Wednesday, September 22, 2021

"anti-psychotic drugs . . . are just lobotomizing drugs . . ."

Most of these drugs create biochemical imbalances in brains that don't have any biochemical imbalances.

Wow.  If you're not scared to death by the list of drugs that cause brain damage and replace your natural goodness and decency with more violent and addictive inclinations or compulsions, then there's nothing that I can do for you.  Here is a shortlist of the drugs that Breggin mentions: Seroquel, Abilify, Motuda, Rispiradol, and others.  These are very damaging to the brain, causing damage to a part of the brain called the Basal Ganglia, which leads to a condition called tardive dyskinesia.  This condition shortens the life span by 20 years because it causes cardiovascular problems.  Not good.

The newer antipsychotic drugs destroy your metabolism, leading to metabolic syndrome and causing too many to become obese and develop diabetes, pancreatitis, and elevated cholesterol.  Most of these drugs create biochemical imbalances in brains that don't have any biochemical imbalances.  For obesity and diabetes, take resveratrol.  And the brand that I recommend is Bill Sardi's formula, Longevinex



For sleep, take Melatonin and GABA.  If you want energy, take vitamin D, C (which extends your lifespan by 5 to 7 years), and zinc.  Avoid this other brain-damaging crap.  


At the very end of his presentation, Breggin tells us that he's created a guide for getting off of these drugs.  So you're not alone.  That guide comes in the form of a book that you can see below, or you can rely on his pdf, which is free.  

Tuesday, September 21, 2021

MURDER SUICIDE COUNTED AS COVID DEATH

 

little clots in the capillary network are microscopic and they are scattered, so they're not going to show on any scan.

12:51:  Virtually impossible to prevent an infection that comes from the airwaves.  What you can do after that bug has entered your airway epithelial cells is to prevent it from disseminating by the body into the bloodstream.  This is what, for instance, the vaccination against pneumococci or meningococci aims at--to prevent the dissemination in the blood.  Now, this virus does not disseminate in the blood.  It kills people because it's in the lung and the lung suffers.  So how can anyone think that by vaccination of oneself that one can be protected against infection of the lungs?  This is completely naive.  And I wonder that my American associates, physicians, colleagues don't stand up and tell you guys about this.  Why do you have to wait for me to come around and tell you this?  I learned this from the American teachers, from American textbooks.  

Now, the second thing is this:  if you're under 70 years of age, you're going to have a really, really difficult time dying of COVID 19.  

The Moderna vaccine has 40 trillion messenger RNA molecules in it.  So when someone gets the shot, you're getting your genes re-wired.  These are wrapped in a lipid capsule that enables them to be absorbed into the cells.  This is injected into the deltoid muscle of the arm.  Like I said, only 25% of the vaccine actually stays there, and the rest is taken up by the lymphatic system and fed into the general circulation or blood vessels.  And so it circulates around the entire body, And I think every doctor knows that absorption occurs in the capillary networks because that's where the blood slows right down.  It goes through so these nanocapsules containing these trillions of messenger RNA molecules are absorbed into the lining around the capillaries, what medically we call the vascular endothelium.  So these little packages are absorbed around the vessels, the packages open, and the body recognizes these messenger RNA strands as a gene and gets to work making COVID spiked proteins.  So in a virus, those COVID spiked proteins form part of the viral capsule.  The problem is that they're not in a virus; they're in the cells around blood vessels.  As a result, they become part of the cell wall of that cell.  So normally, the cells that surround your blood vessels have to be smooth to have good and unimpeded blood flow.  But as soon as you've got all of these little spike proteins that become part of the cell wall become a rough surface.  It's going to be like very coarse sandpaper.  It's now what the platelets are going to interpret as a damaged vessel.  It's no longer smooth.  So clotting is inevitable because platelets that come down that vessel are going to hit a rough spot and act like "this must be a damaged vessel, this vessel must be plugged up to stop the bleeding."  Clots are inevitable because of these spiked proteins in the capillary networks.  I set out to then try and prove this.  Could this theory be correct?  And so these little clots in the capillary network are microscopic and they are scattered, so they're not going to show on any scan.  It's too small and too scattered.  It's not like the big clots that cause strokes and heart attacks.  They're too small and too scattered.  So how on earth can we know if the person has clotted?  And the only way to find out is with a blood test called a D-dimer.  So the D-dimer is a blood test that shows up a recent clot.  It won't show up an old clot, it will show up a new clot.  And it doesn't tell you where the clot is; it only tells you that the clotting process has been activated.  

