Monday, January 3, 2022

DR. ROBERT CALIFF: Biden's pick to head the FDA, made millions as a consultant for more than 12 pharmaceutical corporations . . .

Califf was FDA head under Obama back in 2015. The American Thinker does a good job of taking down Califf's background, but it's precisely the background that the deep state loves: therefore, he'll be appointed.

COVID has revealed that the FDA, the CDC, Fauci, the White House, and “science” are at odds with each other. The FDA desperately needs major reform and transparency surrounding hiring, drug safety, and new drug approvals. As commissioner under Obama, Califf made few or no noteworthy changes to the FDA and shows no signs of improving the record if re-appointed.

Califf arrived at the FDA in 2015 determined to modernize how the agency reviewed drug and device study data, but there is little evidence he achieved that goal:

  • When he learned that Obama had proposed him as commissioner, Califf removed his name from scientific articles he had written. Even if they were controversial and assuming they were truthful, he should have stuck by them. America needs an FDA commissioner who will stick to evidence-based science, even in the face of controversy.
  • Dr. Califf currently works full-time for Google’s “Alphabet” company (Google being the most evil company in the world, according to Ted Cruz). In 2019, he became head of medical strategy at Google parent company Alphabet Inc.

Dr. Califf in Bed With Big Pharma:

  • Dr. Califf has deeper ties to the pharmaceutical industry than any FDA commissioner in recent memory, and he lacks a public health background.
  • Dr. Califf founded the Duke Clinical Research Institute, which runs research trials for pharmaceutical companies and today has more than 1,200 employees.
  • At Duke, Dr. Califf actively solicited funding from Big Pharma and no record exists of Dr. Califf ever saying “no” to any pharmaceutical company that offered him money. America needs an unbiased, science-based commissioner without these conflicts, and someone who can stand up to Big Pharma and say “no.” Some of the drug companies he accepted money from have FDA violations and questionable or even upsetting behaviors when it comes to their claims and when it comes to their safety /regulatory records.
  • Hillary Clinton and the Clinton foundation have been heavily criticized for doing the same thing. She solicited significant donations as Secretary of State from anyone and everyone. Some of the countries from which Hillary Clinton accepted donations have appalling human rights records and even ties to terrorism. The Republicans threw a fit about Clinton but they didn’t seem to care about the appointment of Califf the first time around and haven’t yet raised these issues since his second appointment was proposed.
  • Bernie Sanders is opposed to Califf’s appointment because of his Big Pharma ties.
  • More than half (~63%) of Califf’s $320 million funding at Duke came from Big Pharma and has had decades-long ties to almost every big pharma company.
  • He has served as a paid consultant with (1) Merck Sharp & Dohme, (2) Johnson & Johnson, (3) GlaxoSmithKline, (4) AstraZeneca, (5) Eli Lilly (6) Amgen, (7) F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, (8) Janssen Pharmaceutica, (9) Daiichi Sankyo, (10) Sanofi-Aventis, (11) Bristol-Myers Squibb, (12) Proventys, Inc, (13) Regado Biosciences, Inc, and (14) Corgentech Inc. (15) Genentech
  • Forbes wrote that his close ties to the drug industry were the reason for him not being nominated for the FDA Commissioner position in 2009.
  • Due to Califf’s big pharma conflicts, he would be unable to serve on an FDA advisory committee, yet democrats are proposing Calif for a third tour of duty at the FDA, where he previously served as the deputy commissioner and then the commissioner.

UNGOVERNABLE: OLD PARLIAMENT HOUSE IN AUSTRALIA SET ON FIRE

"A massive military vaccination experiment was conducted in Fort Riley, Kansas."

WW1 U.S. soldiers were given 14–25 untested, experimental vaccines within days of each other, which triggered intensified cases of ALL the diseases at once.

The doctors called it a new disease and proceeded to suppress the symptoms with additional drugs or vaccines. 

An autopsy done after the war proved that the 1918 flu was not a ‘flu’. It was instead the disease caused by the experimental ‘bacterial meningitis vaccine’ which was given to the people.

History tells us that the Spanish Flu in 1918 killed between 50-100 million people. It was considered the most horrifying disease by medical and pharmaceutical sources. It is a wartime myth still being perpetuated to cover up the experimental military vaccines which killed millions during the Spanish Flu.

Eleanor McBean, Ph.D., N.D., the author of Vaccinated Condemned by All Competent Doctors, Book I, 1981 describes her personal and family experiences during the 1918 "Spanish Flu" pandemic in detail in her book,  

She goes by the marketing name of Elben.

The coverage by McBean who is an unvaccinated survivor will let you revisit this historical event. McBean provides evidence that the historical events of the 1918 “Spanish Flu” were compromised.

The same was done with the Polio and Swine Flu epidemics and which is also being done now.

MYTH OF THE SPANISH FLU

Since Spain was neutral during World War 1, it did not hesitate to report the 1918 Flu epidemic, unlike the combatting countries.

