Showing posts with label 2024. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2024. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 2, 2024

CALLEY MEANS: How tobacco companies began controlling food companies! 70% of our food is a science experiment!!

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

"typhoid, smallpox, measles, scarlet fever, whooping cough and diphtheria . . . the chance is very remote indeed that any of them will ever again assume sufficient importance in the mortality tables seriously to affect the general death rate.” ― Dr. Louis Dublin, 1935.

BEFORE there was the DTP. BEFORE there was the MMR. England's whooping cough and measles deaths were down over 99% BEFORE the vaccines in 1957 and 1968. “All of the old menaces like typhoid, smallpox, measles, scarlet fever, whooping cough and diphtheria have become minor causes of death. The chance is very remote indeed that any of them will ever again assume sufficient importance in the mortality tables seriously to affect the general death rate.” ― Dr. Louis Dublin, 1935.

Dr. Louis Dublin, “Better Economic Conditions Felt in Fewer Deaths,” Berkley Daily Gazette, December 27, 1935. 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

DR. SHAWN BAKER: They knew vegetable oils were bad decades ago!!

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

RICHARD POE: A 2019 investigative report in The Star (Kenya) states that http://Wikileaks.org was registered in Nairobi in Oct. 2006. It shared a PO Box with Mars Group Kenya, an NGO partly funded by the UK’s Department for International Development (DFID)

Thanks to Polly St. George. 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,

GREG REESE: Chevron deference: It's how OSHA was able to decide that everyone who worked for a large company had to get the jab or be fired. No law gave them that authority. They just made it up.

Greg Reese on the Chevron Deference, 

It's how OSHA, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, was able to decide that everyone who worked for a large company had to get the jab or be fired.  No law gave them that authority.  They just made it up.  

It's how the ATF, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, was able to decide a piece of plastic was a machine gun.  

It's how the USDA's Natural Resources Conservation Service, the NRCS, is able to decide that a small puddle is a protected wetland.  --Greg Reese

1:40. A family fishing company, Loper Bright Enterprises, was being driven out of business because they couldn't afford the $700 per day they were being charged by the NMFS, the National Marine Fisheries Service to monitor their company.  The thing is federal law doesn't authorize the NMFS to charge businesses for this.  They just decided to start doing it in 2013.  Why did they think they could get away with just charging people without any legal authorization?  Because in 1984 in the Chevron decision, the Supreme Court decided that regulatory agencies were the experts in their field, and the courts should defer to their interpretation of the law.  So for the past 40 years, federal agencies have been able to interpret laws to mean whatever they want, and the courts had to just go with it.  It was called "Chevron deference," and it put bureaucrats in charge of the country.  

It's how OSHA, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, was able to decide that everyone who worked for a large company had to get the jab or be fired.  No law gave them that authority.  They just made it up.  

It's how the ATF, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, was able to decide a piece of plastic was a machine gun.  

It's how the USDA's Natural Resources Conservation Service, the NRCS, is able to decide that a small puddle is a protected wetland.  

It's how out-of-control agencies have been able to create rules out of thin air and force you to comply, and the courts had to simply defer to them because they were the experts.  

Imagine if your local police could just arrest you for any reason, and no judge or jury was allowed to determine if you'd actually committed a crime or not, just off to jail you go.  That's what "Chevron deference" was.  It was not only blatantly unconstitutional, it caused immeasurable harm to everyone.  Thankfully, it's now gone.  We haven't even begun to feel the effects of this decision in the courts.  It will be used for years to come to roll back federal agencies, and we'll all be better off for it.  And that's why politicians and corporate media are freaking out about it.

Spike Cohen,

In an era of bad news, the US Supreme Court has brought us some good tools that we the people can wield to work on restoring America.  Happy Independence Day.  

Reporting for Infowars this is Greg Reese. 

As a follow-up, please read this by James T. Moodey @ Lew Rockwell.  Looks like there was momentum building for this at least since last year, January 2023.  Check out Judge Napolitano's essay, titled, "A Government by Experts," January 12, 2023.

