The language of medicine is the language of the gulag

"There's this thing in vaccination particularly with children, that there is a term that's actually used by the CDC that's called Capture. It's literally a term it's called capture. That when that child is in front of you if they are behind on doses of vaccine that you've got an… https://t.co/QA5izWuVmz pic.twitter.com/cQBXZwzNzj

— DrRay (@DrNoMask) September 3, 2024

It is amazing how young couples when first starting out in their respective careers, that one of the perks they love to brag about is the benefit package from their company.  "Oh, we've got 100% coverage.  No deductibles."  I mean this is more important than the salaries in a lot of cases.  And I get it.  Most young people go without insurance with the exception maybe of emergency care, and they're so glad that they finally get to be tested for that minor but aching and nagging problem they had in their foot.  So they go to the doctor, they get tested, the doctor recommends procedures, and the young person doesn't know how to negotiate their own healthcare.  They learn of course, but at what cost?  

What people do learn is that the industry does not have your best health in mind.  Ever.  Hospitals are like abattoirs, where the very young and very old go to die.  Yet, parents will take their very young and their very old parents to the hospital . . . to die.  As an industry, we've not come very far from the 19th and 18th century gruesome experiments.  Part of that has to do with censorship.  One example is the germ versus the terrain theory.  All of modern medicine operates on the germ theory, that viruses are contagious.  

But what about vaccination history, from flu shots to polio shots to tetanus shots.  How could it be that we view remnants of a dead virus as some kind of mystical miracle of healing?  Easy, treat all of medicine as mystical and incomprehensible.  What we get in our benefits package is an invitation to a witch doctor, oh, witch doctors with tons of confidence because of the low liability on their part that comes with the monetary rewards from the same companies, the insurance companies.  We are living under a 3rd Reich of medicine.

Doctors rely on what scientists play with or discover or don't discover and then cover it with some kind of crazy theory.  And doctors follow whatever scientists advance.  In 1911, scientists tried proving the contagion theory of viruses by injecting the blood of a diseased monkey into healthy monkeys.  But the monkey would not develop the same disease.  Yes, they'd develop a fever and inflammation, which is an immune response to a foreign protein, but they would not develop the disease.  Yet we've been made to believe for decades if not centuries that if we're around someone with a cold we too will get that cold.  But immune systems are different, some are stronger than others.  This is why a medical card should be shown to people important to you.

6/16
So far, the expeiment is a failure, but they blame either the rhesus monkey not being a good candidate or the virus is of low virulence. At no time do they ever think that maybe "viruses" are not the cause of sickness. This is bias, still alive in many virologists today.

— Val (@ValZimmer2) October 13, 2023

Do Viruses Exist? If Not, Then What Is It that Virologists Are Seeing Under a Microscope?

Thanks to Karen De Coster @ LRC and her post, "A Farewell to Virology."

If this topic interests you, I highly recommend that you listen to the new Tom Woods podcast, “Do Viruses Exist?" If this topic doesn’t interest you because you’ve been taught to never question the existence of so-called contagious viruses, you have an even better reason to listen to this podcast.

No, viruses do not exist, and finally, the case against the clown show known as virology is starting to be noticed among the podcast community. Tom interviews the heroic Dr. Mark Bailey, apparently, at the request of many of his listeners. Mark and his wife, Dr. Sam Bailey, are very adept at making the case against virology. Additionally, know that both of the Baileys are also well-versed in Austrian Economics.

Tom asks some good questions for a guy who is starting to explore this topic, and I love Dr. Bailey’s responses, especially as concerns his explanation of what an “anti-viral” really is, and what it really does. So much good stuff from Mark Bailey in this short interview. Problem is, Tom needs a Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, and maybe more with Dr. Bailey to touch on all of the foundational concepts of the topic. Here are a few links to browse.

• This is Dr. Sam Bailey’s website.
• Here is Dr. Mark Bailey’s 67-page paper, “A Farewell to Virology (Expert Edition)“.
• Here are links to my recent LRC blogs on this topic: (1) “The Great Fabrication: Viruses and Evil Bacteria” (2) “More Virus Lies. CDC Lies and Gets Caught” (3) “Germ Theory’s Greatest Hits: Now It’s Ebola” (4) “Endless Virology Clownery: RSV takes the Stage“

The End of Germ Theory

I was recently featured in a documentary titled "The End of Germ Theory" by Spacebusters. If you haven't watched it yet, I highly recommend it. Please enjoy and share it widely: https://t.co/OgEBhiRNRY

— Dr. Tom Cowan (@drtomcowan) June 27, 2022

Milton Joseph Rosenau is mentioned at the 1:47 mark in his "Experiments to Determine Mode of Spread of Influenza," along with the U.S. Navy and U.S. Public Health Service.    

The volunteers were all of the most susceptible age, mostly between 18 and 25, only a few of them around 30 years old; and all were in good physical condition.  None of these volunteers, 100 all told in number, had influenza; that is from the most careful histories that we could elicit, they gave no account of a febrile attack of any kind during the winter, except a few who were purposely selected, as having shown a typical attack of influenza, in order to test questions of immunity, and for the purpose of control.

Now, we proceeded rather cautiously at first by administering what they claim was a pure culture of the bacillus of influenza, meaning bacteria found in the boogers and lung fluid of people with Spanish flu symptoms called Pfeiffer’s bacillus, in a rather moderate amount, sprayed into the nostrils of a few healthy volunteers. 

EXPERIMENTS AT GALLOPS ISLAND

As the preliminary trials proved negative, we became bolder, and selecting nineteen of our volunteers, gave each one of them a very large quantity of a mixture of 13 different strains of the Pfeiffer bacillus, some of them obtained recently from the lungs of necropsy; other were subcultures of varying age, and each of the thirteen had, of course, a different history.