real reason health officials don’t want individual vaccine vials examined by independent scientists is that the vials are all different . . .

A data leak suggests the real reason health officials don’t want individual vaccine vials examined by independent scientists is that the vials are all different — and the mRNA in the shots is not intact.   https://t.co/Ev6DyTekhh

— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) September 14, 2022

While YouTube says that asserting vaccines are ineffective or have negative efficacy, oh, come on, let's not mince words, they don't work and they harm people, the latest coming out is showing how the novel mRNA inside the vaccine has been unstable and leaky.  By that I mean that the mRNA inside the lipid nanoparticles have leaked because the vaccines have not been kept at a prescribed temperatures inside the vials.  Dr. Mercola points out that 

The reason, it turns out, is because the vials are all different — and the mRNA in the shots “is not intact.” Both of these pose potentially serious problems. In an August 31, 2022, Substack article, Steve Kirsch explains:

“Even if you are getting 100% intact mRNA which would be really rare, you’re still not getting anything that resembles the virus. So the efficacy as far as PROTECTING you will be next to nothing.

However, what it will do very effectively, if you got reasonably intact mRNA, is to cause you significant harm. You are playing a game of chance with your immune system and what is in the bottle.” 

Here is YouTube's Vaccine Misinformation Policy:   

So, as YouTube tells you that contradicting any statement about the vaccines will be met with a strike against your YouTube channel.  YouTube loves censorship.  It may be the best thing they do.  YouTube WON'T READ THIS, so there's little risk of them comparing their own statements with these facts.  

The finding that the mRNA in the shots was of questionable quality was revealed in a BMJ feature investigation article2 published in March 2021. As explained by the author, journalist Serena Tinari, cyber attackers retrieved more than 40 megabytes of Pfizer COVID jab data from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in December 2020.

The hacked data was subsequently sent to journalists and academics worldwide. It was also published on the dark web. Some of the documents show European regulators had significant concerns over the lack of intact mRNA in the commercial batches sampled.

Compared to the clinical batches, i.e., the shots used in the clinical trial, 55% to 78% of the commercial shots had “a significant difference in % RNA integrity/truncated species.”

In one email, dated November 23, 2020, a high-ranking EMA official noted that the commercial batches failed to meet expected specifications, and that the implications of this RNA integrity loss were unclear. In response to the findings, the EMA sent a list of questions and concerns to Pfizer.

While we do not know if and how the EMA’s concerns were actually addressed and corrected, the EMA authorized Pfizer’s COVID jab December 21, 2020. According to its public assessment report, “the quality of this medicinal product, submitted in the emergency context of the current (COVID-19) pandemic, is considered to be sufficiently consistent and acceptable.”

Similarly, Health Canada told The BMJ that “changes were made in their processes to ensure that the integrity was improved and brought in line with what was seen for clinical trial batches.” The EMA further tried to deflect concern by claiming some of the leaked documents had been doctored. As reported by The BMJ:3