If you want healthy capillaries, you'll need to take vitamin C and Niacin. 

If you want to prevent blood clots in all blood vessels, then you'll need Nattokinase. 

After recording 500 cases of paralysis and 53 deaths from the 1976 Swine Flu Epidemic vaccine, that vaccine was pulled off the market.

Dr. Ben Edwards.  Trained as a family physician.  Did my undergrad at Baylor, UT Houston Medical School, and then Waco for Family Practice Residency Training, where I was chief resident.  I spent the first 7 years in private practice at Garza County Health Clinic in Post Texas as the only physician in the County.  For the last seven, eight years I've had my own practice with Veritas Medical in Lubbock, Abilene, and San Angelo.  Thank you for the opportunity to testify today.

I'd like to begin with a reminder to everyone about the definition of evidence-based medicine that Sackett-Straus et al laid out back in 2000.  stated that the elements of evidence-based practice are: 

1) the integration of best-researched evidence with clinical expertise and patient values.  Patient values trump clinical expertise, and clinical expertise trumps scientific evidence. 

I'm also concerned that the forced and coerced COVID19 vaccination would, in my opinion, be a violation of the Nuremberg Code [who in our legal system would dare prosecute any violation of the NC?], the UN International Covenant on civil and political rights, Article 7, the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 3, and UNESCO's Article 6 of the Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights.  In addition, I have some concerns similar to what Senator Hall already mentioned.  According to the CDC's Vaccination Adverse Events Reporting System, which I have some updated numbers from last night when I downloaded these:

4178 deaths are now being reported on VAERS.  To give some context over the past 20 years, all vaccinations combined, there was a reported 4,182 deaths over the past 20 years.

In the past 4 months, we are now sitting on 4,178 deaths associated with the COVID vaccine reported to VAERS.  This includes a 15-year-old boy in Colorado, two sixteen-year-old girls in Wisconsin, a 17-year-old girl in Wisconsin, and a 17-year-old boy from New Hampshire all healthy.

Evidence is pretty clear that VAERS grossly underestimates the adverse events that are reported.  A study commissioned by the Department of Health and Human Services in 2010 and carried out by Harvard University, concluded that only about 1% of adverse reactions were ever reported to VAERS.  A similar study in 2015 by Shimabukuro et al came to a similar conclusion.  A 1995 report by the CDC also found that certain adverse reactions to vaccines are reported about 1% of the time.  Even vaccine manufacturers themselves have estimated a 50-fold under-reporting of adverse reactions.  So I have grave concern about under-reporting about these adverse reactions to VAERS and even at that, we're over 4,000 now in deaths.  To give you some context, as Senator Hall already mentioned the 1976 Swine Flu Epidemic, after recording 500 cases of paralysis and 53 deaths, the vaccine was pulled off the market.  Personally, I've received numerous reports from family members of my patients, close friends of my patients that within hours to days of receiving the vaccine, they've suffered from a stroke, heart attack, pulmonary embolism, blood clots, sudden death, and as far as these family members knew none of these were reported by the medical staff as being associated with the vaccine.  So my concern is that indeed there is vast under-reporting.  Lastly, I would say of Harvey Rich's data that 53% of Texans have natural immunity   Studies have shown a 2-to-3-fold increased risk of adverse reaction to this vaccine if you've already had COVID.  Natural immunity confers a more robust immunity than vaccine immunity could, but vaccinating someone whose already robustly immune increases their risk of adverse reaction 2-to-3 fold.  Two different studies show that.  

And probably the last thing that I would have to say is I am very much a proponent of preserving the individual doctor-patient relationship.  It's a sacred relationship and I believe nothing should come between that and ultimately it's up to the patient to decide how they want to treat their body.  And on a personal note, I believe that God gave us an amazing robust immune system and I don't think that you can improve on God.  No one, not everyone obviously has to agree with that but for those who do and choose to rely on that natural immunity, I think we need to uphold that right to do so without any adverse outcomes on their livelihood.  Thank you for the opportunity to speak.  Happy to answer questions.  

QUESTION #1: Do people with natural immunity to COVID need a vaccine, and is there any increase risk of the natural immune system individuals having an adverse reaction to the vaccine? 

