Debrah Birx admitted that the covid policies were a "science experiment"

Debrah Birx admitted that the covid policies were a "science experiment"

Let's try a little syllogism, shall we

A) Nuremberg code: "Don't be like Nazis & experiment on people"

B) Birx experimented on the whole of society to devastating effect

ERGO,

C) Birx is like a Nazi https://t.co/MEc67HZ2Is

— Ashmedai (@Ashmedaidemon) August 23, 2023

INTERESTING: A team from the UK has filed a complaint with the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court on behalf of the people

A team from the UK has filed a complaint with the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court on behalf of the people. The report alleges that government officials, pharmaceutical executives, and others profiting from the pandemic have violated the Nuremberg Code, committed war crimes and crimes against humanity, as well as aggression against civilians. The 44-page complaint extensively lists the crimes committed by the following individuals:

The complaint states that the aforementioned individuals have committed the following crimes:

Violations of the Nuremberg Code

Violation of Article 6 of the Rome Statute, Genocide

Violation of Article 7 of the Rome Statute, Crimes Against Humanity

Violation of Article 8 of the Rome, War Crimes

Violation of Article 8 bis3 of the Rome Statute, Crimes of Aggression

The document contains a lot of detailed information that I will summarize:

COVID Is a Biological Weapon – Gain of Function Research

COVID was created in a laboratory. Leo Poon. Dr. Li-Meng Yan and her team published a report (Appendix 4) claiming that the novel coronavirus was developed “as a laboratory product created by using bat coronaviruses ZC45 and/or ZXC21 as a template and/or backbone.” ZC45 and ZXC21 were discovered between July 2015 and February 2017 in military research laboratories. Once the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Centre, a non-military laboratory, published a conflicting report and was quickly forced by the government to retract its statement. “The existing scientific publications supporting a natural origin theory rely heavily on a single piece of evidence – a previously discovered bat coronavirus named RaTG13, which shares a 96% nucleotide sequence identity with SARS-CoV-2.”

Again, all evidence discredits the notion that the COVID-19 virus developed naturally. “The National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the USA has admitted to funding gain of function research on bat coronaviruses at China’s Wuhan lab – despite Dr Anthony Fauci repeatedly denying this.” There is clear evidence that the NIH funded gain of function research between 2014 and 2019. A $3.1 million grant was awarded to EcoHealth Alliance for coronavirus studies on bats. Another grant of $599,000 was provided to the Wuhan Institute of Virology to also study COVID in bats.

Conclusion: The coronavirus did not develop naturally. Rather, the virus was deliberately created in a laboratory after years of government-funded research.

Experimental Vaccines

The vaccine received temporary authorization under Regulation 174 of the Human Medicine Regulations Act (2012). The report notes that mRNA vaccines have never been approved for human usage and the effects are completely unknown. “The long-term effects and safety of the treatment in recipients are unknown. It is important to note that the Corona Virus ‘vaccines’ are the world’s first introduction to the synthetic m-RNA technology and all previous immunisations [sic] worked in a totally different manner, by way of introducing a deactivated or weakened virus to the body to trigger a natural arousal of the immune system against it.”

The COVID vaccination should be categorized as a gene therapy as it does not meet the requirements for the term “vaccine.” In February 2021, Merriam-Webster changed the definition of “vaccine” to include the COVID-19 mRNA injection. Dr. Mike Yeadon stated in the report: “It’s not a vaccination. It’s not prohibiting infection. It’s not a prohibiting transmission device. It’s a means by which your body is conscripted to make the toxin that then allegedly your body somehow gets used to dealing with it, but unlike a vaccine, which is to trigger the immune response, this is to trigger the creation of the toxin.”

Conclusion: The COVID-19 injection is not a vaccine, but rather a mass experimental form of gene therapy with unknown consequences.