Tom Luongo has got his claws on this as well at least since March 23, 2024, 

This is yet another example of the desperate need for the Supreme Court to take up the Chevron Deference and strike it down. The agencies should not be making law. That’s Congress’ job.

And I don’t care if Congress is allergic to doing its job, new emission regulations should not be in the hands of unelected bureaucrats run by chiefs who are chosen by the current political party. 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,

MANOOKIAN: we're in the middle of World War 2, and Congress passes something called the Public Health Services Act, 1944?

Leslie Manookian.   

🔥"[T]his Chevron case is huge...because it means that the courts will no longer defer to the administrative agencies or to these federal agencies...they actually have to be held accountable and prove in a court of law that the rules that they are issuing are based on science..." Writer, filmmaker, former Wall St. business executive, and President of the Health Freedom Defense Fund (@theHFDF) Leslie Manookian (@LeslieManookian) describes for Brandon Bushong of TrialSite News (@TrialsiteN) why the Supreme Court overturning the long-standing Chevron doctrine is such a big (positive!) development.

Transcription of the clip: "It's a huge, huge case. So there's been a Supreme Court case called Chevron versus Natural Resources Defense Council that's been in place since 1984, and this has been controlling law across the entire country. What it says is that if so when we sued CDC, the court, when we sued CDC over its mask mandate, and defeated it, the court is required to give deference to the agency if there's some question about, interpretation of the law. Okay? And that's not what happened in our case because we argued that the CDC had overstepped its lawful, authority under the Administrative Procedure Act. "But, basically, there was a case called Loper Bright Enterprises in front of the Supreme Court. And what happened was EPA ordered this...fishery group, Loper Bright Enterprises, to take on board an observer and pay for him or her, someone who would ensure and this is a small group, small business, ensure that they are not overfishing, and they had to pay for it. And so, basically, it was this massive overstepping of authority. So what Chevron doctrine says is that if there's an issue before the courts involving a federal agency, then the courts should defer to the expertise in terms of interpreting...the intentions of Congress, but also the expertise of the agency itself. And, therefore, its rules should be upheld. "Well, the Supreme Court right now does not seem very favorably inclined on that, and there have been several cases where the power of the agencies have been overturned in the last couple of years. There was one...when the CDC issued the eviction moratorium in...I don't know if it was 2020 or 2021, that was overturned. "And so, basically, this has huge implications for us because what's been happening for the last 40, 50, 60, 70 years, really since 1944 when the Public Health Services Act was implemented in the middle of war, which I find very bizarre. You know, we're in the middle of World War 2, and Congress passes something called the Public Health Services Act, which grants all of this power to the CDC, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the FDA. And, what's happened now as a result of this overturning of Chevron is that they're going to be held accountable. They're gonna be held to a higher threshold than they were because they've been given all this deference for the last 40 years. And many critics of the Chevron deference is, their opinion is and it and I agree with this, that what's happened as a result of Chevron is that...a fourth branch of government has developed, the administrative state. "All of these agencies are what make up the administrative state, and they are all underneath the federal, branch of government. So, you know, we've got the Executive, the President. You've got the Legislative, Congress, and you've got the judiciary, all the courts. But now you've got this fourth branch, this huge administrative state, which is unelected and unaccountable to the electorate. And they sit under the President, and this is exactly what happened. When President Biden was elected and inaugurated, in his first full day in office, he instructed the CDC to issue the mask mandate, and they dutifully did so in one week. "This was not something that Congress had told them to do or delegated power to them to do. It was purely an administrative and executive order. And so what's happened is the growth of the administrative state has really destabilized the balance of power in our system and given way, way too much power to the executive. And so this Chevron case is huge for us because it means that the courts will no longer defer to the administrative agencies or to these federal agencies whether they're health or environmental or anything else, they actually have to be held accountable and prove in a court of law that the rules that they are issuing are based on science, fact, and have a true public interest. "This is very, very big, and it has an impact for all of us in the Health Freedom arena."

