capital of that day had to be some of the most peaceful riders in the history of rioting these are the people who literally stayed between the lines half the time as they're walking through the capitol these are people who didn't steal any art the only thing they got taken was a now famously memed event someone who took Nancy Pelosi's pedestal with him there was a gentleman who put his feet up on Pelosi's desk.  What's undisclosed is what came out in his trial: it was the media asking him to put his feet on Pelosi's desk.  These are people who just came in often directed to go through there there were people around there were people like Mr Epps apparently Rupert Murdoch doesn't want people talking about Mr apps because Tucker Carlson the most popular TV News host in the Modern Age had to resign yesterday or was separated from his employment for talking about what according to the LA Times in the New York Times for talking about Ray Epps this was a very unusual case of the man who got a 60 Minutes profile while bragging in text to his kid about how he helped organize January 6th into an event to that could lead to people being criminally prosecuted and punished while he himself has never been criminally prosecuted and punished he's not the only one they found in the proud boys trial a friend of mine a colleague in Norman pattus is one of the defense lawyers and by the way in the old school Robert Kennedy Style Democratic liberal who is defending some of the proud boys including Joe Biggs in that trial has found more evidence of government misconduct and malfeasance and misfeasance then in any case he's ever been a part of and he's had the privilege of being a part of unfortunately two many in our legal system going on Decades of representation you can recognize Norm as an old civil rights Lefty because he still has a ponytail like that still popular as if it was then 1960s in that case what they found is now there now approaching over a hundred informants infiltrators and instigators that day people that were on the government payroll who were the ones directing people to go into the building directing the people to confront the capital police directing people to try to take things once they're inside the building directing people to be confrontational and that's just one aspect of the degree to which January 6th was very much a Fed-surrection not an insurrection.  7:53

Friday, September 15, 2023

William Null, twin brother Michael Null, and Eric Molitor were found not guilty. 14 charged; 9 others convicted

 Here is a little background.  

William Null, twin brother Michael Null and Eric Molitor were found not guilty of providing support for a terrorist act and a weapon charge. They were the last of 14 men to face charges in state or federal court. Nine others have been convicted.

Thursday, May 18, 2023

BANK OF AMERICA gave a list to the FBI of anyone who used BofA credit/debit cards in the DC area between Jan 5-7th, 2021 - regardless of whether they participated in the events of Jan. 6th.

Tuesday, August 9, 2022

As for the antics of the Democrats sending in the FBI to raid Trump's home and busting into his safe, there has never been any such incident in the entire history of the United States

Thank you to Martin Armstrong "FBI Raids Trump's Mar-a-Largo."

We have a very serious Constitutional Crisis unfolding that is simply unprecedented. Former President Donald Trump said on Monday that FBI agents had searched his Mar-a-Lago club and residence in Palm Beach, Fla., and broke into his safe. Both the FBI and Department of Justice have refused to comment on their actions. It is the Progressive Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y who has been pushing to raid Trump's home on the claim that this is an investigation related to the possible mishandling of government secret documents. 

The ONLY reason the government pulls off a raid like this rather than issue a subpoena is when they are investigating criminal activity as PRESUME the target is guilty and will NOT turn over any incriminating evidence. This is precisely what took place. They can pretend that the purpose of the raid was, was because the National Archives wanted to corroborate whether or not Donald Trump had any documents in his possession, they are treating Trump no different than a drug dealer. Anything they discover will not be used against him even if it is not related to the National Archives. So, that may be the excuse, but anything they can find on the January 6th "insurrection" they intend to conveniently use. They can even plant child pornography and claim they found it in his safe.

For months, Trump and his lawyers have worked collaboratively with them the National Archives. That is typically the way such things are handled. In fact, Trump's lawyer has said he is totally shocked: "I have such an amazing relationship with these people, and all of a sudden, on no notice, they send 20 cars and 30 agents?"

The Democrats are desperate to win in November. Right now, the polls for the Senate are just about tied. Biden may not last his term and cyclically he can be in trouble by July 3rd, 2023. The Democrats are really in a panic mode. They know 2022 will be a tough race. They actually think that by targeting Trump they can paint all Republicans with the same brush and they hope to win in November with a stronger majority.

