Warning: Bill Gates has taken control of the global production and warehousing of seeds

Bill Gates is not only owning the most farmland in America. He has also taken control of the global production and warehousing of seeds. pic.twitter.com/sAUNOV74CW

— James Melville (@JamesMelville) December 6, 2022

from StrangeSounds.org.

This hijacking of farmers’ seeds is best highlighted with the shameful removal of India’s pre-eminent rice research scientist Dr. R.H. Richaria, as the head of India’s Central Rice Research Institute (CRRI) in Cuttack, Orissa, which housed the largest collection of rice diversity in the world, for refusing to allow the IRRI in the Philippines to pirate the collection out of India. With his removal at the behest of the World Bank, Indian peasant intellectual property was hijacked to the IRRI in the Philippines which later became part of the newly created Consultative Group of International Agriculture Research (CGIAR). [2]

Wow, the BMGF really is trying to colonize the world into ever-shrinking feudal valleys.  

Farmers’ seed heritage was held in the private seed banks of CGIAR, a consortium of 15 international agricultural research centers, controlled by the World Bank, the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations, as well as of course the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), which since 2003, has poured more than $720 million into the CGIAR centres. CGIAR gene banks presently manage 768,576 accessions of farmer’ seeds. Taken together, CGIAR gene banks represent the largest and most widely used collections of crop diversity in the world.[3]

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation operates a bit like the World Bank, using its financial power and prowess to take control of agriculture and influence government and institutional agricultural policies. By far the largest funder of the CGIAR, Gates has successfully accelerated the transfer of research and seeds from scientific research institutions to commodity-based corporations, centralizing and facilitating the pirating of intellectual property and seed monopolies through intellectual property laws and seed regulations. 

BTW, Gates may have billions and donate billions into projects, but know this: his money does not equate success.  In fact, almost anything that his money touches fails in terms of enhancing human existence.  His is an utter failure.  

The aim of “One CGIAR”, overseen by “One CGIAR Common Board’ is to merge it to become part of “One Agriculture”, aka “Gates Ag One” – Gates’ latest move in controlling the world’s seed supply. [5] Gates has indicated he will more than double the CGIAR present budget, from $850 million to $2 billion a year.

Despite the long-recognized failure of the Green Revolution in India and Mexico, in 2006 Gates launched AGRA, the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa. The folly of imposing this failed technology in Africa is well documented in the two following articles by Nicoletta Dentico and Tim Wise. 

And this, 

The Seed Freedom movement has been calling for the CGIAR gene banks to return these stolen farmers varieties back to the farmers. The lessons of the Green Revolution since the 1960’s have shown us that the chemical path of monocultures has undermined Earth’s capacity to support life and food production by destroying biodiversity, soil and water [6, 7] as well as contributing to climate change. [8] It has dispossessed small farmers through debt for external inputs. And it has undermined food and nutritional security. [9] The experience of the last half century has made clear that Seed Sovereignty, Food Sovereignty and Knowledge Sovereignty is the only viable future of food and farming.

Peggy Hall Talks with Dr. Roopa Chari

Peggy is talking with Dr. Roopa Chari, owner of Chari Center of Health.  She describes herself as 

Dr. Roopa Chari, M.D. is an Integrative Functional Medicine Physician & Internist.

Dr. Chari is a medical doctor, and she graduated from the Medical College of Ohio and completed her internship and residency at NorthShore University HealthSystem affiliated with the University of Chicago with a specialty in Internal Medicine.

She practices Integrative Medicine for over 23 years providing virtual consultations. She is the Medical Director of a family-owned Integrative Medical Clinic called the Chari Center of Health. Dr. Chari specializes in creating customized programs for:

• Weight Loss
• Natural Hormone Balance
• Gut health

She has a leading-edge natural approach for treating the underlying causes of both physical and psychological conditions with proven natural remedies, mind/body techniques, and advanced wellness technologies to get results for her patients.

We have 2 brains, main brain, and the entire digestive system.  Our digestive system is responsive to our thoughts.  We're feeling what we're thinking.  Our 2nd brain is in our gut.  Rest and digest.  Sit down, have a meal, play nice music, get into a rest where your digestive system releases digestive enzymes.   

from Justice to Just Us

The Scales of Justice have been handed down through the centuries as [Themis'] most important symbol in law. 