ANSWER:  Natural immunity is more robust than vaccine immunity.  There's a study from the original SARS back in 2002, the people that survived that first SARS, they've looked at them 17 years later and they showed robust immunity still to SARS COV-1 . . . 17 years later.  Historically, we've already, we've always known that natural immunity tends to last a lifetime.  In other words, the measles natural immunity will last a lifetime.  So, no, I don't believe there's any need to vaccinate someone who's already acquired natural immunity.  And we need to remember that natural immunity is more than just antibodies.  You have T-cells, Natural Killer cells, you've got the innate immune response.  You've got a robust immune system, not just antibodies.  And to the second part, reiterating that if you've already had COVID naturally, and some of these will be asymptomatic people and some people won't have a positive antibody test because their T-cells were strong enough that they didn't need to mount an antibody response so you can't catch all these guys with an antibody screen.  But if you had natural immunity, as over 50% of Texans have, then you're at a two-to-three-fold increased risk of an adverse reaction if you get vaccinated.  

QUESTION #2: Can people do anything about their immune system? 

ANSWER:  Absolutely.  Thank you for asking, Senator Hall.  I transitioned from Conventional Family Practice Medicine to Integrative Medicine, integrating our God-given natural ability for the body to fix itself and it's clear in the literature that if we steward this God-given design through nutrition, proper nutrition, hydration, sunlight, most importantly peace, not fear.  Fear has overcome this nation, the spirit of fear that I don't submit to has overcome this nation in my opinion, and if that's influencing policy decisions, I don't want to have to be subjected to those policies.  So, yes, there's much that you can do to improve your immune system.  And it sounds too simple but it's true--eat God food, not man food.  Exercise, get some sunlight, move around a little bit, and most importantly be at peace.  Your immune system will do what it's designed to do.  Thank you.

Monday, September 20, 2021

The tide is turning even if it may not seem like it . . .

15:35 to 16:10  It's so dangerous to your immune system, it wrecks it.  It’s the vaccinated who are breeding these variants because the vaccine doesn’t attack the virus.  And it probably teaches the virus to attack the antibodies and turn them into virus replication factories.  That’s called ADE.  

Not considered vaccinated until the second dose.  The famous folks he lists at the beginning who died from the shots do not qualify as a COVID death because they didn't have their second COVID shot.  

22:00  What they're doing is in violation of the Nuremberg Code.  They're literally engaging in a war crime.  They are literally forcing people to engage in medical experimentation and using their job as coercion.  These are war crimes playing out in front of us, and these fucking morons are clapping when a mom gets escorted off a plane because her two-year-old is having an asthma attack and she took the mask off.  Clap, you fucking sheep!  They'll come for you later.  Don't worry.  Of course, the vaccine is going to take care of a lot of you.  That's the reality.  

23:40  Pull your head out of your fucking ass, fucking Seattle Children's.  [I guess calling themselves "Seattle's Children" is a little too obvious of what the services are really about.  Here he cites a Times of Israel article, titled, "STUDY: COVID Recovery Gave Israelies Longer-Lasting Delta Defense Than Vaccines," Nathan Jeffay, September 2, 2021.  The vaccinated are a danger to everybody because they are spreading these variants, they are breeding these variants because they are getting sick and winding up in the hospital.  And you can lie to our faces, piss on us and tell us it's raining, but we don't fucking believe you anymore and this movement, this understanding has reached critical mass and there's no putting this genie back in the bottle. 

24:30  As they pushing to inject people with something that's going to make most of them sick.  Think about that.  Who the fuck are these people? What an epic, complete fucking failure of the medical system.  They have destroyed the trust that has taken over a century to build. . .

26:30  Reading from the Seattle Children's Religious Exemption form, he says, "Please explain why the COVID vaccines are objectionable based on your religious beliefs . . . while at least some others are not.  Please attach additional pages if needed to provide a full response.  

"Well, as a Quaker, I believe in personal responsibility.  And the fact that the hospitals are taking no responsibility; the fact that the doctors are taking no responsibility; the fact that the manufacturers are taking no fucking responsibility; the fact that the government is taking no fucking responsibility, but me taking this shot is me exercising responsibility in doing my part to be responsible?  Fuck you people!" 

28:00  Find a group.  Help each other out.  They're not going to save us.  We have to save ourselves.  We have to understand that.  [He cites John O'Looney who was a SAIF member of the Funeral Directors' Association.  And?] 

After watching this video this morning Tuesday, October 5, 2021, for 30 minutes, it shut down and was no longer available.  Unbelievable. 

From Pfizer's own documents--stay away from the vaxxed

From GreenEggsnHam.