Wednesday, February 17, 2016

". . . a high fat, low carb diet may not only be best for weight loss, but also for reducing several markers of cardiovascular risk in the obese."
". . . athletes . . . can get their energy from ketones, not glucose."
Cardiologist, Dr. Aseem Malhotra, explains why fat is the best medicine.

For decades, we were told that eating fat would lead us to early grave. Horror stories of clogged arteries and coronaries were the norm, while foods such as pasta were seen as healthy.
This is true.  But where did people get this story that eating fat was dangerous and eating refined grains, like pasta, was the healthy alternative for us? 


Answer: Ansel Keys.

But research is increasingly disproving this theory--and sugar is now public enemy number one.

Where has he been?  Hel-lo.

In fact, fat is good for us and should be our medicine, claims cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra, who is based in Surrey.
He says a mounting slew of evidence suggests that far from contributing to heart problems, having full fat dairy in your diet may actually protect you from heart disease and type 2 diabetes.  

There are other, better fats besides "full fat dairy."  Coconut oil and coconut butter are some of the best fats; they have the highest content of saturated fats--you know--those fats that help you repair and feel better. 
Here, writing for Men's Health, he explains his controversial view... 
This morning, as I do most days, I breakfasted on a three egg omelette cooked in coconut oil, with a whole milk coffee.I enjoyed a wedge of full fat cheese with my lunch, poured a liberal dose of olive oil on my evening salad and snacked on nuts throughout the day. 
In short, I ingested a fair amount of fat and, as a cardiologist who has treated thousands of people with heart disease, this may seem a particularly peculiar way to behave. 
Fat, after all, furs up our arteries and piles on the pounds–-or at least that’s what prevailing medical and dietary advice has had us believe.

That may be true but there seems to be a better way to dispel the myths than to joke about people's old fears, which are the result of a decades' long campaign against fat.
As a result, most of us have spent years eschewing full fat foods for their ‘low fat’ equivalents, in the hope it will leave us fitter and healthier.
Yet I’m now convinced we have instead been doing untold damage: far from being the best thing for health or weight loss, a low fat diet is the opposite. 
In fact, I would go so far as to say the change in dietary advice in 1977 to restrict the amount of fat we were eating helped to fuel the obesity epidemic unfolding today.

Okay.  I agree.  Where's the proof? 
Far from being the enemy, fat is good for us and should be our medicine, claims Dr Malhotra.
It’s a bold statement, but one I believe is upheld by an array of recent research.

Totally agree.  Fat is more important than protein.  Certain when it comes to bones, collagen, which can be found in Vitamin C-rich foods like fruits and vegetables, is more important than calcium in rebuilding structure and function.  

WHY I ENCOURAGE MY PATIENTS TO EAT FAT

These days I make a point of telling my patients – many of whom are coping with debilitating heart problems – to avoid anything bearing the label ‘low fat’. 
This is good but like I said after years of being brainwashed, how are these people going to feel confident about going ahead with foods that were previously treated as taboo?

Better instead, I tell them, to embrace full fat dairy and other saturated fats within the context of a healthy eating plan. 
It’s an instruction that is sometimes greeted with open-mouthed astonishment, along with my request to steer clear of anything that promises to reduce cholesterol – another of those edicts we are told can promote optimum heart and artery health.
As we will see, the reality is far more nuanced: in some cases lowering cholesterol levels can actually increase cardiovascular death and mortality, while in healthy people over 60 a higher cholesterol is associated with a lower risk of mortality. Why, exactly, we will come to later.
First though, let me make it clear that until very recently, I too assumed that keeping fat to a minimum was the key to keeping healthy and trim.
That doesn't seem too helpful to tell his patients that he too was duped. "I thought that you were smarter than me, Doctor?" is what I would think. He may want to reconsider that statement, but simply provide a list of benefits to his patients with a list of evidentiary proof.
In fact, to say my diet revolved around carbohydrates - sugared cereal, toast and orange juice for breakfast, a panini for lunch and pasta for dinner was not an uncommon daily menu.
Good solid fuel, or so I thought, especially as I am a keen sportsman and runner. 
Still, I had a wedge of fat round my stomach which no amount of football and running seemed to shift.
That, though, wasn’t the reason I started to explore changing what I ate. 
Yeah, I think it was Gary Taubes who made the argument that exercise simply makes people hungry.  So exercise by itself without a change in one's diet is fairly useless in reducing that spare tire around your waist.  

