The Protection Racket in plain sight.

The Protection Racket in plain sight. https://t.co/08VWvaCFAw

— Kevin McKernan (@Kevin_McKernan) August 12, 2023

"Have you considered the parallels between CBD prohibition and Ivermectin you mocked during the pandemic?"

Have you considered the parallels between CBD prohibition and Ivermectin you mocked during the pandemic?

I bet @joerogan sees the parallel.

IVM won a Nobel prize in medicine.
Was FDA approved
Has a known safety profile
Was cheap
Your CBD karma expired with your IVM hit piece.

— Kevin McKernan (@Kevin_McKernan) August 6, 2023

DR. ELIZABETH EADS: "the combination of Fenbendozale, Ivermectin, and apricot seeds, i.e., B-17 cures cancers. Not all cancers"

Here is Dr. Elizabeth Eads, [5:00-6:00] who has learned from a series of studies out of Europe that the combination of Fenbendozale, Ivermectin, and apricot seeds, i.e., B-17, cures cancers. Not all cancers, she qualifies that point. But there are 63 papers confirming this fact.  She specifies that this combination treats breast cancers, prostate cancers, and colon cancers.  And I like the dig she makes on Obama, passing the bill to unleash government propaganda through HR 4310, the National Defense Authorization Act, signed by Obama on December 29, 2012.  So basically, Section 1078 of that Bill authorizes the use of propaganda inside the U.S.A. which had previously been banned since 1948 when the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act, 1948, was passed.  What does this mean?  [8:00] It means they legalized propaganda, legalizing mainstream media, Big Pharma, hospitals, doctors, and publications to put out campaigns against Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, calling it "Horse Paste."  They weren't allowed to call it Ivermectin.  Who prevented people from calling Ivermectin?  Claiming that Hydroxychlorine was calling heart arrhythmias.  Chlorine Dioxide, they termed it "bleach."  Shout out to Pierre Kory, because the war on Ivermectin is beautifully laid out with all the evidence, and all the studies supporting this propaganda this study from Desort and Henin, The SAIVE Trial is a trial.  "Exposure to that Ivermectin reduced exposure to SARS-CoV-2 by 72%.  Not sure what that means exactly.  I'd be more interested to know what Ivermectin does to the spike proteins from the vaccine.  Hel-lo.  It is telling, however, that all of the Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine papers under the propaganda law were suppressed.  Then how did they get out then?   

12:00  Underlying cause of cancer falls into 3 categories: 1) EMF radiation, radiation, in general; 2) pesticides, glyphosate, benzine, and environmental toxins; 3) parasites.  All of this has been proven in the literature, so you have to attack all three of those causes/categories in order to treat cancer.  She includes the brand Root Spray and Clean Slate.  She also incorporates the blocking of all radiation radiation.and EMF and using products, topical products like Ozone Blocking, EMF-blocking scaler wave stickers.  They block EMF in your phone, your iPad, your cell tower, anything to block the EMF radiation that is bombarding us everyday.

13:35. Lee Merritt recently raised an interesting point going back to when they started to lay the electrical grid and wiryy for the TELEGRAPH. Everywhere where those wires were being laid down, usually along railroad tracks, there was an increased incidence of sickness in people living nearby.  Scientists have been tracking radiation exposure, and EMF exposure, all the way back to the telegraph.  Negative frequencies, whether in music or in warfare, we know that during World War I and World War II, they used negative musical frequency, called The Devil's Tone to injure and make the enemy hyper-aggressive and make them docile and actually surrender.  And then for each pandemic marching through the years, Dr. Lee Merritt lays out a correlation the increased amount of radiation exposure and disease.  So there's a great correlation.  You know, she's from the military, she has a Navy background.  She was an orthopedic spinal surgeon in the Navy and she sat on a lot of these military committees, so she has a lot of data.  But she has correlated the electromagnetic radiation frequency and disease in the human body whether that's acute sickness or illness or cancer she has correlated that and she's out there and she's really outspoken about the importance of Americans decreasing their exposure to EMF radiation and there are great papers on the frequency rate, papers supporting the 5G.  T there is evidence in Wuhan and Lombardi after they turned on those 5G towers is when most of those "Covid" cases occurred. So perhaps it was just a high amount of 5G exposure causing illness and sickness and toxicity in the body that killed a lot of those patients and not necessarily the bioweapon that was also distributed to people In Lombardi and Wuhan and New York City.

16:36. In your February interview you said something that some people thought was outrageous but you don't lie.  For example,  this explosion in cancers, you got the goods on to tell us there's also a video out by Dr. Bischoff. [Taking vitamin D3, Omega 3s, and exercise may reduce invasive cancers by 61% in adults 70 years old and up.] You can see him give his dissertation from cancer.org the Cancer Society Prevention Society.