However, we can see that we had a Panic Cycle in politics in 2021 which indeed followed the 2020 events and we have another in 2023 which will follow the 2022 election. This does not look good for the future, I warned that this would be a Panic Cycle in politics on a global scale in 2022 and this is unfolding far worse than even I ever could speculate on. I reported that my sources in Washington relayed that they were definitely looking to criminally charge Trump with "insurrection" to prevent him from running in 2024.

In the process, the Democrats are destroying the very fabric of the United States all to ensure that they will forcefully impose their will which is being directed by the World Economic Forum. This entire Climate Change agenda is to push for one world government at the United Nations over which we will have no right to vote for anything. This latest stunt to raid Trump's home pretending to be looking for documents for the National Archives is just the cover story. Whatever they find they will use and suddenly claim - oh gee! Look what we found by mistake!

The Democrats are looking to alter America and remain in power by sheer force. Even the Spanish Civil War was very similar. The nation was evenly divided and Spain became very polarized. The resolution was that the military step in. Goya's famous painting showing how the military began just executing people is by no means out of the question because humanity never changes - obedience to authority (Stanley Milgram).

As we are approaching the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence in 2026, the Democrats are toying with what will most likely end in a civil war and the destruction of the United States. I have been warning that the United States will divide. Our model on the separatist movement in the United States is 19 intervals of 8.6 or 163.4 years. That means the civil war began in 1861.279 bringing us to 2024.679. In all honesty, 2024 does not look very good.

As for the antics of the Democrats sending in the FBI to raid Trump's home and busting into his safe, there has never been any such incident in the entire history of the United States. No former president has ever been indicted for any criminal conduct. This has not been because there was never such an incident. Most importantly, the historic precedent is that post-term indictment is NOT legally allowed.

Americans don’t like the idea of criminalizing politics. Just look at Ukraine. In January 2022, Ukraine’s former president, Petro Poroshenko, landed in Kyiv and was charged with Treason by Zelensky in a case that illustrates the danger of criminalizing politics. So many other banana republics do the same. Once one party gets a hold of power, they try to prosecute the opposition.

Up until now, both political parties, as well as the public, see the prospect of post-term immunity as a guarantee that the country’s politics will remain civil and that power will transition peacefully from one party to the other. All of that is now crumbling before our eyes. That very precedent is what drove President Gerald Ford to pardon Richard Nixon. It was also the reason why the Office of the Independent Counsel decided not to indict former President Bill Clinton for perjury.

Former U.S. President Donald Trump said on Monday that his Mar-A-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida, was been raided by FBI agents. “After working and cooperating with the relevant Government agencies, this unannounced raid on my home was not necessary or appropriate,” Trump announced in a statement.

NEVER in the history of the United States has the FBI ever carried out such a raid. Trump publicly stated that his home was “under siege, raided, and occupied by a large group of FBI agents.” He also said that: “They even broke into my safe.”

Our computer has warned that 2022 would be a Panic Cycle in Politics and 2023 will be a violent year for civil unrest and war. The computer pinpoints these events that we cannot even begin to imagine the fundamentals behind them in advance. But the Democrats have crossed the line. They are now trying to transform the United States into a banana republic of oppression and a direct assault on the very foundation of democracy. The nation has been polarized to the extreme. This is just going to put it over the top.

I have been warning that we would have a geopolitical event in August/September which will be a Panic Cycle. The computer does not always explain in detail such events as we have just witnessed. Nevertheless, for whatever reason, they seem to unfold according to the targets provided even if we do not understand what they are in advance.

We have a Panic Cycle in two weeks and a turning point in the last week of August to the first week of September. Keep in mind that the Democrats are doing this just ahead of the election to desperately try to influence the election in November. All they will do is polarize the nation even more and with the computer targeting 2023 for civil unrest, it looks like we better stock up on food.

Tuesday, July 12, 2022

James Ehren Knowles in the Capitol building. The Gateway Pundit has named him as the "Confidential Human Source" who was spying on the Proud Boys for the FBI

Wednesday, June 1, 2022

Perkins Coie, the legal arm of the DNC and Hillary Clinton, admits they have been operating an FBI workspace in their Washington, D.C. office since 2012