So, Spain was ‘scapegoated’ as the source and hence the name ‘Spanish Flu’ was coined.

A massive military vaccination experiment was conducted in Fort Riley, Kansas – where the first “Spanish Flu” case was reported.

For the first time, the pharmaceutical industry got the supply of human test subjects which was sponsored by the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research.

The US military supplied a pool of 6 million men as test subjects for the vaccination experiments.

WW1 U.S. soldiers were given 14–25 untested, experimental vaccines within days of each other, which triggered intensified cases of ALL the diseases at once.

The doctors called it a new disease and proceeded to suppress the symptoms with additional drugs or vaccines.  



An autopsy done after the war proved that the 1918 flu was not a ‘flu’. It was instead the disease caused by the experimental ‘bacterial meningitis vaccine’ which was given to the people.

This disease mimics the symptoms just as flu. A large number of vaccinated soldiers were killed by this experimental vaccine and those who were not vaccinated were not affected.

BUT WHAT ABOUT THE CIVILIANS?

Huge quantities of unused experimental vaccines were left unused as WW1 ended abruptly.

The US government started the campaign of spreading fear among the civilians saying that when the soldiers will return to their families the disease will spread to the family members as well.

And by doing this they succeeded in using tens of millions of civilians as test subjects for experimental vaccines. As a result, millions of civilians died after wartime, just as the soldiers did.

Hence instead of reducing the risk, it intensified the situation and it was termed as the great ‘Spanish Flu of 1918’ in which only the vaccinated died.

Seven men dropped dead in a doctor’s office after being vaccinated. Letters were sent to their families that they had been killed in action.  --Eleanor McBean, Minnesota Wellness Directory

Recently, in a similar fashion, the WHO’s oral vaccine sparked a Polio outbreak in Africa.

A week after World Health Organisation (WHO) declared that its decade-long vaccination campaign in Africa was successful, its own oral vaccine itself sparked a new Polio outbreak in the continent. The outbreak was been caused by a mutation of strain in the vaccine.

THE COVID NARRATIVE

Neil Ferguson is the British scientist and professor at The Imperial College, who developed mathematical pandemic computer models for covid-19 based on which national policies were drafted.

However, all the models provided by Neil Ferguson have proven to be misleading and still, the world is following his COVID-19 model.

For instance, as per the Ferguson model, Sweden would experience 100,000 deaths by June 2020 but Sweden peaked only at 2854 deaths total till now (as of writing this article).

The case of Sweden is interesting because the strict lockdowns prescribed by the WHO were not implemented by the Swedish government. The Swedish Model has proven the ineffectiveness of WHO COVID policies.

There’s also the case of Germany where the federal minister hired scientists to develop a fake coronavirus model to justify strict lockdowns.

After a strong fight by activists and lawyers, the German court in a landmark ruling declared COVID19 lockdowns imposed by the government were unconstitutional.

WHO’s policies on the type of drug for treatment of COVID-19 were also exposed to be influenced by fake data by a pornstar and a science fiction writer.

The fake corona models were further complemented with faulty test protocols.

As GreatGameIndia reported earlier, the standard coronavirus tests threw up a huge number of positive cases daily. These tests are done based on faulty WHO protocols which are designed to include false positives cases as well.

It was only a year later when the pandemic was already declared strict lockdowns imposed worldwide that the WHO admitted its mistake and changed its RT-PCR test criteria.

Last year, a Portuguese appeals court had ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test.

The threshold cycles used in PCR tests in India is between 37 and 40, which makes the reliability of the PCR test less than 3% and the false positive rate as high as 97%.

Earlier, the WHO’s testing protocol was even questioned by Finland’s national health authority. WHO had called on countries to test as many patients as possible for coronavirus.

In a startling disclosure, Finland’s head of health security, Mika Salminen dismissed the WHO advisory saying the WHO doesn’t understand pandemics and that their Coronavirus testing protocol is illogical and doesn’t work.

The H1N1 pandemic occurred in 2009

So, if the WHO’s testing protocols are indeed based on the most reliable, accurate, and well-sourced technologies and research methodologies available worldwide, shouldn’t they have known about its negligible effectiveness and its impact in causing panic and chaos?

Indeed the WHO knows it doesn’t work and moreover this is not the first time such criticisms have been voiced.

In the past in 2010, the WHO was caught faking a pandemic and was forced to admit that its methodology of measuring the virality or the spread of the disease, instead of its severity was incorrect.

We need your support to carry on our independent and investigative research-based journalism on the Deep State threats facing humanity. Your contribution however small helps us keep afloat. Kindly consider supporting GreatGameIndia.

Sunday, January 2, 2022

TEXAS BEAT BIDEN AGAIN: COURT: “It is undisputed that an agency cannot act without Congressional authorization.”

AMSTERDAM: PROTESTORS MAULED BY POLICE DOGS