ROLAND ANGLE: NIST wrapped so many lies around each other regarding WTC Building 7 that it takes a professional to undo them all

[RG911Team] The government’s 9/11 lies are like a Russian doll.

As structural engineer Roland Angle explained in the documentary “Seven”, NIST wrapped so many lies around each other regarding WTC Building 7 that it takes a professional to undo them all. pic.twitter.com/1ipzuAyyaV

— Richard Gage, AIA, Architect (@RichardGage_911) September 19, 2024

KEVIN RYAN: if you look at the official account of 9/11 carefully, you see that all the evidence arose from [the CIA and the FBI] and the 9/11 Commission Report itself is just basically a plea to citizens to just trust the FBI and trust the CIA because, of course, they must have our best interest at heart.

The CIA controlled the evidence against the suspects' alleged torture testimonies on which the 9/11 Commission Report was based.  All this evidence was controlled and, in some cases, destroyed by the FBI and the CIA.  Really if you look at the official account of 9/11 carefully, you see that all the evidence arose from these agencies and the 9/11 Commission Report itself is just basically a plea to citizens to just trust the FBI and trust the CIA because, of course, they must have our best interest at heart.  But yeah, the intelligence agencies were controlling all information and all evidence after 9/11.  --Kevin Ryan

In 2020 I gave a presentation that reviewed the parallels between Covid and 9/11. YouTube took the video down saying it was “against its community standards.” Simple observation is against YouTube standards. Here’s an interview covering the same material. https://t.co/eYCed3av2c

— Kevin Ryan (@KevinRyan911) August 22, 2024

Kevin Ryan's website is DigWithin.net, very difficult to find on your standard search on Google or DuckDuckGo.

11:32. Your 4th observation is "False Official Accounts."

11:39. Yes, the 9/11 Commission Report is an example.  It's false in a lot of ways.  It ignored a lot of the evidence and that as I wrote in an article on my blog the 9/11 Commission actually claimed 63 times in its report that it couldn't find evidence for many of the critical aspects of the crimes and then based its own report on the 9/11 Commission report was based largely on myth and torture testimony which is now known to be false.  For example, one of the primary torture test testimonies that was used was from a man named Abu Zubaydah, who in 2009 the US government admitted had no connection to Al Qaeda at all yet he was the one who allegedly identified Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Ramzi bin al-Shibh and then those stories kind of evolved into the 9/11 Commission Report.  But people may remember that those torture testimonies were videotaped despite not being given to the 9/11 Commission.  And the videotapes were actually destroyed before they could be witnessed by people outside of the intelligence agencies.  Then this report also avoids a lot of the evidence, as I mentioned, they contradicted their own experiments and ultimately they resorted to using a computer model that they claimed we are not allowed to see because it might jeopardize Public Safety and all of that really leads us to understand that the official accounts are clearly false and that's an important piece of evidence with regard to the idea that maybe these were inside jobs.

13:20.  I remember that the 9/11 Commission took a lot of testimonies from people that were never included in their report.  Isn't that right?

13:32. That's true.  A  great example was of the World Trade Center custodian, William Rodriguez.  William was a great hero at first, having saved so many people from having the key to the stairwell allowing people to escape and helping them escape.  But William wouldn't stop talking about explosions happening in the lower levels of the building and when it was clear he wouldn't stop talking about it, his testimony was not included in the report and he was no longer considered a hero.

14:08.  Now your 5th observation about 9/11 is that it was preceded by exercises mimicking the events.  Could you talk about the exercises?

14:22. Yeah well I talked largely about the air defense exercises although there were other types of exercises that preceded the events.  The air defense exercises were the ones that caught my attention the most.  And later, after 9/11 records were released, showed that NORAD had practiced 28 hijack exercises events within just the 20 months before 9/11 in contradicting the idea that they weren't looking for hijackings within the United States.  Six of those NORAD hijacking events actually practiced hijackings located entirely in the United States.  One of them practiced interception of a hijacked airliner that was meant to crash into the United Nations building, which is in New York City and just a few blocks from the World Trade Center.  And another one practiced just before 9/11, just a couple of months before 9/11, had a planning document with a picture of Osama bin Laden on the cover.  So NORAD said that several exercises were planned for the day of 9/11, but we found out that actually two of them were being conducted on the day of 9/11.  One of them called Vigilant Guardian, and another called Apollo Guardian.  Add it's clear from the testimonies released by the 9/11 Commission by the people involved in these exercises that they confused an obstructed the national defenses.

16:10.  6th observation about the events of 9/11 is the "Insider Trading," which obviously shows foreknowledge of the events.  What do we know about the insider trading?

Well, we know that there were a dozen countries that opened investigations into insider trading right after the 9/11 attacks.  There was a lot of evidence for financial crimes and that included what are called "put options" on the affected companies, or bets that the stock of certain companies would go down, like the airline companies and such.  Treasury bond trades.  There were credit card transactions made at the World Trade Center in massive amounts just before it was destroyed.  The people in charge of the investigation to this insider trading let the suspects off the hook.  Just to be clear, the Security Exchange Commission names specific people as suspects in 9/11 insider trading, and handed that information off to the FBI and the 9/11 Commission, and the FBI and the 9/11 Commission didn't even interview those suspects.  One of those people is someone we've talked about before, Wirt Dexter Walker, III, who headed the security company for the World Trade Center complex was specifically named along with his wife as a suspect in 9/11 insider trading by the Securities Exchange Commission and he and his wife were not even interviewed.  The government simply concluded that yes it looked like insider trading occurred but since it was not done by people who could conceivably link to Al Qaeda, it couldn't have been insider trading which is just amazing that they got away with that.  And frankly, the other countries after seeing the United States approached approach to it ended up ultimately dropping their investigation too.