17:00  At least a billion dead or disabled by Covid-19 bioweapon vaccine.  Are you sticking by that, or do you have more to back that up?

17:10  I am sticking by that.  Actually, it's going to be higher than that, 1.2 billion.  A paper recently came out submitted by Dave Hodges shows 600,000 Americans per year are dying from Covid shots.  And that data is supported by Stirling and Ed Dowd.  What they did is look at the actuary numbers in the insurance, life insurance numbers, because you know, because we don't have good data sets from the hospitals because they're not reporting vaccine injuries; they're not reporting vaccine status; they're not correlating the deaths with mRNA vaccines.  They're doing that on purpose.  

18:05  You're saying that the data they're getting of 600,000, that's just low because the hospital is shading that.  

18:16  I am sure it's slightly hire because we don't have the data set from the hospitals.  When we're talking about 600,000 excess deaths/year [Josh Stirling, an insurance analyst presents this number at the 6:49 mark] and we're not done with 2023 yet, that could potentially be 1.2 billion.  

18:34  A year?

18:35  Correct.  

18:40  That seems like a lot, right?  That's 1.2 billion globally.  There are 13 billion injections at least.  That's the number. These are the CDC numbers.  And there are at least 676 million injections alone.  676 million injections, CV19 bioweapon injections, in America alone.

19:05  So the UK has really good data set from their Dept. of Health and they have projected recently in a UK study that they've had 5, they're on their 5th or 6th booster.  They're projecting a population decrease by 2025 of 77%.  

20:35  Ed Dowd says that the number of injured is exponentially higher than those who are dying.  What do you think about the disabilities and deaths in the U.S. for 2023?  Ed Dowd said we lost 30% of our workforce in 2022.

20:54  It's going to be in the high millions. 600,000 and we're not done with 2023.  You double that and that's what, 1.2 million and that's underreported.  So millions.  Remember that the spike protein and the bioweapon nanotechnology remain in the body for we don't know how long.  There's no endpoint.  The reason you're getting these super cancers is because you have spike proteins being manufactured with no off button.  And so you have a delayed effect in auto-immune disorders and cancers.  What happens is that the spike protein dysregulates your T-cells, your B-cells which fight foreign bacteria, viruses, and cancers, and the complement system.  It interrupts that.  And then you have the SV40 that was discovered in the Moderna and Pfizer vials by Kevin McKernen who worked on the human genome project, who is a microbiologist.  So you have these foreign proteins with DNA, this monkey SV40 which he discovered in over the legal amount allowed to be as a contaminant in the vials, and multiple vials he looked at.  So you had these DNA proteins getting into the cells and introducing this monkey DNA, the SV40, which is also dysregulating your normal T-cells, normal B-cells, and complement which normally attack and eat cancer.  They're actually causing cancers.  And it's been suggested that these SV40 lead to cancers such as mesothelioma, lymphoma, and brain cancer.  And there's a direct correlation.  So there's no endpoint to the mRNA mechanism, the nanotechnology that has clearly been proven by the patents which are on Karen Kingston's substack.  And there's no turn-off switch for the spike protein.  The spike protein remains in the body for 1-3 years that we've seen so far. 

23:54  It doesn't dissipate?

23:55  No, that's my point.  

24:00  Is this why people are prescribing Ivermectin is it because it binds, this is what Dr. Pierre Kory told me, is it because it binds to the spike proteins and removes them?  Dr. Peter McCullough is also prescribing Nattokinase because it dissolves the spike protein.  Bind, remove, dissolves, sound like a pretty good one-two punch.  Are those two great things to have if you're going to preemptively attack spike proteins if you've been vaxx'd or if you're being shed on?

24:40  Absolutely.  Look, Nattokinase has been used as a food supplement in Japan for years.  And the life expectancy in Japan is really long, it's over 100 years old.  Nattokinase boosts the immune system.  It makes the red blood cells in your blood, whether it's venous or arterial, it doesn't matter.  It makes them less sticky, and it decreases the incidents of blood clots.  But also it's been shown by Peter McCullough and his team, to sweep out the spike protein, so I highly recommend the use of Nattokinase, Ivermectin, and some kind of chelation.  I love the Root Spray and Clean Slate.  Ivermectin has been proven to decrease the effects of spike protein.  Decrease the effects of and limit viral exposure and the entrance of the virus into cells and block the mechanism of the virus sticking to the ACE2 Receptors and the spike protein sticking to the ACE2 receptors, which are all over all the organs in the body.  So I use a combination of products.  I also use dimethylglycine or methylene Blue to turn off the mRNA.  It demethylates the mRNA that is outside the cell.  There's no product that we know that stops the mRNA mechanism inside the cell at this point.  But I use that whole combination to lessen the effect of the spike protein.  

26:55  No treatment that we know of for the q dot nanoparticles that Karen Kingston describes.  