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Monday, July 1, 2024

John Deere is moving manufacturing to Mexico as it conducts massive layoffs in Illinois and Iowa

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,

[RG911Team] Controlled demolition is so sophisticated that even the experts fail sometimes.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

MCKERNAN: The ‘Experts’ are the least informed people in the room. Unaccountability affords [them] to be asleep on the literature.

4:43, HOST. Robert it used to take about 10 years for a vaccine to be approved should we have trusted something coming out of the market so quickly after 12 months maximum of testing?

4:48, PROF. ROBERT BODY. Yes it was less than 12 months those vaccines were based on 10 years of experience using the mRNA platform using the viral Vector platforms with different diseases ten years earlier so we had more up Our Sleeve than people thought and what they did was to run parallel studies of phase one and then Phase 2 then phase 3 phase 3 proving it was effective in tens of thousands.  So that they sped it up but they didn't cut corners the safety was an issue and we do recognize that that AstraZeneca vaccine was associated with the risk clots and did result in serious cases. 

5:30. what didn't we know that at the time though if there was a 10 years of research beforehand?

5:34. Because it had never been given to tens of thousands you only found it out when tens of thousands got it because the risk was about 1 in 50,000, but if you got COVID the risk was 5 to 10 times higher.  So if we'd let rip and got COVID we'd have people having Delta and getting clots in their lungs and in their brains at a probably 10 times higher rate. 

5:59. Let's go to the audience now I know there's a lot of questions out there this evening.

6:02, AMANDA. I wanted to ask like when will there actually be a proper acknowledgment by the government as to actual vaccine injury?  My life changed on September 10th 2021 within 2 hours I started having an adverse reaction to Pfizer I've now been bed bound pretty much for two and a half years I slipped between the cracks I'm under the care of a neurologist, two gastroenterologists, a cardiologist.  I fundamentally got long-haul covid from the vaccine because I already had a heightened immune system.

6:38. Look I'm not sure I can give you an apology from anyone here tonight, but let's just try to get a better understanding. Robert, one of the things I worry about in the messaging at the time, and the media is part of this as well, there were problems.  "I'm feeling serious side effects."  They weren't listened to.  To a degree, they were ignored, and that I think we can all acknowledge was a mistake and as we are hearing from the audience now, they're real.

7:04. Absolutely.  The TGA had A system that advised Health practitioners and even the general public to notify side effects so they weren't being ignored might have been downplayed by some people but at the very top of the TGA we cared about it and we did research on it we know for example that the mechanism for the clotting is a platelet Factor 4 antibody.  It's not from anti-phospholipid.  It's a very specific thing that causes the clotting after AstraZeneca vaccine so we are continuing to research that and there are thousands of medical people working on that.

7:44. Anastasia you're a chief Health officer who had serious concerns over the AstraZeneca vaccine she writes that Jeanette young didn't want under 40s taking that brand AstraZeneca due to possible side effects.  Just remember some of those comments this is June 2021.

I don't want an 18-year-old in Queensland dying from a clotting illness who if they got COVID probably wouldn't die.  --Jeanette Young, Queensland Chief Health Officer, 2005-2021

That engineered afeared criticism of your government at the time. What do you look back now on her comments?  

8:16, ANNASTACIA PALASZCZUK. I also said the same thing so we were in unison in relation to that. The health advice was clearly that AstraZeneca should not be given to people under 40.  There had been some results that had come in from the United Kingdom where I think around 40 people had passed away due to AstroZeneca we went out publicly and we were attacked savagely as being anti the vaccine we were not anti the vaccine.  We were anti the vaccine being administered to young people to young people under the age of 40, and especially women.

8:56, AUDIENCE MEMBER.  I was one of the few people in the legal sector who took on the TGA and the rest of the government establishment for government corruption and medical corruption my question to you is as a person who is not vaccinated who did not take a single covid-19 vaccine why isn't there a research done three years in now comparing the immune systems of those who got the first dose the second dose and the third dose and the aftermath and the latency. Compared to how the non-vaccinated are faring right now we have a society that is chronically ill in winter season and it is not the unvaccinated.

