DR. ANDY WAKEFIELD: [The CDC] spent the next 14 years destroying the documents, putting them in a dumpster, and covering up and publishing a paper that exonerated the vaccine until one of the whistleblowers, William Thompson, the head scientist in that study, came forward and said, "I can't live with this any longer. I kept the documents. Here they are."

A lot of people smoke but only a few develop lung cancer, but the point is it's patented exposure.  I said look, we believe, for example, the age of exposure is important.  --Dr. Andrew Wakefield

Just look at how much my head is nodding yes as Andy talks......... https://t.co/wfXx8QE63k

— ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆 (@DrJackKruse) February 15, 2025

I think it'll turn out to be the worst mistake they ever made, I really do, because when I got involved, like I said, there were 5 people around the world, a handful of people worldwide prepared to talk about the thorny subject of vaccine safety.  Now, it's more than half the adult population around the world.  Around every dinner table are talking about this issue.  They've made a huge mistake. The other thing that emerged was this, in the context of the MMR vaccine and autism, is that I went to the CDC back in 2000, and they said, "Look Dr. Wakefield, everybody gets the MMR.  Only a few children have autism.  So how do you equate . . . ?" Well that's how medicine works.  A lot of people smoke but only a few develop lung cancer, but the point is it's patented exposure.  I said look, we believe, for example, the age of exposure is important.  We know this because with the natural infection, the younger you get measles the greater the risk of a more severe reaction.  If you get it under age 1, for example, does the same pertain to the vaccine?  If you get the vaccine younger, are you at greater risk?  And they went away to their credit and tested that hypothesis, and they found that it was exactly true.  And they spent the next 14 years destroying the documents, putting them in a dumpster, and covering up and publishing a paper that exonerated the vaccine until one of the whistleblowers, William Thompson, the head scientist in that study, came forward and said, "I can't live with this any longer.  I kept the documents.  Here they are."  It showed fraud, the most appalling violation of medical and scientific ethics on behalf of the CDC.  So people say now "Oh, there's no evidence vaccines cause autism." Absolutely there is.  And when you have to commit to that level of fraud, any level of fraud but that level of fraud, not only in the context of this vaccine but Pfizer in the context of the COVID-19 vaccine and everybody else, you are on a losing run right from the start.  You are going to lose because you can only sustain that lie for so long and then someone somewhere is going to come forward, some brave person, and say, "Actually, no, it was completely the opposite."  And public confidence is shattered.  It will never be regained.  So now we are in a majority of people who are saying no to the fourth, fifth, and sixth booster for COVID-19, and by definition in media terms those are anti-vaxxers; more than half the adult population around the world are anti-vaxxers.  So I think that, as I say, this will turn out to be the greatest mistake they ever made, and I think that we are winning, uncomfortable as that maybe, we are winning.