27:05  That's not shed on you, that's actually injected into the 200 plus million Americans . . . that is not a shedding issue.  That's an issue of injection, correct?

27:17  No.  Actually, the nanoparticles can be shed during transmission as well and they can jump from person to person.  And that's been seen in the DoD literature and supported by James Giordano, who is Advisor to U.S. Military Intelligence community.  In fact, he wrote that "neurotism technologies and neurotechnology nanoparticles, such as NeuroLink, Neurolace should not be considered for their mass destruction effects."

27:57  What would Elon Musk say about that? It's a bio weapon, right? These are all bio weapons, right?

28:05. These are definitely bioweapons.  If you go to Karen Kingston's substack, she has put out . . . she has done some great work in Florida.  She has put out 12 Points.  She set up a document that has laid out 12 talking points to send to your County Commissioner to get rid of these mRNA shots.  And in Point #12, I am going to read it, it says biological weapons are weapons of mass destruction.  Allowing their use on civilian populations is a 1st-degree felony in the state of Florida.  And she goes on to say that mRNA vaccines contain neurotechnology that is patented for use as a bioweapon.  She has the receipts on her website.  And this document can be downloaded off of her substack and used for any county in any state.  This is specific to Florida, but she has a letter on there where you can plug in your County Commissioner's name and office.  In the letter, you can tailor that letter to your own county commissioner in any state.  I actually sent it to my county commissioner here in Florida.  

29:40  Are they going to do anything about it? 

29:42  Yes, Collier County has passed legislation that protects its citizens against mandates, and these mRNA vaccines.  It also talks about informed consent and there are other counties in Florida that are going to pass legislation against these mRNA technologies., mandates, and against the lack of informed consent.  It's a beautifully written document and everybody should download that.

30:25  Karen Kingston was on the cutting edge of this from the very beginning.  

If you want to get Ivermectin without a prescription,

there are places in the United States.  See here.  If you order from outside the U.S., say, from India, it will take at least 1 full month before you receive it in your mail.  

$70 for 90 Count.  Well, it was $70.  Today, Sunday, May 19, 2024, it's $90 for 90-count.  

FenLAB Phenbendazol 220 | mg | >99% | 90 | ct https://t.co/eg4yYaGn12 via @amazon

— St. Michael, the Archangel (@aveng_angel) May 20, 2024

"Get Ivermectin" they say. Okay, but where?

Someone recommended this pharmacy to order Ivermectin.  But it's in India, and so it will take a full month before you receive it.  

Here are their contact numbers.  

And here is their website. 

There are other places in the U.S. where you can get Ivermectin. 

1.  PharmacyOnAir.  I've not ordered from this place, but it is in the United States, so the benefit there is that it won't, or it shouldn't, take a month to get your product say if you were ordering from overseas.  And here, someone [from the company] was thoughtful enough to add a review of the site. 

Well, it looks like I didn't search this thoroughly.  This company is also located in India, Mumbai, India.  Because their phone number is a 310 prefix, I thought that they were located in West Los Angeles.  They're not.  First, their phone number is 310-491-0704, IST, or Indian Standard Time.  So at 2:50pm PST in Los Angeles is 3:20am IST in India.  HOURS: Mon-Fri, 9-8; Sat, 9-5. Closed Sundays. 

2.  BuyIvermectinForHumans.  I am reposting that URL because it has us. suffix.  https://buyivermectinforhumans.us/. 

For this company, no phone number is offered, no physical address posted, only an email form for contact.  I guess these places don't know how to do business.  So I sent an email on Friday, June 9, 2023.  

3.  ReliableRxPharmacy.  This company is located in India, which means that it will take a minimum of 3 weeks, more commonly 4 weeks, to arrive to your mail in the U.S.  Also, their payment system does not accept your credit cards.  They have 2 forms of payment: Bitcoin and eCheck. 

Two products: Imrotab 6mg, and Ivetab, 12mgs.  Ivetab here for $57.50.

However, if you want to get tested for different kinds of parasites, this site, Parasite Testing, is a reliable source.  

4.  Ravkoo Pharmacy.  Well, another case REFUSING TO INFORM customers WHERE they are located.  Their "CONTACT US" page is an email form page.  NO physical address.  However, they do have a phone number listed:  863-875-5700.  Could be Florida. 

5.  EarlyTreatmentMeds. HOURS: 8:30-5:00pm, EASTERN STANDARD TIME, M-F. 800-889-9638.  If you're you're on the west coast, call before or by 1:30pm.  These guys are located in  Wilmington, Delaware.  Yikes.  Their address is  Corporate Creations Network, Inc.  3411 Silverside Road Tatnall Building, Suite 104, Wilmington, Delaware, 19810.