10:00, PROF. ROBERT BODY. Australia has among the best immunologists in the world and we won two Nobel prizes we do take that seriously we do look at the responses to vaccination we do look at people who have had no exposure to covid or vaccination and their immune systems are compared so you're wrong.  As to being, healthy that's great. I'm really pleased for you.  But the people who have covid and who have not been vaccinated get more severe disease and they're more likely to get long COVID.

10:30, ASSOC. PROF. SENANAYAKE.  Once the vaccines get rolled out and now we've had over 12 13 billion doses given worldwide the research doesn't stop it's not like you know we got to phase three let's roll it out we've got phase four trials the data is being collected and collected and collected and if we're going to see really really rare side effects, we've had 14-17 billion doses to see those but we haven't heard of anything unusual at this point but we will keep looking.  I disagree with that.  

11:07, PROF. ROBERT BODY. Can I just say that I totally encourage people to who've had a vaccine and they've got an effect a side effect to report it and the TGA will look at it closely and will collect the information and will examine it it's important that you notify and it's important that people follow it up.

11:27.  PROF. G. FOSTER.  I think that's what you are seeing here is a symptom of a modern problem that we have with people who are often making decisions in positions of authority they're trying to do the right thing I think usually very separated from kind of the people on the street and the people on the street are getting their information from sources other than the main stream news other than than the health head of the department in various States other than the mainstream peer-reviewed journals there getting their information from a lot of Independent Media a lot of independent Scholars some of them who are extremely good and I would very strongly recommend that you guys have a look at non mainstream sources of information you may just discover something.

12:15. ASSOC. PROF. SENANAYAKE.  One of the major things at the who has said to continue dealing with covid is to look at this information and address it.

Professor Robert Body.

Associate Professor Sanjaya Senanayake.

Professor Gigi Foster. 

14:08. 

Professor Kerryn Phelps developed dysautonomia.  Her partner, Jackie Stricker Phelps, had anaphylaxis to food before.  

15:00, JACKIE STICKER PHELPS.

What didn't I suffer?  I'm not an anti-vaxxer.  I had anaphylaxis to foods before and I was really worried about anaphylaxis.  So we went along to the hospital where they had medical help if I had anaphylaxis, and they gave me the needle.  Within five minutes after getting vaccinated, she said that her "head nearly blew off [her] body.  [Her] face went bright red.  [Her] vision was impaired.  [She] couldn't hear.  [Her] feet went numb; [her] hands went numb.  [She] had paraesthesia all over her body.  And from that minute, [her] hair started falling out.  [She] could hardly walk.  For the next three years, it's three years since the 15th of May this year, since [she] had that Pfizer shot.  It has ruined [her] life.  It has made me hide away from people because [her] specialists have said that if she catches COVID, that'll be the end of [her].  So I can't have any more vaccines, and [she] wouldn't go near them with a 10-foot barge pole.  It is neurological and rheumatological.  It's caused ongoing problems for [her], and [she's] had to have a chair lift put into her house because she cannot walk up and down stairs anymore.  

HOST.  Medically is there anything to learn from people who have had side effects that both of you are describing in detail?

16:24. There is so much to learn there is an incredible lack of medical curiosity about investigating this TGA take the reports apparently there have been 144,000 adverse reaction reports but that's a drop in the ocean compared to the number of actual adverse reactions that there are because a lot of them aren't being reported.  Because certainly in the early days they weren't being recognized so there is so much that needs to happen to engage with people who have suffered vaccine injuries and for us to move forward.

16:58. And to provide compensation because the compensation scheme is hopeless.  And when the adverse reactions happen and people try to make a claim and some people their lives have been destroyed . . .

STRICKER PHELPS. Three years, three years I have suffered, and they said you don't fit our compensation scheme.  

KERRYN PHELPS. The criteria are extremely narrow and it doesn't anywhere near cover the breadth of adverse reactions that people are suffering. 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

Study says it's better to eat two burger than one with fries

"Why Two Burgers Can Be Healthier For You Than Eating One Burger And Fries," Business Insider, Erin Brodwin, November 2, 2017.

