Wednesday, March 25, 2026

JARED TAYLOR: None of this white male stuff. That's for lab rats. You're a white man

I've made this point repeatedly.  Note how scientific terms enjoy re-classifying things and people into some scientific, a pseudo certain classification, like man to male?  Just as Taylor says, that's for lab rats.  Don't let the Left conduct lab or language experiments on you.  You're either a man or a woman.  Lot more pride in these terms than in lab classification that reduce you to sex only.

Tuesday, March 24, 2026

JOHN "TIG" TIEGEN: Yes, the U.S. tilted toward Iraq after Iran’s 1979 hostage crisis and revolution. The goal was to contain revolutionary Iran and protect Gulf oil routes.

Thanks to John TIG Tiegen,

Oh wow, a licensed attorney dropping the “U.S. gave Saddam the chemical weapons” greatest-hits meme like it’s fresh evidence in court.

Counselor, you bill clients for actual proof, right? So maybe glance at the declassified docs before you hit send: Here’s the accurate history (from declassified U.S. documents): • Yes, the U.S. tilted toward Iraq after Iran’s 1979 hostage crisis and revolution. Reagan removed Iraq from the terrorism sponsors list, shared satellite photos of Iranian troop positions, provided limited battlefield intelligence, and offered some economic/diplomatic help. The goal was to contain revolutionary Iran and protect Gulf oil routes. Declassified CIA files (released 2013) confirm officials knew Iraq was using chemical weapons and continued the tilt anyway. • No, the U.S. did not supply chemical weapons.
Iraq built its entire chemical weapons program primarily with European suppliers German companies (Karl Kolb and others) were the main source, along with firms from the Netherlands, Austria, France, and Egypt. This is documented in 1990s U.N. inspections, German court records, and the National Security Archive’s “Shaking Hands with Saddam” collection.
A few U.S. companies sold commercial pesticide precursors (dual-use) under export licenses, but the State Department began blocking or restricting them once Iraq’s chemical attacks were confirmed in 1983–84. The U.S. never provided chemical agents, munitions, or delivery systems. • “Hundreds of thousands killed” is inflated.
Iraq did use mustard gas, tabun, and sarin against Iranian human-wave attacks. Iranian and U.N. estimates put total chemical-weapons casualties (dead + injured) at roughly 50,000–100,000 over the 8-year war. Direct deaths from CW were in the low tens of thousands (often 2–5% fatality rate per attack). The war’s overall death toll (~500,000–1 million combined) was overwhelmingly from conventional weapons. U.S. policy in the 1980s was cynical realpolitik many historians (and even some Reagan officials later) criticize it as morally questionable. But claiming America “aided Iraq with chemical weapons” to mass-murder Iranians turns intelligence sharing into a false conspiracy. You skipped the part where facts > vibes, apparently. As a lawyer you should know better than to repeat TikTok history with the confidence of a guy who just passed the bar on vibes alone.

Next time bring exhibits, not memes. The court of public opinion still has standards.

(Real sources: National Security Archive, UN Iran-Iraq War reports, 2013 CIA declass.)

JOHN GUANDOLO: When Hamas (dba CAIR) applauds your decision—you are probably a shitbird.

found himself unable to strategically understand Iran’s role in the Global Islamic Movement. These are the kind of criminally negligent people we have running key components of the US government. Keep this in mind next time you wonder why the government is not defending liberty or vanquishing our enemies. --John Guandolo

When Hamas (dba CAIR) applauds your decision—you are probably a shitbird. This is the same Joe Kent who did NOTHING during his time as director of the NCTC to educate and train his people on the massive and imminently deadly Islamic Movement in the United States; called impending Al Qaeda attacks threats from “violent extremists,” thus, regurgitating jihadi narratives and advancing Islamic lines of operation; and found himself unable to strategically understand Iran’s role in the Global Islamic Movement. These are the kind of criminally negligent people we have running key components of the US government. Keep this in mind next time you wonder why the government is not defending liberty or vanquishing our enemies.

ALEXANDER DUNCAN: A 15ft Islamic sign on a Mountain in Arizona was vandalized and taken down. This is exactly what we need more of; we can no longer tolerate these pagan/demonic idols being erected all over our country.

The Ramadan Sharia Law symbol was put up on Butte Mountain, called "A Mountain" because a large letter "A" sits at its peak.  

Originally, the letter on Tempe Butte was an 'N', built by Tempe Normal School's class of 1918. The school changed its name to Tempe State Teacher's College in 1925, and the 'N' was adapted into a 'T'. Subsequently, three years later, the school would change its name again to Arizona State Teacher's College. It wasn't until 1938 that an “A” first appeared. It was formed from loose rocks and soon after, the fall ritual of whitewashing the "A" began. In 1952, vandals with dynamite completely destroyed the "A." The latest "A," made of reinforced steel and poured concrete, was built in 1955. It is 60 feet from its base to its top. 

Typical to see local news defend Muslims, Jihad, Sharia Law, Ramadan, and pagan symbols.  America, the fight is larger than you can imagine. 

SHAMI: Ramadan is a month of spirituality. 

Don't make me laugh. 

Ramadan is a time of peace, reflection, and community, but for Muslims here in the Valley, this year's observance is different.

SHAMI:  It's a sad time.  

Our officers received a report that the crescent moon had been pushed over and vandalized. 

On Tuesday, Tempe police officer, Lyndsey Fernandez says the crescent moon placed on Tempe's "A Mountain" meant to mark Ramadan was found knocked over and vandalized, causing $20,000 in damage.  

FERNANDEZ: This case has been assigned to a detective.  We are currently working on trying to figure out who did this.

Police say the cost of damages could determine whether charges are misdemeanor or felony.  And they're also investigating whether this could be a hate crime.

FERNANDEZ: Well, we're looking at the statue . . . criminal damage.  So what criminal damage means is what somebody's intent was intentionally or recklessly damaged property.

Usama Shami is the President of the Islamic Community Center of Phoenix says this act sends a painful message.  

SHAMI: If somebody puts a cross on A Mountain or wherever to celebrate a religious holiday, then that should be respected because we live in a city that is multiethnic, multicultural, multi-religious . . . 

Who is Usama Shami?

from Wikipedia,

Usama Shami is the President of the Islamic Community Center of Phoenix.[5] Sheikh Mahmoud Sulaiman, an Al-Azhar University graduate, has served as the imam of the mosque since 2002, prior to which he was imam at the Islamic Center of New Mexico in Albuquerque, New Mexico. 

But it comes as Muslims are gathering nightly, praying, reflecting, and breaking their fast together. 

SHAMI:  People concentrate on their spirituality and concentrate on giving and being charitable. 

A time meant for unity, this community says will not be overshadowed by recent attacks.  

SHAMI:  Incidents like that trying to take Muslims out of the spiritual concentration they have, ah, it's not going to work.  

In the incident from Phoenix last week, a man was arrested, accused of firing a pellet gun at a mosque and at people who were gathered outside celebrating Ramadan.  As far as the investigation here in Tempe, police tell me it is ongoing and they are trying to get that person who is responsible.  But they also say that they will continue to provide additional surveillance of mosques and any kind of religious places here in the Tempe area.  

Reporting live, Alexis Dominguez for Arizona's Family.