6.  Ivermectin.  Call 1-888-559-2247.  Located at 701 South Carson Street, Suite 200, Carson City, Nevada, 89701.  This is not a good sign.  I got this page, and message, by clicking on "Order" and "Dosage" from the bottom red banner.  I did not find the "Reviews" helpful at all.  Nothing specific there.

 

Having tweeting troubles.
Medicine Counter Hixson, TN 423.680.7373
TN law ok to sell IVM OTC.

— Twyla Honey (@TwylaHoney) August 15, 2023

Medicine Counter Pharmacy. 

MEDICINE COUNTER

5506 Highway 153 Ste 102 102 Ste

Hixson, TN 37343

(423) 680-7373

Mon-Friday 9am-7pm, Saturday 10-2pm, 

Order thru their website, GoMedicineCounter.com. 

 

"Nobody's talking, because they don't want to talk about Hydroxychloroquine. They don't want to be political because their show is sponsored by pharmaceutical companies"

Yes, I cannot advertise for any clinical trial on Fb or Instagram... I am Banned... Before Covid, I could advertise for any trial on any of my pages... Interference with research affects everyone. Who is directing this 💩show that has all of us censored at every level?
The real… https://t.co/M7iu3qTC65

— sabine hazan md (@SabinehazanMD) April 21, 2023

She mentions LA Clinical Trials and Ventura Clinical Trials early in the interview.  And she mentions IRB, which is Institutional Review Board.

Protocols are 300 pages.

HOW IVERMECTIN WORKS AGAINST SARS-COV-2: ivermectin comes along and stops any further transfection and tags the already transfected cells for removal by the immune system....

IVERMECTIN INHIBITS NUCLEAR IMPORT!!! IT STOPS mRNA FROM GETTING INTO THE CELL!!! 

God how did I miss the nuclear import thing.... It'd stop you from being further permanently transfected by anyone you come in contact with who's had a recent booster and it should potentially even fix the apoptosis problem and clear out the transfected cells....

— Hippopotamus Rising (@HippopotamusRi1) December 3, 2022

Fuhhhkkkkk. We win. It explains why it reverses paralysis, parkinsonsesque/psychosisesque/schizophrenicesque adverse reactions

— Hippopotamus Rising (@HippopotamusRi1) December 3, 2022

Spike is being produced constantly in the brain/spinal cord and then causing constant exponentially increasing inflammation and then ivermectin comes along and stops any further transfection and tags the already transfected cells for removal by the immune system....

— Hippopotamus Rising (@HippopotamusRi1) December 3, 2022

Frickkkkkkk!!!! That's part of why Fulvic works that I hadn't realized!!!
It also binds the spike and would flag transfected cells for removal!
Not nearly as strong of a binding but there's no reason to think it wouldn't have a similar impact

— Hippopotamus Rising (@HippopotamusRi1) December 3, 2022

https://t.co/uaMWXwYKKX

— Hippopotamus Rising (@HippopotamusRi1) December 3, 2022

NoFluxGiven writes, 

I believe Dr Paul Marik and Dr Been agree, and one of the reasons IVM is the foundation of the I-RECOVER protocols by the http://flccc.net. 

Combined with fasting, red light therapy, and Methylene Blue to effectively stop replication and degrade the spike. Nailed it! 

https://t.co/cjh39iAzKZ

— Мария Иванова (@MariIva09434672) December 3, 2022

HOW TO GET IVERMECTIN:  If you're wondering how to obtain Ivermectin, one responder wrote

7 dollars...duramectin...farm and fleet type stores...horse on package..one click per 50 pounds..no problem..you're welcome...

— MamaDL (@dl_mama) December 3, 2022

Here is one farm & fleet store.   

Remdesivir increases the risk of death by 3%, the chances of renal failure by 20%, and costs $3,000/course. Ivermectin reduces the risk of death by 50% and costs the W.H.O. two cents

It should be clear by now that when you put your trust in doctors using hospital care, those doctors are not using their best tested, studied options or practice.  No.  Unfortunately, they're merely following the orders from on high, even from international bodies, far removed from local knowledge, local, standard, and tested care.  So when you think you are under the care of an expert, ah, your doctor is only an expert at following the orders of outside agencies.   

