Friday, October 21, 2022

DR. RUSSELL BLAYLOCK'S PROTOCOL

This article, "Vaccines and the Myth of Herd Immunity," explains the hazards of vaccines that no one knew about . . . except Dr. Russell Blaylock.  

When I make comments like these, I get scoffed at. 

Worse are the States, such as Massachusetts, New Jersey and Maryland, where forced vaccinations have either been mandated by the courts, the state legislature, or have such legislation pending. All of such policies strongly resemble those policies found in National Socialist empires, Stalinist countries, or Communist China. 

The pro-vax pundits, prostitutes, and shills kept harping on herd immunity, which translated means that they vax proponents wanted a large percentage of society vaccinated, like 95% to 100%.  Herd immunity applies only to natural immunity, not to herd immunity by vaccination.  Fauci has served the American people with propaganda that is absolutely demonic.  Men in the old days would have physically taken care of business.  Where are the soldiers today?  Making sure that we have enough tampons in the men's bathroom on the military bases?

When pressed further, they then resort to their favorite justification, the Holy Grail of the vaccine proponents – herd immunity. This concept is based upon the idea that 95% (and some now say 100%) of the population must be vaccinated to prevent an epidemic. The percentages needing vaccination grows progressively. I pondered this question for some time before the answer hit me. Herd immunity is mostly a myth and applies only to natural immunity – that is, contracting the infection itself.

 


Contrast These Two Impressions. Melinda French Gates: the Pinnacle of Moral Virtue?

Though I'd like a little more evidence than the headline provides regarding who made the COVID vaccine, it is in the zeitgeist.  It is out.  It is in the culture.  We're all in tune to the malfeasance.    

So we're supposed to believe that the gals giving the psychopathic sneer is somehow appalled by Bill Gates' sexual indiscretions?  That somehow her stalwart bravery from the emotional turmoil of a divorce is supposed to reconcile the psychopathic nature?  I've got some beach front property on the dark side of the moon that you might be interested in . . . a real bargain.

I find it funny that Melinda Gates could possibly have any morals or ethics given her expression in this clip.  Remember when she announced her divorce on CBS to Gayle King back in March 2022.  Her journey in healing?  Melinda French Gates?  Melinda French Gates?  I have to say that the photos presented in the interview give me the impression that the woman in the interview is not Melinda Gates.  Conspiracy stuff, I know.  But take a careful look for yourself.  The face of the woman in the interview is swollen.  Would that be the face of a billionaire?  Really.  And then in her replies, she squints and scrunches her face and moves side to side to avoid full front facial and you only get a profile view to distort it to animate it and distract but also to obscure the fact that they could be two different faces.  

KING, 1:58:  There was one report that said it was multiple affairs.  Do you care to say anything about that?

GATES:  You know, I think those are questions that Bill needs to answer for that. 

KING:  It was also widely reported that Bill had a friendship or business or some kind of contact with Jeffrey Epstein and that you were not . . . that was very upsetting to you.  Did that play a role in the divorce at all . . . in this process?  


GATES:  Yeah, as I said, it's not one thing, it was many things, but I did not like that he'd had meetings with Jeffrey Epstein, no.  And I made that clear to him.  I also met Jeffrey Epstein, exactly one time.  [putting up the index finger to emphasize the frequency of her meeting with Jeffrey Epstein, given how her hands have been clasped throughout, is suspicious to me.]  Yes, because I wanted to see who this man was.  And I regretted it from the second I stepped in the door.  

[Most people go "through doors," not "in the door."]  So here she is trying to assert some higher moral credibility.

GATES, 2:44  He was abhorrent.  He was evil personified.  I had nightmares about it afterwards, so my heart breaks for these young women, because that's how I felt and here I am an older woman.  My God, I felt terrible for those young women.  It was awful.   

KING, 3:03 And you shared that with Bill, and he continued to spend time with him?  

GATES, 3:07  Any of the questions remaining about what Bill's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein was, those are for Bill to answer.  [So here we're given the impression that Gayle gently presses only to be rebuffed by Melinda to which Gayle gently retreats on the sharper questions.  We're supposed to think that it is the delicate nature of the topic that forces King to retreat.  No, this is bad acting and bad script writing.] 

FDA advisory board member, Kim Witczak. COVID shined a light on so much corruption w/in pharma, govts & public health agencies

Ms. Witczak, so far, reads a lot like a bona fide advocate for quality control in the drug industry.  Surprised that someone like her even exists.  She's got some good resources here.  I didn't like this video.  The interviewer and Ms. Witczak both seem to be too mild in their criticism of the logistics of the vaccines, the ethics, or rationale for them.  I am glad that she's on the good side of history.  That makes her a good egg. 

This is about getting it on the schedule, because now the companies have immunity with the product.  Any injuries or death wen through a different court, the Vaccine Injury court.  

This recent move by the CDC to authorize the COVID vaccines for kids is really about the liability protections than it is about providing any benefit to kids or to pile on the controversies surrounding vaccines.  


KANSAS CITY: WOMAN MURDERS FIRE FIGHTER, SHOOTING HIM IN THE BACK; JUDGE DECLARES IT SELF-DEFENSE

BREAKING REPORT: Steve Bannon SENTENCED TO 4 MONTHS and a $6,500 fine...