THE SOLARI REPORT: The Implications of Dr. Judy Wood’s Work with David A. Hughes

Omniwar Is a War against All of Us—Get Out of “Conspiratainment” Mode and Find Ways to Resist

The Implications of Dr. Judy Wood’s Work with David A. Hughes

In 2010, Dr. Judy Wood published her groundbreaking book, Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy… pic.twitter.com/JEBmx9rI1E

— The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts (@solari_the) May 28, 2025

Learn more about Elze van Hamelen @ her blog and at the Solari Report.  

And learn more about David Hughes.  

Where Did the Towers Go?  Evidence of Directed Free Energy Technology on 9/11, Dr. Judy Wood, 2010.

9/11 - Inside Job or Outside Science?

Another great edit by @ThatsLifeButNo2 https://t.co/cX73qHOVlE pic.twitter.com/5es6cJa62v

— 9/11 Revisited (@911Revisionist) May 25, 2025

"Do we want to think about scrambling aircraft, scrambling aircraft?"

Most whistleblowers prefer to keep a very low profile, especially if they have been attempts in their lives like some of the people I have interviewed this of course is quite understandable however certain whistleblowers don't mind stepping Center Stage so to speak and one such man a Former Intelligence Insider born in New Zealand now residing in Scotland has no qualms about going public his name is Dean Warwick. 

00:36.  I was drafted into the New Zealand Army.  I taught every course during my officers Training preparation for Vietnam.  I was taught how to bring down the Twin Towers using nothing but infra-sound.  We were made to study experiments by the Russians, the Americans, and the British in the late 50s.  It was in the mid-60s that I was in the military, but here were these joint maneuvers being undertaken in the late 50s by these three superpowers then in the Eastern block, bringing down 25 story buildings using nothing but sound waves, infrasound.

With Dr. Judy Wood.

2:09.  Well I guess the same theme as last time which was why are we still here why is 9/11 still seen as an unknown even though the truth is known and that's true with a lot of things and how it's managed is how most things are managed last time we start talking about the lens last time we started talking about the Lance Armstrong issue and there's a lot to be said about that and it wasn't that the truth wasn't known or knowable it's that it benefited a lot of people for the truth not to come out there are various folks that put themselves in the gatekeeper position and they make derogatory statements about me and I don't have air time but they do and so everything everyone hears is ray beams from outer space, laser beams in space, space aliens blowing up the towers, and it has nothing to do with what I talk about.  I'm talking about evidence.

3:05.  I think you had the book that the guy that was interviewing you, I can't remember his name, Howard Hughes, 2014, and you were saying that, "Can you show me any part where I said space aliens or anything like that or it's directed energy weapons?

No, I didn't even talk about weapons.  I was just talking about the mechanism of failure was it thermal energy was it kinetic energy or was it something else and you can look at the evidence and the evidence rules out you know first you have to figure out what happened and so you're looking at what happened and the evidence itself has already eliminated kinetic energy.  Kinetic energy is when something flies into something else and hits it you know a gravity collapse would be that boom boom boom the floors would hit each other you look at the seismic chart and that kind of rules out that kinetic energy also a bomb going on the kinetic energy there are chunks that go flying and hit other parts and then thermal energy would mean that the building was cooked to death lots of heat would be involved or you had people walking out of the stairway B and they don't remember being cooked to death and the unburned paper fluttering all about.

4:28.  And the vehicles I think are I remember you saying that there was a police vehicle and it was completely "toast" was the word that you used. 

Yeah, it was toast, it's history.

Toast apart from the plastic thing on the top which has got the lights the light bar on the top which you would have thought if there was heat there then that would have been the first thing to melt.

4:52.  Right, you put that on your grill, you know, it's going to melt.  So you look at things logically even down to that visit by the Pope a couple of years ago where he shuffles into the 9/11 Museum room and there is this Bible artifact that has metal fused to it.  It looks like the metal had been liquid and rolled down the page and resolidified.  It was molten metal but it doesn't mean it was hot; look at the pages they're not burned.

Look at the pages that aren't burned.

Look at the pages aren't burned. 

5:36. There are 7 buildings with the WTC prefix that were destroyed that day.  There were other buildings that were damaged that were destroyed there's that little Greek Orthodox Church if you want to count that one it would be eight.  But there are several others.  There is Bankers Trust and Friedman Hall

DR. JUDY WOOD ON HOW THE WTC TOWERS 1, 2, & 3 CAME DOWN ON 9/11

This is long but good, very good.  Dr. Judy Wood presents evidence of WTCs 1 and 2 being brought down not by jet fuel, not by nano thermite, but by free energy that disrupts the molecules in solid matter, destabilizes them, and turned the towers into dust.  That's why there was so little debris following their dusification.   