Remdesivir is bad. Fauci was so thrilled to push it. pic.twitter.com/8WWh7AKtpH

— Broken Truth 🐭 (@BrokenTruthTV) November 1, 2022

If you look at the 4 independent studies, including the large studies by the W.H.O. it shows the opposite effect.  Remdesivir increases the risk of death.  Let me say that again.  Remdesivir increase the risk of death by 3%.  It increases your chances of renal failure by 20%.  This is a toxic drug.  But just to make the situation even more preposterous, the federal government will give hospitals a 20% bonus on the entire hospital bill if they prescribe Remdesivir to Medicare patients.  [Oh, so the federal government is trying to kill elderly patients.  Huh.]  The federal government is incentivizing hospitals to prescribe a medication which is toxic.  So it should be noted that Remdesivir costs about $3,000 a course.  Dr. Kory spoke about Ivermectin.  Ivermectin reduces the risk of death by about 50%.  It costs the W.H.O. $0.02.  Two cents.  So as regards Dexamethazone,  This is the wrong drug in the wrong dose for the wrong duration of time yet every clinician in this country will absurdly use this homeopathic dose of Dexamethazone.  Why?  Because the NIH tells them to do this.  So what the NIH and other agencies have ignored are multiple FDA-approved drugs.  These are FDA-approved drugs.  These are not experimental drugs, which are cost-effective, and safe, and have unequivocally, unequivocally been shown to reduce the death of patients in the ICU and in hospital . . . .

"And you know what, the average hospital bill is about $400,000 to $500,000 per COVID patient. Hospitals get 20% bonus on the entire hospital bill"

The speakers are Dr. Paul Marik [more here] and Steve Kirsch.

And you know what, the average hospital bill is about $400,000 to $500,000 per COVID patient.  Hospitals get 20% bonus on the entire hospital bill. 

5:30  If you don't go along with their protocol, you'll be terminated, and they'll find anyway to terminate you.  And we should know, that there are probably financially incentives.  If you're diagnosed with COVID, you get a bonus.  If you're intubated, you get a bonus.  If you prescribe this ridiculous drug, Remdesivir, which increases your risk of death, you get a 20% bonus.  So there are enormous financial incentives for them

. . . just for prescribing a drug?

5:55  Yes, for prescribing Remdesivir, you get a 20% bonus on the entire hospital bill.

Who's paying that, the U.S. government?  Yes, so these are Medicare patients.  If you're a Medicare patient, you get a 20% bonus . . . 

On the entire bill?

On the entire hospital bill . . . .  And you know what, the average hospital bill is about $400,000 to $500,000 per COVID patient.  

6:27  Wow, so we're talking a significant incentive for the hospital to say "follow the protocols."

6:35  Yes, there's a lot of small chain involved.  And that's why they don't like troublemakers who are going to interfere with their bottom line.  I mean the patient outcome, whether the patient lives or dies, is completely irrelevant.  It's all about the bottom line and profiteering and making money.  

7:02  So, a lot of people think that we should be incentivizing hospitals to save lives and that hospitals should get $100,000 if they saved a COVID life.  If someone checked in and is suffering respiratory distress, and the hospital is able to save that patient, they should get like a $30,000 bonus.  They should incentivize the outcomes that you want, right?  

Boy, is that a telling remark! 

7:26  Yes, so it's upside down.  You actually get incentivized if patients die, which is completely opposite of the traditional Chinese Medicine.  In fact, if patients did badly, these practitioners weren't paid.  They weren't incentivized if they patient did badly.  We actually have a system where the hospital actually profits when a patients gets intubated, going on a ventilator, and dying. 

7:52  So, what woke you up, what made you realize that the vaccine that you were asked to take and that you willingly took, what caused you to shift from being a believer in the safety of the vaccine, of the COVID vaccine, to now speaking out against the COVID vaccine?  What was the moment that did that, or did that happen over time?

8:14  Yeah, so when the vaccines came out, I was vaccinated in December 2020.  Firstly, I had no option, because I would have been terminated.  Secondly, at that time, I believed the narrative.  What can I say?  I am like most doctors who've been brainwashed and indoctrinated, so I did believe the narrative.  And then with time, it took time, Pierre figured this out much quicker than me.  I was still a little bit on the fence, but with time it became clear.  First, we had no idea what's in these vials.  We have no idea what's happening.  They were inadequately tested and they lied to us, and it became clearer with time that this was one big massive lie, that they were neither safe, nor effective.  And as more and more data came out, and we saw from the VAERS data and multiple databases that they had lied to us and then it became clear.   

9:20  So was it the accumulation of data that you were observing and instead of just reading the conclusions of the paper, you were looking at the underlying data.  And were you seeing that first 

14:05. Like, can you practice medicine today?  Did they take away your licenses, or what did they take away from you?  

14:10. Yes, so you know, this all happened independently, Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Brian Tyson, Dr. Ryan Cole, Dr. Urso, it's not like we conspired together.  We just independently came to the same conclusion.  If you look at the data, there's no other conclusion to see.  My end result was basically the hospital [Sentara Norfolk General Hospital in Norfolk, Virginia] terminated my career for good. 

14:40. You can't go to any other hospital because you're essentially blacklisted at this hospital which means you can't get into any other hospital?  