We have degenerated from the principles of honor and justice. The antics of the mainstream press have been deliberately seeking to manipulate elections just as Hillary accused Putin when she lost. https://t.co/8W8gRxcDGJ

— Armstrong Economics (@StrongEconomics) December 7, 2022

Thank you to Martin Armstrong @ Armstrong Economics.  

The bronze sculpture of Copenhagen symbolizes the corruption that has infected the entire world’s legal system. While this shows a starving African carrying the fat symbol of law with his tiny scales that were the symbol of justice, we have degenerated from the original Greek symbol of Justice – Themis, who is also known as the Lady of Good Counsel. She was a Titaness from ancient Greece, famous for being a much-used symbol of justice for she was the organizer of communal affairs. Her very name, Themis, means in ancient Greek – “divine law.”  The Scales of Justice have been handed down through the centuries as her most important symbol in law. They were to demonstrate a pragmatic and balanced outlook in search of the truth. Since the 16th century, she has been depicted wearing a blindfold intended to represent impartiality.

[Note how some cultures and institutions carve the image of Themis: sometimes she holds the scales of justice between her fingertips.  Sometimes with her whole hand.  Sometimes her sword is resting with point touching the ground.  Sometimes it is raised, poised to execute harsh, even lethal penalties, like an eye for an eye.  Sometimes standing on a viper to conceal tendencies and reputations of law and justice as a form of revenge.]

Of course, we have degenerated from the principles of honor and justice. The antics of the mainstream press have been deliberately seeking to manipulate elections just as Hillary accused Putin when she lost. Currently, there are two lawsuits identical to each other. There is no honor left in media. CNN bragged how they were out to remove Trump from office. It has become fashionable to manipulate society to achieve a personal goal. In the process, they have destroyed the very fabric that holds a civilization together. We must accept that, for they have insured that the days of the United States are now numbered. There can be no return – they have burned all the bridges. 

Edward Gibbon wrote of him: 

Each “distinction of every kind soon became criminal. The possession of wealth stimulated the diligence of the informers; rigid virtue implied a tacit censure of the irregularities of Commodus; … Suspicion was equivalent to proof; trial to condemnation. The execution of a considerable senator was attended with the death of all who might lament or revenge his fate; and when Commodus had once tasted human blood, he became incapable of pity or remorse”

(Book 1, Chapter 4).

We too are attacking the rich just as Roosevelt did in the Revenue Act of 1935, 49 Stat. 1014 (Aug. 30, 1935) which imposed a 75% wealth tax, When WWII took place and FDR suddenly realized he needed the very people he was waging war against – Chrysler, Boeing, DuPont, and JP Morgan Jr. The conviction rate in US Federal Court has exceeded the notorious count of Adolf Hiter, which was 90%. The US has reached 98-99% thanks to prosecutors and judges who turn a blind eye and worship victory at all costs.

What is interesting is that there are two lawsuits that have been filed challenging the violation of the oath of office. The first one was filed by Loy Brunson and is still pending in the Utah Federal Court. The second one was filed by Raland J. Brunson and has made it to the Supreme Court of the United States – Docket #22-380. It will be interesting, to say the least, if the Supreme Court agrees to hear the case.

Both lawsuits include defendants Pres. Biden, Harris, former V.P. Pence, and 385 members of congress for breaking their oath of office by voting AGAINST the proposition (that came from members of congress) to investigate the claims that there were enemies of the constitution who successfully rigged the election. He filed ProSe in the Supreme Court.

This is an interesting argument, but it will be even more earth-shattering if the Supreme Court actually takes the case and rules on the validity of taking an oath of office. How can you support, and defend, the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic if you refuse to even investigate the claim?

Brunson sought the relief to have all the defendants permanently removed from office, and not allowed to hold public office again. While in the strict sense of the oath, that would be a reasonable expectation. But we no longer live in such a world of actual honor and justice for all. The problem has been the redefining of the word “justice” which is not “Just Us” with a totally different meaning.

Ah, yes, a philanthropist who has been selflessly donating his wealth to improve the lives of people around the world . . .

Death Cult. https://t.co/6aa15FUNLP

— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) December 6, 2022

When did being a victim become the highest of values in the west? CARL BENJAMIN: The U.S. Civil Rights Act, 1964.