"Nutritionist explains why having two burgers is sometimes healthier than one," ShortList, Tom Victor, November 12, 2018.

"Want to Feel Full?  Eating Two Burgers Is Better for Your Health than Ordering Fries," Newsweek, Melissa Matthews, November 7, 2017.

"Eating Two Burgers Is Better than Eating One with Fries," DMARGE, Max Langridge, August 15, 2021.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

Grains Are Depression Foods?

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Sunday, June 30, 2024

BROOK JACKSON: What does overturning Chevron mean? Let's consider an actual case involving FDA - Bruesewitz v. Wyeth.

Chevron Deference Aspect: The court acknowledged FDA's expertise & regulatory authority in approving & monitoring vaccines. The court implicitly deferred to the FDA's judgment that vaccines are safe & effective when they meet regulatory standards, thus preempting state law claims based on design defects. What are the implications of overruling Chevron Deference:

Courts would independently interpret the NCVIA & other relevant laws without automatically deferring to the FDA's expertise. WIN!! Brook Jackson

🚨What does overturning Chevron mean? Let's consider an actual case involving FDA - Bruesewitz v. Wyeth. Background: The case involved Hannah Bruesewitz, who suffered seizures & developmental problems after receiving a DTP vaccine manufactured by Wyeth, now a part of Pfizer. The family sued Wyeth, claiming the vaccine was defectively designed. Legal Context: The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 established a no-fault compensation program for vaccine injury claims & removed the liability of vaccine manufacturers. The FDA's role in approving vaccines & its interpretation of safety standards were central to the case. Court's Decision: In 2011, SCOTUS ruled in favor of Wyeth, holding that the NCVIA preempts all design-defect claims against vaccine manufacturers brought by plaintiffs seeking compensation for injury or death caused by vaccine side effects. Chevron Deference Aspect: The court acknowledged FDA's expertise & regulatory authority in approving & monitoring vaccines. The court implicitly deferred to the FDA's judgment that vaccines are safe & effective when they meet regulatory standards, thus preempting state law claims based on design defects. What are the implications of overruling Chevron Deference: Courts would independently interpret the NCVIA & other relevant laws without automatically deferring to the FDA's expertise. WIN!! Plaintiffs might be more likely to challenge FDA approved vaccines in court, arguing that the FDA's safety standards or approval processes are insufficient or flawed. WIN!!
Courts would scrutinize FDA decisions more closely, likely leading to different outcomes in cases involving vaccine injuries or side effects. WIN!!

Vaccine manufacturers will face more uncertainty regarding liability & regulatory standards impacting vaccine development & availability. WIN!! 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Carnivore is the least expensive way to eat?

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

[RG911Team] FDNY Captain Richard Patterson has a lot to say about 9/11… and the media won’t dare to air it. Preview of the truth that is too dangerous to televise

Topics covered: Explosions at the Twin Towers; Picking up Aircraft Parts; Paramilitary at Building 7. 

Richard Gage writes, 

Captain Richard Patterson, FDNY, ret., was himself an institution within the New York Fire Department. He was off-duty in uptown NYC on 9/11 but made his way down to the World Trade Center by hitching a ride in an ambulance.

He was carrying out duties just outside the North Tower when he was knocked back by explosions. He survived, but lost 41 firefighters that morning—brothers who he knew personally. He saw the jumpers from the towers, and he picked up body parts from the aftermath of the explosive destruction.

He is my guest today on RichardGage911: UNLEASHED!

Captain Patterson has a Bachelor of Arts in Fire Service Administration from John Jay College and 20 years as a firefighter. 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

ROMAN BYSTRIANYK: Year after year, decade after decade, medical “error” is the 3rd leading cause of death. Where are the murder trials then, or at least negligent homicide?

Here you've got Peter Dutton praising Scott Morrison, the great leader and official scumbag of Australia.  Is Peter Dutton gay?  By "sacrifice," does Peter mean payout?  I mean since all of these guys are in charge simply to protect both international and domestic rackets. 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , ,

ROSA KOIRE: this is "regionalization and world government: You use trade agreements to destroy boundaries and you actually cannot make local law that breaks those treaties.