14:47. Yeah, so they reported me to the National Practitioner Data Bank, and once you get into the data bank as a devious, deviant, bad-actor doctor, it's almost impossible to get out of it.  Also, they reported me to the Board, and then the Board of Medicine came up with their own concocted charges against me.  So, this is the problem if you try to speak out, try and speak the truth.  The Board of Medicine accused me of prescribing Ivermectin to a bunch of patients who were injured.  The truth of it is I've actually been able to prescribe Ivermectin.  Ever.  And the patients they claimed I treated are non-existent patients, so that tells you how far the virginia Board of Medicine will go to accuse me of prescribing Ivermectin to non-existent patients.  I mean I never wrote a scripp for anyone.  

15:50. So how did those non-existent patients actually do?  Did they show you the medical records of those patients?  

15:58. No, no what they do is the same thing as sham peer review.  They accuse you of a crime but they don't give you the evidence.  So in my sham peer review they accused me of 7 outrageous charges but they were unable to provide any evidence, any evidence actually to support the charges that they made.  One of the charges was that I forced a nurse to give a patient a medication to which the patient was allergic.  Now, I mean can you imagine something that outrageous?  They were unable to provide any evidence that I'd actually done such a thing but I was assumed guilty as charged and I had no legal representation, and based on these bogus charges they withdrew my hospital privileges.

16:48. Is there a public record of this so that the public can get this record and look at the name of the patient . . . and maybe it's redacted.  Is there a way that this can be verified independently by a 3rd party or is it all done behind closed doors?  

17:07. So, if it's done behind closed doors, i was never given the name of the patient.  So believe it or not, I was accused of this crime but the name of the patient was never disclosed to me, nor was I given any information regarding the patient.  And it's meant to be privileged and confidential but obviously I am not going to hide it because it's an outrage, it's immoral, it's evil.  So, no, I have written a little story about this because it's an outrage.  I have shared this story with a number of representatives in the Virginia Legislature who know about this.  And Robert Malone knows about it too.  He's actually . . . he's doing a book and in his book he's going to cover this whole nasty episode.  But this thing, it's not unknown.  I was ignorant and never knew about it, but if you actually look unto it there's this thing called sham peer review, it's well-known.  And it's what hospitals do to get rid of doctors they consider to be troublemakers.  

18:17. So there's no public record, no record at all of who your charges, who your patients were supposedly?  And why did they not reveal to you the name of the patient who you prescribed the ivermectin to because that's your patient. There's no confidentiality there, so why would they not want to reveal that name to you?  

18:40. That was the Board.  The Board of Medicine 

EARLY TREATMENT, EARLY TREATMENT. FDA BLOCKED EARLY TREATMENT

By Dr. Meryl Nass

South Africa acted to prevent its citizens from accessing ivermectin for COVID on Christmas Eve, 2020. This was ten days after Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccines rolled out in the US. Was it a coincidence?

South Africa’s government did this by directly banning the drug’s importation in the midst of a serious COVID wave. The government was taken to court, and after a few months, the people won, and the drug returned to the shelves.

In the US, starting in early 2021, a variety of methods were used to stop use of ivermectin for COVID, but all of them were indirect and covert. There was no clear action one could bring to a court. Instead, roadblocks were placed in the way of importing the drug, but importation was not banned outright. FDA claimed ivermectin was a “horse dewormer” in tweets and its website—and the tweeter was congratulated by the acting FDA Commissioner, FDA’s top official. But FDA never issued an official warning regarding safety, did not add a warning to the label, never recalled a single lot nor took ivermectin off the market.

I detailed the many methods that were used to stop doctors prescribing the drug in an earlier substack article. The point I want to make here is that none of the strategies that were used to choke off its use employed the normal, legal mechanisms for taking a dangerous drug off the market. Instead, hidden hands used underhanded methods in order to wrest control of medical care away from the doctor and patient. In place of patient autonomy, a single COVID protocol was imposed on all Americans. A protocol crafted opaquely by one of Tony Fauci’s handpicked, Pharma-conflicted teams of experts.

Americans pay, on average, $13,000 per person per year for healthcare. We have just lost the right to direct how that money is spent. It is critically important for the country to understand this. We are experiencing a hostile takeover of the $4.1 trillion dollar US healthcare industry under the guise of COVID. Will we stand for it? We must quickly grasp that the right to choose our own healthcare was just usurped by a mafia fronted by people in white coats who pose as medical experts.

Ivermectin is today’s example. What will it be tomorrow? How much is choosing your own healthcare worth to you?

Below is my prescient article from 14 months ago.  

Continue reading . . . 

"It would undermine the indiscriminate vaccine, vaccination policy for every single human being, including extremely low-risk people"

Vaccines the Question Nobody Wants to Answer https://t.co/uGaj7mhoTe

— Mike Walgenbach (@mwalgen44) January 27, 2022

Fauci is an out-and-out criminal.  Check this out,

Fauci has been desperate to even confiscate Ivermectin shipment into the USA because his only solution is not treatment, but vaccination. Ivermectin is being used outside the USA and the studies are positive. Numerous doctors have been calling for real studies on this drug. New research out of Israel has found that administering the anti-parasite drug ivermectin to COVID19 patients may help to drastically reduce the duration of infections – and all for less than $1 a day.  

