Never forgive. Never forget. Hold
the Line. Following Nikki Minaj's statement that her cousin's friend grew
impotent following the vaccine, Slate, who pretends to do
investigative journalism, slams MInaj in a hit piece calling her claims
"vaccine misinformation." Tags can work to praise or
condemn. So instead of vetting her claims, Slate goes to treat her
dissenting claims as delusional. Slate writes,
A classic example of vaccine misinformation and how it spreads, Minaj’s post set off a nightlong round of ridicule. Many speculated her cousin’s friend in fact acquired a sexually transmitted infection that derailed his wedding,
calling her conversations with friends and family "rumors," in an effort to effectively dismiss any untoward claims about the vaccines outright before an investigation. Why report on what she says at all? Does one person, one celebrity have that kind of influence over Pfizer's bottom line? Funny how the media doesn't run down other celebrities who helped launch the fear and panic porn of 2020 around COVID. Remember it was Tom Hanks and his dutiful wife who took their marching orders and came out confessing that they too got COVID. Very convenient Too convenient.
So instead of getting health records on her cousin's friend, Slate
accuses the friend of promiscuity, of being a whore, and carrying an STD,
suggesting somehow that the person should be avoided for their opinion because
he is a possible biological vector but for certain a business destroyer.
The truth is that it's not just men but women, too, who have reported swelling,
bleeding, and inflammation from their reproductive organs. Primarily
because the vaccines destroy the pineal gland of the brain, the one
controls the sex hormones and youthful appearances.
But rumors like the one Minaj heard, particularly around men’s sexual health, have made up a common thread of COVID vaccine conspiracies that really do affect vaccine decision-making. And they obscure an actually alarming fact: COVID-19 itself, not the vaccine, can “linger” in the penis and have serious effects on men’s sexual health. I called Dr. Aaron Spitz, a prominent urologist and the author of The Penis Book: A Doctor’s Complete Guide to the Penis, to explain what the current science tells us about what COVID really does to men’s bodies, the fears he’s heard from his patients, and why viruses like this only become real to some men when it concerns their dick. Our conversation has been condensed and edited for clarity.
Ironically, an article that urges men to get the vaccine, simultaneously reveals how sexual impotence is acquired by COVID and its
vaccines to prevent COVID.
Coronavirus infection is already known to damage blood vessels, and vessels that supply blood to the penis appear to be no exception.
Researchers armed with an electron microscope found coronavirus particles in penile tissue samples taken from two former COVID-19 patients who became impotent following their infection, which had occurred six and eight months earlier.
Further study revealed evidence of blood vessel damage in the penises of the COVID-19 patients, compared to two other men with erectile dysfunction who'd never been infected, the researchers reported May 7 in the World Journal of Men's Health.
"We found that the virus affects the blood vessels that supply the penis, causing erectile dysfunction," said senior researcher Dr. Ranjith Ramasamy, director of the reproductive urology program at the University of Miami's Miller School of Medicine. "The blood vessels themselves malfunction and are not able to provide enough blood to enter the penis for an erection."
Finally, someone making sense. We know that the vaccines
cause blood clots, colloquially referred to as "Clot shots." Any
impairment in circulation is going to disrupt function, maybe even cause
permanent damage.
Melatonin is uniquely suited to treat COVID-19 in men,
particularly older men, as well as treat fallout or adverse effects, like
infertility and impotence, from the vaccine. NCBI explains,
As a matter of fact, Covid-19 may be remarkably severe in elderly males, i.e. in a population in which plasma levels of MLT may be particularly low (Touitou et al. 1985).