Presence of Graphene Hydroxide in Vaccines

German chemist Dr. Andreas Noack was one of the EU’s top graphene and carbon experts who formulated his doctoral thesis by converting graphene oxide into graphene hydroxide. Dr. Noack examined the vaccines along with other experts and found that the vaccines contain graphene hydroxide. “On November 23, 2021, Dr. Andreas Noack released a video explaining what graphene hydroxide is and how the nanostructures injected into the human body act as ‘razor blades’ inside the veins of ‘vaccine’ recipients. Dr. Andreas goes on to explain how due to the nanosize of the graphene oxide structures they would not show up in an autopsy as toxicologists can’t imagine that there are structures that can cut up blood vessels causing people to bleed to death on the inside so they would not be looking for them, given their atomic size.”

After speaking out about graphene hydroxide in vaccines on a live stream broadcast, Dr. Noack was arrested on film by German police. On November 26, 2021, Dr. Noack was attacked and murdered. His case remains unsolved.

Conclusion: There is graphene hydroxide in the vaccine, and Dr. Noack was assassinated for speaking the truth.

 

NUREMBERG CODE: Established the principle of free, prior, and informed consent for all medical interventions or experiments.

In a nutshell pic.twitter.com/iyYImbUb03

— Andy D’Alessio2 #WTF 🤷‍♂️ (@andydalessio21) November 23, 2021

His name is Lee Jones, professor of Political Economy and International Relations and author of the 2021 book, Sovereignty and Intervention in Southeast Asia.

Selfishness is okay when it comes to medical interventions.  You have something called the Nuremberg Code, which grew out of the war crimes trials at the end of the Second World War and it established the principle of free, prior, and informed consent for all medical interventions or experiments.  It means that if you’re going to take a medicine or have some kind of procedure or participate in a trial, you must give your free, prior, and informed consent.  You can’t be coerced.  So you’re allowed to be selfish when you decide what goes into your body. That is the principle of bodily autonomy.  So that’s a really important principle I think we have to maintain.  Beyond that, when it comes to the specifics of the COVID vaccine, we have to remember that this [the SARS-CoV-2] is a disease that mostly affects older people.  The younger you are, and if you’re free of co-morbidities—other diseases that make the disease worse—the less benefit that you get from the vaccine anyway.  And there are quite severe, essentially life-threatening side effects.  They’re rare, but so is it rare to die of COVID, for example, if you’re under the age of fifty.  So people may have good reasons to be hesitant.  The other thing to bear in mind, I think is that the vaccines do not prevent you from getting the disease or spreading it.  Public Health England data clearly show that between the vaccination and the vaccinated groups, case rate doesn’t change.  And recent UK study published in the Lancet just last week showed that it’s just as transmissible.  The main benefit that you get is that you don’t have the same disease burden, meaning that you suffer less.  So you’re less likely to suffer a serious disease and be hospitalized.  And obviously if you are in the age range or the health categories where you are vulnerable to the disease, you therefore are strongly encouraged to get the vaccination.  But to my mind, there is no case for coercion, no case for vaccine mandates, and these people should not be losing their jobs just because they want to exercise their right of bodily autonomy.   

Citing the Nuremberg Code makes for a powerful argument, but it doesn't seem to do much to move the federal or state courts to action against the criminal vaccine manufacturers as it applies to the current damages, injuries, and deaths caused by the COVID-19 vaccine rollout.  There are other international agencies that protect informed consent:

It is important to note that the Nuremberg Code is not the only set of ethical guidelines for human experimentation. For example, social media users could have drawn on the more recent Declaration of Helsinki (adopted in 1964, last updated 2013), UNESCO’s Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (2005) or the International Ethical Guidelines for Health-Related Research Involving Humans (fourth version published 2016) to make similar (albeit also incorrect) claims.  

But they, along with the Nuremberg Code, appear to be quite helpless.  Which agency enforces the law?  

Here is a worthwhile podcast: 

Dr. Lee Jones is a Professor of Political Economy & International Relations at the Queen Mary University of London. Dr. Jones and I had a great conversation about China, covid policy, and making the best of Brexit. I've become increasingly concerned that a lot of people in society are unable to move on from the loss of Brexit to find ways to make the best of it--it is not the situation I wanted to be in, I wrote an entire book about it, but I believe there are opportunities to make this work for the British people (though we probably need to ditch the Tories to have any chance of that). It turns out that Dr. Jones has similar views to me on the vaccine passports and he believes that the seemingly strange response to COVID has been building in our society for a long long time.