The guest is Carl Benjamin, who Wikipedia describes as 

a British far-right anti-feminist YouTuber and political commentator. A former member of the Eurosceptic right-wing UK Independence Party, he was one of its unsuccessful candidates for the South West England constituency in the 2019 European Parliament election

This is the reason why fascism exploded as it did.  Fascism was in response to the failures of communism to overthrow the capitalism.  Now the only place it really succeeded was in Russia in 1917 with Lenin overthrowing the provisional government.  But it was the communist revolutionary who got imprisoned by the fascists, called Gramsci, Antonio Gramsci, who said that that's only happened in Russia because Russia is a deeply corrupt country where the people do not support the institutions of government.  So they didn't care if they got overthrown by a small organized minority.  And he accurately, I think, said, or pointed out in his Prison Notebooks, this is not going to happen in the west, somewhere like the United States, Canada, or England, where the institutions are by and large not corrupt and the people uphold them because the people believe the institutions are the best they're going to get and they like them and they think they're important and sustain the world that we have around us.  And so from this, you have a small group of activists in academia, in Harvard Law School, they call themselves the Critical Legal Scholars initially, but they ended up turning themselves into something called the Race Crits, the Critical Race Theorists.  This began with Dereck Bell's alternative course, where they were teaching what would come to be called The Intersectional View of Society, essentially a great expansion of Marxism out of the economic sphere into every other sphere of life.  In her earliest essays, Kimberle Crenshaw, she's the person who coined "intersectionality."  In 1989, she gives her essays these really long titles, and I can really remember, "A Black Feminist Critique of Liberal Human Rights."  In this one essay, she analyzes three particular American Supreme Court decisions, pointing out that what's happening here is that she believes, as a black woman, she has identified a problem, an absence in American Human liberal rights doctrine, which is, for example, when a pair of black women were denied a promotion in a company, a helicopter company, they were being discriminated against by the people above them, the judge ruled, for being as either women or as either black.  So a black man could be discriminated on the basis that he was black, but, of course, he had a privilege because he was a man.  A white woman could be discriminated against on the fact that she was a woman but had some sort of privilege because she was white, claiming that this was a gap in human rights law.  All intersectionality does is chain these together.  That says, what about a black woman who isn't privileged in either one of these ways but is discriminated against both of these ways.  That, in fact, she has a worse level of discrimination, and things are worse for her, and as soon as you start taking on this attitude, you realize that, oh, this is a key weakness in human liberal rights doctrine because what they're doing is staying within the paradigm and essentially warping it into something it's not intended to be.  From this, she writes an essay in 1991, called "Mapping the Margins," where she continues to expound this point of view.  This is where the intersectionality is properly formulated.  And in the conclusion of that, she says, "Look, we can use . . . in this essay, she explicitly cites Gramsci, because Gramsci's position was look, we can't overthrow capitalism in the west while society is strong enough to support its institutions.  He has a nice way of framing it, "When we attack the state and it trembles, behind it is revealed a strong fortification, or rampart, of society.  He says that it's the society itself that we actually need to overthrow [interesting distinction] in order to be able to bring about communism.  Crenshaw says that's a great point, and that we can use this weakness in liberal human rights legislation to attack society itself by promoting minoritarian interests.  And what we can do is find the intersection between being black, being woman, being gay, being trans, all the other identity categories.  And she openly postulates in the conclusion to this essay, that we can form coalitions of marginalized groups in order to strengthen that political voice and hopefully overthrow the regime of white/CIS/hetero/patriarchal norm of capitalism in order to, using their own logic, in order to hopefully bring . . . it's always very speculative, in order to "might bring about a better future."  "Might"?  Brilliant.  Such a secure way of overthrowing society.  I think this is why it's been so unbelievably quick because they're using their own internal logic.  All they do is expand the concept to mean its antonym.  Take any concept.  Racism is at once a person's opinion, which is located in yourself, and it's also objective, outside of yourself, and there's no one person who is responsible for it.  So you've got two opinions, two definitions that are openly contradictory that have been compressed into the same thing and it allows them to pivot at any point.  

When did being a victim become the highest of values in the west?  The U.S. Civil Rights Act, 1964.