Immigration Moratorium Isn’t Enough: Demographic Shift and Mass Deportation Debate https://t.co/6YUENEH6PV pic.twitter.com/nwJGC4wDOa
— Andrew Branca Show (@TheBrancaShow) February 12, 2026
We've been being looted for generations. And we allow it. That's why we're trillions of dollars in debt. It's all been stolen from us, and this is how serious it is. I think this is supposed to be like a sign of hope.
America needs an immigration moratorium.
WOW: "53 percent of households headed by immigrants — naturalized citizens, legal residents, and illegal immigrants — used one or more major welfare programs. This compares to 37 percent for U.S.-born households.
— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) February 10, 2026
The rate is 59 percent for non-citizen households (e.g. green card…
No more immigrants. Zero immigration. I'm all for it. I'm all for it. But even if we do that, this is a horror. Right now we are on track for Heritage Americans to be a minority in our own country by 2046. If we reduce in migration to 0, it buys us an extra 14 years. That's it. That's it. If we reduce immigration to zero, we've bought ourselves 14 more years before we too are a third world nation. That's a horror.
America needs an immigration moratorium.
— White Papers Policy Institute (@WhitePapersPol) February 9, 2026
Brookings Institute found that a "zero immigration" model it would drastically reduce the rate of demographic replacement.
As it is Heritage Americans will be a minority by 2046.
With a moratorium this is pushed passed 2060. pic.twitter.com/Jv0Dyft6DC
The answer of course is that we have to not do zero immigration we have to do negative immigration with a big giant minus sign at the front we have to deport 180 million people out of our country. Every third world migrant, legal and illegal, must go home. That's the only way to save our nation, and thereby save the globe.
Just look at . . . this is the looting again. This is the UK but it's similar in the US.
NET FISCAL CONTRIBUTION BY ETHNIC GROUP
And it's sequenced from left to right: they're Asian, which is Indian. Okay. I can't believe the Asians don't object to that. I'm going to call it Indian. Black / Mixed / Other / . . . . Net negative. Every year. Substantial sums of money. Negative contribution to the UK. The only people making a contribution to the UK are its white population. Everybody else is looting the treasury, and looting white people. And, of course, it's not just money, it's violent, criminal predation.
Arabs in Denmark or anywhere from 3 to 8 times more violent than native Danes. Africans from anywhere are 4 to 9 times more violent than native Danes. Imagine . . . look at Somalia, 10 times more likely to commit violent crime, get convicted of a violent crime. Imagine what they're committing. 10 times more likely to actually get convicted of a violent crime than a native Dane. It's unbelievable it's unbelievable and these are all of course all the countries with the long bars Somalia. You probably can't read them, but I'll read them to you. Somalia, Lebanon, Kuwait, Tunisia, Uganda, Morocco, Algeria, Ethiopia, Afghanistan. Is there a pattern? And then at the bottom, the low violent crime people, a fraction of native Danes: Germany, Norway, Ukraine, Sweden, United Kingdom. I wonder what these have . . . is there any correlation here? Is it possible that you know these blue bars are like white people? Is that possible? And is it possible that these long bars are non-white people? Is it possible that the bottom the low-crime rate are high IQ, high-trust, first world European people? And the people with the tenfold rate of violent predation on innocent people men, women, and children, that these are low IQ, low-trust, poor emotional control, deeply rooted psychological tendencies to violence, genetically coded in their DNA, non-white people?