"This breaks national boundaries, it breaks state boundaries, it breaks county boundaries. It's also a project of the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation," the late author says. She adds that this is "regionalization and world government: You use trade agreements to destroy boundaries and you actually cannot make local law that breaks those treaties." --Rosa Koire,

Full video. 

 

"I found out about this because I saw that people were not being able to use their land, and I looked behind that, and I found Agenda 21," Koire says. She adds, "The federal government of the United States is doing this—is in [the] process of creating 'mega-regions,' which are, essentially, crossing national boundaries." Koire highlights one specific region, "Cascadia," which will be made up of a portion of Washington state, Oregon state, Idaho, and even Vancouver. Koire notes that the "Southern California and Texas triangle areas" will include parts of Mexico.

"This breaks national boundaries, it breaks state boundaries, it breaks county boundaries. It's also a project of the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation," the late author says. She adds that this is "regionalization and world government: You use trade agreements to destroy boundaries and you actually cannot make local law that breaks those treaties." 

Behind the Green Mask: U.N. Agenda 21, Rosa Koire, 2011.

Interesting, or telling, that Amazon does not allow its affiliate customers to post a direct link to social media for this product, er, ahem, book. 



Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,

9:40. There were 18 votes on Ukraine, and I voted against every single one of them since 2014 when we started saber rattling.  We do these non-binary resolutions where, you know, "Russia is evil," "We support democracy," and even then we knew that Ukraine was corrupt as hell.

CARLSON: The most corrupt country in Europe by far.

MASSIE:  So there been 16 or 20 votes on Ukraine, and I've been against all of those.  Just in the last 7 months there have been 30 votes on Israel and the Middle East.

CARLSON:  How many votes on the US border during that time?  

10:22. Maybe 4 show votes where we know that they were going nowhere in the Senate.  Look, we have a name 30 post offices.  Last month we voted 15 or 16 times on issues related to Israel and I've been hit because I vote no on all of those.

CARLSON:  Why do you do that, because you hate Israel?

MASSIE:  No, because I'm against sending our money overseas.  I am against starting another proxy war.  I'm against sanctions, because it's going to weaken the dollars and that's why I can't vote for them.

CARLSON:  Tell us what the Free Speech part of it is.

MASSIE:  Recently they brought a bill to Congress, and this is actually a binding bill, not a non-binding resolution like this was going to have the effect of law and people would get prosecuted if they engaged in any anti-semitism on campuses.  And the problem with this bill is they use some International definition of antisemitism on a website somewhere?  My first question is, why don't you just put the definition in the bill?  Why are you pointing to somebody's URL in a piece of legislation?

CARLSON, 11:35. You are the Congress, right?  You write the laws . . . .

MASSIE: Right, we are the Congress.  We should be writing the laws.  Instead, we are referencing a website that's not even hosted in the United States.  And so I went to this website, and it's got a fairly short definition but it's also got examples of things that would be considered anti-semitism.  Some of these are actually passages in the New Testament, if you will, would be banned by this International definition of anti-semitism.  For instance, saying that Jews killed Jesus, which is as you know in the Bible.  He was not welcome among his own people, okay, and so that would be anti-semitism.  And if you engaged in that on campus or just offered that as a thought, say, in a classroom, it would be anti-semitic and you would run afoul of the Department of Education in some federal law.  There were other examples in there that were hard to believe.  For instance, comparing the policies of Israel to the Nazi regime would be anti-semitic.  But the question is what if their policies ever became the same?  Is this a static definition? 

CARLSON:  Or what if we just have different opinions, and now your opinion is a crime? 

MASSIE, 12:52. Right


Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Friday, June 28, 2024

The truth behind the “You Are What You Eat” experiment!!!

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

These are the blackened lungs of a 52-year-old man who smoked a pack of cigarettes a day for 30 years.

Thank you to Wejolyn. 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

ERIC HUNLEY: Legal Friday, June 28, 2024

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)