My personal skepticism derives not from vaccines, I had my children vaccinated. My concern is (1) I know that Klaus Schwab told people a virus was coming in advance, and I was given the very code used to justify lockdowns and the computer program was a joke. Bill Gates-funded that code. In fact, not a single program funded by Bill Gates which made these dire forecasts was ever correct. Once governments were BRIBED by lobbyists to mandate vaccines around the world, and the media has joined in along with people like Howard Stern and Neil Young, I cannot see where any rational person would trust Big Pharma or government. Now that the politicians got involved, they are putting everyone’s life at risk because politicians will NEVER admit they EVER made a mistake.

NEW HAMPSHIRE PHARMACIES: Could soon dispense Ivermectin without doctor approval

Victory for health freedom RT New Hampshire pharmacies could soon dispense ivermectin without doctor approval    https://t.co/cUnAJbEZoq

— The HighWire (@HighWireTalk) January 25, 2022

DR. PAUL MARIK: REMDESIVIR INCREASES THE RISK OF DEATH

AZT 2.0. https://t.co/TXYJbQtWuD

— James Lindsay, watching narratives crumble (@ConceptualJames) January 24, 2022

LIPOSOMAL FORM OF NUTRITIENTS WERE LESS CYTOXIC THAN IVERMECTIN & SHOWED SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN ANTI-VIRAL ACTIVITY

It's not that they don't know, it's that they just won't say.

>>The engineered liposomes were less cytotoxic than ivermectin alone and they showed a significant increase of the antiviral activity in all the Dengue stains tested (1, 2, and S221). <<    https://t.co/r3Wugl6NZe

— DCGreenZone (@DCGreenZone1) January 14, 2022

"Along with ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, Rodgers was treated for COVID-19 with monoclonal antibodies, zinc, and vitamins C and D."

Not completely sure how the marketing of Ivermectin works against the vaccine campaign, but clearly if Ivermectin's reputation survives as a cure for the SARS-CoV-2 virus and or COVID, wouldn't that throw into question the origin story of SARS-CoV-2 or COVID from being a virus that originated in some exotic wet market out of China to that of a parasitic worm contracted from some unclean source?  If Ivermectin is a horse dewormer or a dewormer of any kind and it works to cure COVID 100%, wouldn't that make the cause of COVID not a virus but a parasite?  When they claim dewormer, they're conceding that the cause of COVID is a parasitic worm. 

The tweet below comes from World Net Daily covering Aaron Rodgers's recent interview with Pat McAfee.  Author Art Moore explains that 

Along with Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, Rodgers was treated for COVID-19 with monoclonal antibodies, zinc, and vitamins C and D. The Packers star told McAfee the treatment was recommended by podcaster and friend Joe Rogan, who recovered quickly from his own bout with COVID-19.

"I'm not some uneducated person who's throwing stuff out there," Rodgers said. "If you want to rip on me because I took horse dewormer, and whatever else you want to talk about, that's fine. But I also got better in 48 hours. And I had symptoms." 

Back in October 2021, Dr. Judy Mikovits called the vaccines a synthetic virus. More recently, we've learned that it is a synthesis if virus and parasite.  What an awful combination.  

.My house's dewormer? Yep....that and Hydroxychloriquine (fish tank cleaner) But WAIT.....Who recommended people swallow flashlights & ingest bleach; THEN start a program and dubbed it "Operation Warp Speed"? Hint: NOT DR. FAUCI. pic.twitter.com/GmT13H6hym

— Doxiemama16 🇺🇸🇮🇹🇬🇧 🏴‍☠️ (@taraclocastro) December 6, 2021

BIG IVM WIN: A Virginia judge ruled Fauquier Medical must allow ivermectin or be fined $10,000/day since 12/9.

Attorney Ralph Lorigo has won almost all of his MANY cases suing to get IVM to dying patients. Every time the hospital refuses, delays or appeals. Now its THEIR turn to pay… instead of the patient. One hospital will owe 50K if IVM not given by 9pm. Gee, I wonder what they’ll do? https://t.co/IgAZlu8bsP

— Pierre Kory, MD MPA (@PierreKory) December 13, 2021

U.S outperformed the U.K and Australia in controlling summer Delta Surge with the use of IVM... this despite CDC/FDA unleashing #pharmageddon

Article shows the U.S outperformed the U.K and Australia in controlling summer Delta Surge with the use of IVM... this despite CDC/FDA unleashing #pharmageddon on IVM in August.. U.S doc's held fast, stuck to their guns, and are ending the surge. Go Docs!  https://t.co/SHWRFxAD3M

— Pierre Kory, MD MPA (@, PierreKory) October 23, 2021

The Story Of Ivermectin And COVID-19

NCBI explains that 

Ivermectin proved to be even more of a ‘Wonder drug’ in human health, improving the nutrition, general health and wellbeing of billions of people worldwide ever since it was first used to treat Onchocerciasis in humans in 1988.

