Somebody above the level of our government is giving the orders.
The W.H.O. has become a trap to entrap the nations such that they lose sovereignty over health.
We are undergoing a soft coup.
And the idea is to create a whole new set of laws and ignore the existing human rights laws.
Dr. Meryl Nass's license is currently suspended in the state of Maine. "Maine doctor's license suspended over Covid-19 claims." The original reason was for spreading misinformation also for prescribing Ivermectin in hydroxychloroquine she took an oath to care for her patience and I guess they expect her to break that oath.
Spreading misinformation? Misinformation is not a crime. Misinformation is mistaken things, and I was actually telling the truth, so it wasn't any misinformation. The federal government and the states are trying to make everybody think that misinformation is a crime, and you should be reporting doctors and professionals who are spreading this information. So strangers reported her to the board. Oh she was spreading this information on the internet we have something called the First Amendment Free Speech as well as freedom of religion and the press and assembly and it's against the law for governments to suppress your free speech and the Board of Medicine is a state government agency so they were actually breaking the law and now we are suing them for a malicious prosecution which they used their role you know under cover of law "Doc Suspended for COVID Misinfo Sues, Cites Freedom of Speech," Michael DePeau-Wilson, Enterprise & Investigative Writer MedPage August 21, 2023. You're actually suing the medical board and am I wrong, are you also suing every individual on the board . . . every individual in their personal capacity
In the FDA claimed when they were under oath that they never stopped anybody from using Ivermectin. They said that you can use it whenever you want. How is it a medical board is even allowed to say that it is misinformation and taking someone's license without scientific studies, peer-reviewed, double-blind, randomized controlled trials that I reckon was dangerous which would be difficult to do since Millions of people take it every year for lupus.
So it isn't illegal. it's perfectly legal to prescribe those drugs, and the Board should have known that. They had 3 lawyers on the board and a doctor on staff, and then they have about 8 doctors on the members. So they all knew that they were writing off-label medicine. A lot of doctors don't really understand the legal underpinnings of medicine. By the time it came to a hearing, they dropped all of those charges. They did not want to litigate against the First Amendment. They did not want to litigate against off-label prescribing. They said "We don't want to talk about the vaccine either. Take the vaccine out of this case." But they knew what the law was so they were heavying me, and I was supposed to roll over and give them a win that they could put in the national news, which my case went into the national news. And I think they were shocked that I actually fought back. That wasn't part of their equation. I was 70 years old. Clearly it was going to cost me more money than I would be able to make over the rest of my career to compensate. And Children's Health Defense said they would fund my defense. That was what allowed me to do this.