18:05. With regard to your 7th observation about 9/11, you list "Suspicious Benefits for a Powerful Few."

18:20. Yeah after 9:11 I think we all know that the defense industry was given a huge increase in funding in profit as the war is preceded afterwards but also companies that were in the oil industry like Halliburton made a killing after 9/11.  Oil and gas companies benefited tremendously from the takeover of the countries involved in the 9/11 wars, like Afghanistan and Iraq.  Really the 911 narrative ended up being very profitable for some people.

18:53. Your 8th observation about 9/11 is "Intel Agencies Control of Information."  So were the intelligence agencies controlling the information on the events of 9/11?

19:10. Yes, absolutely.  After 9/11, all the evidence related to the attacks was controlled by the FBI and CIA.  The FBI controlled the crime scenes.  They controlled the witnesses.  The CIA controlled the evidence against the suspects' alleged torture testimonies on which the 9/11 Commission Report was based.  All this evidence was controlled and, in some cases, destroyed by the FBI and the CIA.  Really if you look at the official account of 9/11 carefully, you see that all the evidence arose from these agencies and the 9/11 Commission Report itself is just basically a plea to citizens to just trust the FBI and trust the CIA because, of course, they must have our best interest at heart.  But yeah, the intelligence agencies were controlling all information and all evidence after 9/11.

20:08. With regard to your 9th observation about 9/11, you cite an "Elusive, All-Powerful Enemy," for instance Al-Qaeda.

20:18. Yeah okay was clearly an all-powerful enemy if you believe the official account they showed up everywhere they had the power to do things that you wouldn't imagine people having the power to do just show up anywhere in the world and bring unsuspecting people over to their side any person can turn into Al Qaeda operatives if you believe the official account of terrorism over the years they were always terrorizing us in ways though that led to the seizure in the transport of natural resources so if you look at the map of where Al Qaeda and it's associated terrorist groups were located they were all around the areas where production of critical oil and gas resources and other resources were occurring and the transport lines were all outlined by these groups where these groups were committing their terrorist attacks.  But if you believe the news it's unbelievable to some extent they were generating videos after they capture people and they put them just as if they were American law enforcement agencies exactly as if they were they would put captives in these orange jumpsuits and so we'd see these videos with suspicious looking terrorists surrounded by these poor people in orange jumpsuits so they make these videos they have their own website they had apparently vast Financial Networks very capable communication systems and really for whatever reason Al Qaeda just could not be stopped.

21:54. With regard to your 10th observation you cite "Abuse of Science, Pseudoscience."  Now what do you mean by that?

22:05. What what I mean is this is what really what brought me into the investigation of 9/11 you know I work for Underwriters Laboratories my company was involved in helping the National Institute of standard and Technology complete the official report and I was watching it of course very closely and I saw the contradictions between what tests were performed and the conclusions that were drawn and if you look at the official investigation into the World Trade Center closely, you see that pseudoscience is really the best way to describe it pseudoscience has been described in detail by academic researchers who looked into certain abuses of science for political purposes and this investigation reflects that pseudoscience approach perfectly there were very few experiments done the results of the experiments that we're done we're ignored or contradicted in the conclusions there was no peer review input from concern to dependent scientists was ignored the findings can't be replicated or falsified which is a basic requirement of science because NIST withheld their data it would not share it and the one hypothesis that was supported by most of the evidence that is the demolition of the World Trade Center buildings was ignored throughout the investigation so really science was abused very badly in the official investigation into 9/11.

32:36. Your 11th observation is "Censorship of Dissent."  Now how did we see that happening after 9/11?

23:45. Well, those of us who were speaking out about 9/11 on the inconsistencies of the official account and questions about what wasn't covered were censored I can tell you I was interviewed by the New York Times and Reuters, and mainstream news outlets in the early years and it was so obvious that they were not going to give us a fair chance to produce our questions publicly. For example, the New York Times asked me a number of questions on one of their stories and they left out almost everything that I responded with in favor of some folks who are supporting the official account

[RG911Team] The most disturbing thing is that the government investigation into the collapse of these buildings did not even test for explosive residue.

[RG911Team] If you make a mistake in a controlled demolition, the top of the building will topple over and fall away from the rest.

But if you fly an airplane into it, the top will topple over… then crush the rest like a jackhammer. 🤔

That’s the official 9/11 story: a joke. pic.twitter.com/MpLwXabHni

— Richard Gage, AIA, Architect (@RichardGage_911) November 22, 2023

[RG911Team] Controlled demolition expert Tom Sullivan has a lot to say about 9/11… and his explosives analysis confirms what survivors experienced at the World Trade Center. Here is part 1 of our interview with him… pic.twitter.com/tJGwOICTAI

— Richard Gage, AIA, Architect (@RichardGage_911) November 21, 2023

[RG911Team] The most disturbing thing is that the government investigation into the collapse of these buildings did not even test for explosive residue. From the NIST agency website: pic.twitter.com/afwVCLOeoa

— Richard Gage, AIA, Architect (@RichardGage_911) November 22, 2023

I encourage everybody to read a little more and learn a little more about the September 11, 2001 destruction of the Twin Towers in Manhattan, Building 7, and the destruction of our civil liberties through the PATRIOT Act.  Richard Gage is the key guy for looking at the structure and engineering of the towers as well as expert analysis on their demolition.