Hunter opens up with a Christmas greeting and then tries to console himself over the loss of his friend, CNN and ABC investigative reporter, Drew Griffin, who was a staple here on LA's ABC Eye Witness News on Channel 7 for years.
Fitts has said that with so many people dying that there will be a glut of things in the market form people's deaths that it will have a deflationary effect on the economy. People are going to see what's been done to them. Are you seeing this unfolding now?
Fitts references the Skidmore Survey from January 2022. The survey showed that not only were there a significant number of adverse events--deaths and injuries--but there was a significant number of people who understood that it was coming from the injections. The media has done a remarkably good job at painting a different picture, but at some point you can't defy reality. So that's coming out and we're seeing it translate into market action. So in one day we see the insurance companies trading down 30% and funerals trading up 20%, that's a 50% divergence. So integrating into people lives and their health and in market reaction, it's hard to deny reality. The Doctors 4 COVID Ethics did their 5th symposium on December 19. Sasha Latypova's "Intent to Do Harm" makes the compelling case that this was not a vaccine, not a pharmaceutical, not a medicine. She said it's a weapon. The variability in the batches is far too great for it to be classified or described as a medicine or pharmaceutical. Of course, if you look at the damage it's caused you can only therefore describe as a weapon. And she's very experienced. I mean this is a pharmaceutical executive, somebody coming from the industry, and really knows the ins and outs, the definitions, and legal definitions, regulations, etc. We're now staring down the barrel of a mass atrocity. This is a mass atrocity. This is a depopulation. This is a genocide. We're still struggling to find words to describe this. If you look at the economic restrictions that introduced this it probably killed more people than the injections. The deaths and injuries are more significant than popularly understood.
5:35. Hunter raises the question of finances. They're running our of money They can't pay social security. They can't pay the pensions. Is this the motivation behind it?
Something this big has more than one goal, multiple functions, called stacking functions One, they do want to reset the financial system because we gave had a financial coup d'eta ss to knowledge, and to dramatically increase their political and economic power. But there's something else. If you look at the central banking warfare model that's run the west for centuries now, if you're the central bankers you cannot maintain control unless you use digital technology to go to complete control. So digital technology gives the planet the ability for the general population to dramatically increase their learning speed, to dramatically increase their political and economic power unless the central bankers use it for central control. So you're staring down a situation that is a prisoner's dilemma: you either assert complete control or you lose control. And I think the central bankers have decided, and the question is why, for a variety of reasons, they're going to assert central control. They have 10 to 20 years to do it and that's what they're moving to do. They want to chip people like livestock, mind control them like live stock, and have complete control. They don't want to brook any opposition. And so they're implementing a control system. It's no longer going to be a financial system. It's going to be a straight out transaction control system. And they're saying no freedom of transaction, no freedom of health choices, no freedom of anything. We want complete control, and unfortunately it looks like that is coming with a form of slavery that is far worse, in my opinion, than historical forms of slavery because it's so physically invasive. But, now, we're talking about significant depopulation.
8:10. HUNTER. Why do they think they can get away with this?
8:13. FITTS. One theory: one scientist who I know and who I have great respect for believes that a lot of what's happened in the last 3 years was to sufficiently terrorize the population to go along with being injected, chipped, and controlled. Terrorization as a form of marketing the control they want. Part of this is to put people in fear. Most important for 2023 is to get out of fear and stay out of fear. That means being careful not to ingest a lit if TV and not ingesting a lit if mind-control technology. The reason they think they can get away with it, Greg, is because they've gotten away with ir so far. I've always said that the crime that pays is the crime that stays. And what we've watched since 1998 is an influential coup and that they've gotten away with it, and the more they get people to ingest massive amounts of propaganda, subliminal programming, all the mind-control tricks. Now they know that can't last forever, which is why they're talking about putting a chip in you or a neural link in your head all these crazy things. That's to assert complete control even when you disagree with them. They can shut down your disagreement.
Find extended notes here.