The narrator explains that Ivermectin, discovered in the 1970s, treats river blindness caused by a parasitic worm and caused untold suffering and even death in Central and Southern America and much of Africa. 

Instead of Ivermectin, Fauci endorsed Remdesivir, which has a lousy effect on mortality.  In fact, in the study that initially began to examine mortality, Fauci switched the results or endpoint of the study from Remdesivir’s impact on mortality to Remdesivir’s impact on “time it takes to recover.”

So why would Dr. Fauci and NIH continue to endorse a drug that costs $3,100 per course of treatment [unlike Ivermectin, which is narrowly free] and that has shown to have no impact on mortality?  Who makes Remdesivir and how are they related to who gets to decide which drugs can be used to treat COVID-19? 

Remdesivir is made by Gilead Sciences, a pharmaceutical company located in Foster City, CA.  From 1997-2001, the chairman of Gilead was Donald Rumsfeld, one of the architects of the War in Iraq.  

When Ford lost the 1976 election, Rumsfeld returned to private business and financial life, and was named president and CEO of the pharmaceutical corporation G. D. Searle & Company. He was later named CEO of General Instrument from 1990 to 1993 and chairman of Gilead Sciences from 1997 to 2001.

During the same period, one of the board members of Gilead was George Schultz, a long-time Bush Family ally who was instrumental in convincing George W. Bush to run for the United States.  

In order to understand why the NIH treatment panel is so pro-Remdesivir, it’s essential to understand the financial ties between Gilead Sciences and members of that treatment panel.  Looking at the treatment panel’s financial disclosures, you will see that no fewer than 7 members disclosed financial support from Gilead Sciences.  Interestingly, the 3 co-chairs who select the other members of the panel, do not disclose support from Gilead.  However, two of the Chairs, Roy Gulick and Henry Masur, both receive financial support from Gilead.  Even more interestingly, the third co-chair, Clifford Lane was actually was one of the authors of the NIAID study on Remdesivir, but you won’t see his name in the list of the article’s authors.  You have to look at the financial disclosure form that accompanied that article.  

It’s also worth noting that 7 out of 12 of these co-authors on that study disclosed funding from Gilead Sciences.  The significance of this cannot be overstated.  Two of the three chairs of the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Panel, the people who put the panel together, received financial support from Gilead Sciences, while the other was intimately involved in the study that attempted to and failed to prove that Remdesivir was an effective treatment of COVID-19.  

Given these professional and financial ties, is there any way that we could reasonably expect them to impartially judge the best treatments for COVID-19?  Or choose panel members who advocate for repurposing cheap, off-patent drugs that would completely undercut the market for one of the main products of a company with which they enjoy close financial and professional ties? 

This seems like good news.

Curious what Ivermectin skeptics have to say about these results.

Thanks to Ryan Dawson.  https://t.co/QvGIEbwq1S

— Stephen W. Carson (@RadicalLib) September 5, 2021

A strong immune system is your best mask. Vitamin D delivers that strong immunity. Fauci takes 8,000 to 9,000 IUs of vitamin D3

Thanks to Robert Wenzel.

This presentation is a full hour.  This YouTube version is only 29 minutes long.  To watch the full presentation, please open this Rumble link.  The presenter is pathologist and MD, Dr. Ryan Cole.  His credentials are here: 

Dr. Cole is a board-certified dermatopathologist (AP & CP) and the CEO/Medical Director of Cole Diagnostics. He has worked as an independent pathologist since 2004. Some highlights from his CV: Ackerman Academy of Dermatopathology (July 2002-June 2003): Dermatopathology Fellowship (Chief Fellow). Mayo Clinic (July 1997-June 2002): Resident in Anatomic and Clinical Pathology. Chief Fellow, Surgical Pathology Fellowship. Medical College of Virginia (1993-1997): Researched immunology. Served as President of Student Family Practice organization. Coordinated activities and seminars on the practice of family medicine and rural medicine. Earned MD in 1997.

Fauci takes 8,000 to 9,000 IUs of vitamin D3.  But what's his message?  Wear a mask, maybe two.  Why isn't his message to take 10,000IU of vitamin D?

Dr. Cole praises the effectiveness of Ivermectin, calling it an immune modulator and anti-viral medication.  And if anyone has had any one of the vaccines and experiences a cytokine storm, he says that Ivermectin may be your best choice for quelling that storm.  That, and vitamin D.