if it's a permanent cover-up, then it's an act of war, it's hiding things which everyone on your commission knew that the Pentagon was changing their stories, lying to you, then it's a cover-up, an act of war. Under Article 3, Section 2 of The Constitution it's treason

[RG911Team] One of the most shocking claims about 9/11 didn’t come from a radio shock jock or a social media troll.

It came from 9/11 Commission member Bob Kerrey.

What do you think he meant by this? pic.twitter.com/LxALE8FDkR

— Richard Gage, AIA, Architect (@RichardGage_911) April 11, 2024

Do you support a criminal investigation into 9/11?  I know yours wasn't exposition it was not a criminal investigation.

I don't know I do support a permanent commission to examine not to sap but lots of other things in this area 

But if it's a permanent cover-up, then it's an act of war, it's hiding things which everyone on your commission knew that the Pentagon was changing their stories, lying to you, then it's a cover-up, an act of war.  Under Article 3, Section 2 of The Constitution it's treason, and unless we get to the very bottom of it then we're still talking, you know, a treasonous exposition.