We are shotgunning lots of DNA into billions of people. Some of this DNA may hit germ lines, it may hit stem cells, it may hit sperm, it may hit egg. If you do the numbers, the number of LNPs that we're putting in these things they're in the 50-billion range to maybe 100-billion range. If 1% of these get to the ovaries, there's only 300,000 oocytes, so you're talking about 40 to 400 million maybe of these things hitting 300,000 oocytes. There's a chance that this stuff gets into the germ line, and we can't rule that out. That is done now on billions of people and it's almost mandated. This is a radical decay in biomedical ethics community that this has occured, a massive departure from where we were back in the days when we were thinking about CRISPR babies, i.e., designer babies, first ones born in 2018. Why are we tolerating this experimental use on tools that are poorly characterized, mandated with liability protection?
[Germ line refers to the sex cells (eggs and sperm) that sexually reproducing organisms use to pass on their genomes from one generation to the next (parents to offspring). This is what Bill Gates' scientists and those hired by Fauci target: your sacred future. They could care less about your health. They are avowed eugenicists.]
When Kevin says it's in the germ line he's talking about genomic changes in the ovaries, that means your children will have those genomic changes and then their children will, right?
Forever, yes. Sperm and egg are germ lines if it hits your stem cells, like in your bone marrow, you can run into cancer problems. Those are immune privial cells, so they don't get cleaned up by the immune system and these things end up persisting probably for the rest of your life if it's in your stem cells.
#3 - “No one told the patients, hey, you’re going to be put on this vent. It’s probably going to kill you, but it may protect the healthcare workers,” testified attorney @RenzTom to the Pennsylvania State Senate earlier this year. “No one told the families that.” pic.twitter.com/Tk8t1f7iY1
And she has audio recordings of a conversation between her and a nurse I recently publicized. The nurse is talking about how they're killing people in the hospital, how their floor was doing the things that no other floor would do because, well, no other floor wanted to carry out the murder essentially. They knew what was happening in a lot of cases. Dr. Mercola just put out a paper where he discussed ventilators. Ventilators, that concept for ventilators came from China. If you put a ventilator on someone's face, they can't cough on you, so we'll keep the healthcare worker safe, right?
Even though that we knew that 75% or so of the people in New York City put on ventilators were dying, we kept doing it to protect the healthcare workers. That was the theory. Now no one talked about that when the patients were going in there. there. No one told the patients, "Hey, you're being protected . . . you're going to be put on this. this. It's probably going to kill you, but it may protect the healthcare workers. No one told the families that. And by the way, we actually had whistleblower testimony from a yet-to-be unmasked whistleblower, and probably won't be, who worked from CMS. I've got data from CMS that showed in a number of Texas hospitals that as high as 90% of patients put on the vent died. 90%. Now they wouldn't let you try Ivermectin but they were more than willing to put you on the vent where you had a 90% fatality rate you're telling me that they didn't notice the you're telling me that the doctors on those floors I mean listen you know I can't say all doctors are created equal McCullough is ahead above most. But if you got through med school, you could probably . . . I would think you would probably be smart enough to notice that when 9 out of 10 of your patients and when they're put on the vent die, at least maybe you should ask the question, Is there a better way? Why not let someone try Ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine if you have a 9 out of 10 chance of dying anyways?
The reason that that's dear to my heart is because the people called me and I fought with hospital after hospital after hospital to try and save their lives. And as I testified last year here, we essentially legislated these deaths into being by incentivizing the use of Remdesivir in protocols incentivizing the use of ventilators, and incentivizing, again not people recovering from COVID but people dying from COVID. You got a cash bonus when someone died from COVID. So it was and incentive to kill people and it worked incredibly well. I'm happy to revisit that but again my testimony from last year covered that.
* And how strangers can get real-time access to your car cameras.
* Explores trackers in cars that you had no idea existed like the radio signals beaconed out by your tires that can be used to track you even if you're doing 70 miles an hour down the freeway.
* We dive into the perverse incentives that drive companies to collect as much data about you as possible and look at the history of when this all started.
Spoiler alert: it's been going on far longer than you ever imagined. And don't even get me started on used cars. We look at how the previous owner of your car might still have access to all your car's remote features, tracking tools, and cameras. And we explain how to wipe your own information and location history from your car before you sell it. These are the kinds of things we investigate as we dive under the hood of car privacy in the series.
WHAT DATA IS YOUR CAR COLLECTING?
What data is siphoned from your car every time you hit the road?
John McElroy,
"Your car knows where you're going it knows your kind of driving habits."
In short the modern car has become a privacy nightmare.
Andrea
Cars collect a lot of data and I don't know that consumers really understand how much data is being collected by vehicles the new trend in automotive is to talk about the software defined vehicles
Which essentially means turning cars into smartphones.
In what ways are cars like smartphones? Well first, they both act as tracking devices, emitting all kinds of radio signals that can be used to pinpoint your location.
Woody,
Your car is a cell phone. Your car is a wireless hotspot. Your car is a Wi-Fi receiver, and your car is a Bluetooth transmitter and receiver.
But there are other important similarities too. Just as we often think of our phones as singular entities that send off data to Google and Apple, we regard cars the same way, sending off our data to Mazda or Toyota. But with our phones, data sharing doesn't stop with the device manufacturer because we then go ahead and install a hundred different apps on it and each of these apps also sends our data to countless companies. It turns out that car is actually working a similar way cars are platforms where a lot of other services are bolted on top most consumers don't realize that when they're driving you know there's a hundred s of companies literally that are collecting data from that vehicle and profiling you.
Lauren Smith,
Some information might be going to the manufacturer. Some may be staying locally on the car. Some may be going to your insurance company. Some may be going to a technology that you've opted in to use.
So exactly what information is being collected and where it's going is pretty hard to figure out. Varying by the make and model of the car, however, one thing we know for sure about basically all modern cars is: data is being harvested by the trunk load.
Sam Curry:
The easiest way to figure out what exactly your car is tracking and has access to is to just open the app.
Sam Curry has spent a lot of time examining these car apps where you do things like check the engine status and check your vehicle's cameras.
If you ever wanted to see where your car is at, or like start your car, or unlock your car, you can now do that with your phone.
The actual data that gets logged by the car includes video feeds, microphone feeds. The actual GPS location like overtime is 100% being logged. Your car has the systems built in that'll actually log every interaction with the vehicle so whether or not you unlock the car, turn the engine on, the air conditioner on, starting an engine, or finding a vehicle's location.
These are generally marketed as really convenient features for consumers.
Being able to control and locate your vehicle via like your phone is like a really cool thing.
But it's also important to remember this fundamental principle:
Woody:
If the app is free you are the product.
Sam Curry:
By just like using the apps, you're kind of just giving that data to that company. They'll probably . . . hold it in perpetuity.
And often we're not just handing our data to those companies . We are granting carte blanche to share our sensitive information with countless third parties.