If you approach this presentation with intellectual humility, you will see through the government approved counter narrative, to the official government conspiracy theory of what happened on 9/11.

Only true truth seekers, need apply their critical thinking skills.

There are 3… pic.twitter.com/xMOqTKmKRr

— 9/11 Revisited (@911Revisionist) May 12, 2025

If you approach this presentation with intellectual humility, you will see through the government approved counter narrative, to the official government conspiracy theory of what happened on 9/11. Only true truth seekers, need apply their critical thinking skills. There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11 1. Problem solving skills 2. Group Think, peer pressure 3. They just can't handle the implications, terrified by the implications. Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no. Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no. Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no. Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no. The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence. The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence. The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves. Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence. The limitations are mental limitations, they are emotional and psychological limitations to what we allow ourselves to see.

What does it take for you to distrust a "trusted truth teller"?
How much evidence do you need to accept, you've been bamboozled?
This interaction is from 2011... pic.twitter.com/D3u7uxxCfX

— 9/11 Revisited (@911Revisionist) May 7, 2025

1:52.  A quick summary is that the buildings didn't burn up, nor did they slam to the ground, but they turned into dust in mid air.  How do I know that?  Because if they had collapsed to the ground, you would have a pile of debris that would correspond to 2 110-story buildings.  That didn't happen.  Lower Manhattan would have been flooded due to a broken bathtub, the dike that holds out the Hudson River.  Few people realize that the Towers in the Hudson River, the Bedrock is 70 ft below the water table, so there is this dike they call the bathtub or slurry wall that holds out the Hudson River.  If you crash down two 500,000 ton buildings under the bathtub, it would have ruptured and flooded the subway tunnels, the pathway tunnels.  That didn't happen.  As a matter of fact, when they took down the remains of Building 6, they used a cable to pull it down because they were afraid to use explosives and this was a 6-story building there was just this little hump left.  And the other way that I know that it wasn't the buildings turned to dust, it's just a simple way, is that if the buildings had collapsed to the ground, they'd make a thud, and the seismic signal that was recorded did not correspond to the size of the buildings. The seismic signal corresponded to a 16-story building or a 20-story building not 110-story building.

I don't understand the seismographic data.  I haven't studied it.  --Richard Gage, AE911 Truth

I've seen collapses in demolition buildings but nothing like . . . this was unbelievable.  Like I said there wasn't a door, there wasn't anything to be found.  It was all disintegrated, all rubble.  Concrete was in small little pieces, not even slabs.  No desks, no furniture, no computers, no phones, no anything.  So I imagine that the people ended up the same as the buildings . . .  disintegrated, nothing left. 

4:07.  Look at the cover of my book what it shows it's undeniable to anyone who looks at it the building is just frothing up into dust.

4:32.  There's a whole lot of evidence of very weird things that happened at the World Trade Center.  There are about 10,000 filing cabinets that are missing. They're about 20,000 floor trussles and 220 acres of metal decking that is missing.  The question is where did it go?  

Dr. Judy Wood.  

WhereDidTheTowersGo.com.

Finding the Truth, Andrew Johnson.  Free download.

4:55.  We don't know much about weapons that we don't know much about right. 

Wrong.  We know the weapon used on 9/11 was able to do this.  

6:06.  There are no weapons in the public domain which can produce the effects we've just seen.  This includes weapons like thermite, explosives, nukes, fires, hijacked planes, hammers, lasers, cannonballs, and welding torches.  This means it must have been a weapon which is not in the public domain.  

6:20.  The observable evidence shows some kind of non-thermal and non kinetic energy being directed at the WTC to destroy it.

Therefore, the use of a Directed Energy Weapon is not a theory or speculation, it is the most scientifically accurate way of describing the observable evidence.  

6:36.  Why don't you mention any of these large sum of very important empirical evidence from 9/11 on your website or in the presentations?

6:45.  Gage.   We don't have the understanding of what else might be available given that it's not public information.

As you just saw what was physically done to the World Trade Center complex is public information.

7:08.  So what we do at Architects and Engineering 9/11 2 is present in the limited time that we have . . .

AE911 finds the time to make a slick website, print glossy brochures, go on speaking tours, organize billboard campaigns and make documentaries.

But according to Richard Gage, they can't spare one hour to write out a complete list of the evidence for their presentations, brochures, and website.

A summary of the key evidence could be read out to an audience in about 5 minutes, and it could be handed to them on a sheet of paper to read when they get home.

7:35.  The most sought-after scientific, forensic data that we can give you, that you can take to the American people, your friends, neighbors, colleagues, architects, engineers, government officials, media representatives and that they won't think that you are a kook.  This is solid evidence that we present.  Now I'm not going to present every piece of evidence out there that I can't explain. 

[I'm not going to present the hundreds of pieces of evidence out there that conflict with the thermite/ explosive controlled demolition theory.]