IT'S NOT ABOUT SAFETY; IT'S ABOUT SOCIAL ENGINEERING

Thank you, Bill Sardi.

"The press is obsessed with keeping young people unemployed and preventing young people from enjoying life"

The United States is one of the few countries in the world where plasma donors are paid and it is responsible for 70% of the global supply of plasma

This was written by Alex Tabbarok and posted at Marginal Revolution.  

The United States is one of the few countries in the world where plasma donors are paid and it is responsible for 70% of the global supply of plasma. If you add in the other countries that allow donors to be paid, including Germany, Austria, Hungary, and Czechia, the paid-donor countries account for nearly 90% of the total supply.

Countries that follow the WHOs guidance to rely exclusively on voluntary, unpaid donors all have shortages of plasma (hmmm…what’s the WHOs track record like?) So what do these countries do? Import plasma from the paid-donor countries. The United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand and some Canadian provinces, for example, prohibit paid donors and they import a majority of their plasma from paid donor countries. (See chart at right).

As Nobel prize winner Al Roth puts it, in his gentle way:

I find confusing the position of some countries that compensating domestic plasma donors is immoral, but filling the resulting shortage by purchasing plasma from the US is ok.

The UK, Australia, New Zealand and Canada can afford their moral hypocrisy but their decision to forbid paid-donors reduces the world supply of plasma driving up the price and harming people in poorer countries.

I have cribbed from an excellent new report by Peter Jaworski, Bloody Well Pay Them: The Case for Voluntary Remunerated Plasma Collections.

Thanks to Robert Wenzel's "The Case of Blood for Money" for bringing this important fact to my attention.

BILL GATES

 

Thanks to Charles Burris at LRC.

COVID-19: Genocide of the Old and Sick

Mass media, government

The gov't of Italy foolishly responded by sending sick people into nursing homes.  

Bloomberg's Tomara Remondini and Marco Bertacche wrote that in Italy "99% of Those Who Died from CoronaVirus Had Other Illnesses, Italy Says."  That's a Bloomberg headline.  So it's not like some organs of the major media and some journalists aren't trying to set the record straight.  It's just that the connected media, CNN, ABC News, etc. generally explode their stories on the scene with general hysteria anyway that almost any story sounds like it's an epidemic of some sort.  

The folks dying with the Coronavirus were already very sick.  And putting sick people into a nursing home where you've already got sick people is a recipe for disaster, a situation that anyone would recognize as dangerous except for Governors Cuomo of New York, Whitmar of Michigan, Newsome of California, and the governor of Washington state.  

There was never any reason to think that this virus was a threat to young, productive, working-age citizens.  

The idea was that sooner or later, people were going to get exposed to the CoronaVirus and that by locking down the entire population, the government thought that they could slow down the spread of the virus.  But the reality is that outside from a few locations, like New York City, there never was a major surge.  Check out this chart.  To me, it is the most damning of evidence as to where the "hotspots" or dangerous zones are: 

Thanks to Robert Wenzel for the article where this image is found.  Check out the share of deaths from Coronavirus in nursing homes.  

And then there was this:

This is a holocaust of the elderly and sick.  Thanks to Daniel McAdams' piece "COVID-19: Genocide of the Old and Sick."  It's not the young, the productive, or healthy working people who are dying.  If that's the case, then why is it the young who are complying to the letter of the recommendations with things like social distancing or wearing masks?  Masks cover up smiles.  They make a person seem threatening.  Think of doctors or surgeons.  These guys are not your friends.