THE TOXIC TRUTH ABOUT SUGAR
That process started in 2012, when I read a paper called ‘The Toxic Truth About Sugar," by Robert Lustig, [February 02, 2012,] in the science journal Nature.
In it, Lustig, a Professor of Paediatrics who also works at the University of California’sCenter for Obesity Assessment, said the dangers to human health caused by added sugar were such that products packed with it should carry the same warnings as alcohol. 
It was an eye-opener: as a doctor I already knew too much of anything is bad for you, but here was someone telling us that something most of ate unthinkingly every day was, slowly, killing us.
Okay, sure is bad for you.  How is that news?  I mean in the old days prior to the ubiquity of sodas and fruit juices, getting a tasty treat was something that kids did at the local five-and-dime store.  This is not news but it is definitely important information.
The more I looked into it, the more it became abundantly clear to me that it was sugar, not fat, which was causing so many of our problems.
Okay, this is an important distinction for people to make regarding how and why they are getting fat.  Step one, reduce or eliminate the sugar. Step two, increase your fat intake.  But which fat?  Aha, that is the $64 question.
This is why, along with a group of fellow medical specialists, I launched the lobbying group Action on Sugar last year with the aim of persuading the food industry to reduce added sugar in processed foods.
Good luck with that one.  The "industry" will simply rename things, tell you its fruit juice when it is juice from the sugar cane plant.  I mean they have their ways.  If they're profitable, do you really think the food industry is going to comply with an edict to change their recipe?  Don't make me laugh.
I would go so far as to say the change in dietary advice in 1977 to restrict the amount of fat we were eating helped to fuel the obesity epidemic unfolding today
He's right.  It has.  All in the name of reducing fat, of course. 
Then earlier this year I had another light-bulb moment. 
Oh, this room is wild with lights now.
In February Karen Thomson, the granddaughter of pioneering heart transplant surgeon Christian Barnard, and Timothy Noakes, a highly-respected Professor of Exercise and Sports Medicine at the University of Cape Town, invited me to speak at the world’s first ‘low carb’ summit in South Africa. 
I was intrigued, particularly as the conference hosts are both fascinating characters. 
A former model, Ms Thomson has courageously battled a number of addictions including alcohol and cocaine, but lately it is another powder – one she labels ‘pure, white and deadly’ – that has resulted in her opening the world’s first carbohydrate and sugar addiction rehab clinic in Cape Town.
Professor Noakes, meanwhile, has recently performed a remarkable U-turn on the very dietary advice he himself expounded for most of his illustrious career: that is, that athletes need to load up on carbohydrates to enhance performance. 
A marathon runner, he was considered the poster boy for high carbohydrate diets for athletes – then he developed type 2 diabetes. 
THE TERRIFYING LINK BETWEEN SUGAR AND DISEASE Effectively tearing pages out of his own textbook, Professor Noakes has now said athletes – and this goes for those of us who like to jog around the park too – can get their energy from ketones, not glucose. 
That is, from fat not sugar.
Alongside them were 15 international speakers ranging from doctors, academics and health campaigners who between them produced an eloquent and evidence-based demolition of 'low fat' thinking – as well as suggesting that it is carbohydrate consumption, not fatty foods, which is fuelling our obesity epidemic.
As one scientist said: 'You don’t get fat from eating fatty foods, just as you don’t turn green from eating green vegetables'Opening the conference was Gary Taubes, a former Harvard physicist who wrote The Diet Delusion, in which he argued that it is refined carbohydrates that are responsible for heart disease, diabetes, obesity, cancer, and many other of our Western maladies. 
The book caused controversy when it was released seven years ago, but his message is finally gaining traction.
And that message is this: obesity is not about how many calories we eat, but what we eat. 
Refined carbohydrates fuel the over production of insulin, which in turn promotes fat storage. 
In other words: it’s not calories from fat themselves that are the problem. It’s a robust message that was reinforced time and again at the conference. 
Take Swedish family physician Dr Andreas Eenfeldt, who runs the country’s most popular health blog Diet Doctor. 
In his home country, studies show that up to twenty three per cent of the population are embracing a high fat, low carbohydrate diet. 
A ticking time bomb you might think – but contrary to expectations, while obesity rates are soaring everywhere else, they are now starting to show a decline there.
More research on this correlation is yet to be done – but in the meantime The Swedish Council on Health Technology has made its position clear. 
After a two-year review involving 16 scientists, it concluded that a high fat, low carb diet may not only be best for weight loss, but also for reducing several markers of cardiovascular risk in the obese.
A mounting slew of evidence suggests that far from contributing to heart problems, having full fat dairy in your diet may actually protect you from heart disease and type 2 diabetes
In short, as Dr Eenfeldt told the conference: ‘You don’t get fat from eating fatty foods just as you don’t turn green from eating green vegetables.’
This, of course, is a difficult message for many to swallow; particularly for heart patients, most of whom have spent years pursuing a low fat, low cholesterol diet as the best way to preserve heart health.
It’s a public health message that was first promoted in the sixties, after the globally respected Framingham Heart study sanctified high cholesterol as a major risk factor for heart disease. 
It’s a cornerstone of government and public health messages – yet what people didn’t know was that the study also threw up some more complex statistics. 
Like this one: for every 1mg/dl per year drop in cholesterol levels in those who took part in the study there was a 14 per cent increase in cardiovascular death and an 11 per cent increase in mortality in the following 18 years for those aged over 50.It’s not the only statistic that doesn’t sit with the prevailing anti-cholesterol message. 
THE LINK BETWEEN FAT AND CHOLESTEROL                         In 2013, a group of academics studied previously unpublished data from a seminal study done in the early seventies, known as the Sydney Diet Heart study. 
They discovered cardiac patients who replaced butter with margarine had an increased mortality, despite a 13 per cent reduction in total cholesterol. 
And the Honolulu heart study published in the Lancet in 2001 concluded that in the over-sixties a high total cholesterol is inversely associated with risk of death. 
Startling, isn’t it? A lower cholesterol is not in itself the mark of success, it only works in parallel with other important markers, like a shrinking waist size and diminishing blood markers for diabetes.
Conversely, a mounting slew of evidence suggests that far from contributing to heart problems, having full fat dairy in your diet may actually protect you from heart disease and type 2 diabetes. 
What most people fail to understand is that, when it comes to diet, it’s the polyphenols and omega 3 fatty acids abundant in extra virgin olive oil, nuts, fatty fish and vegetables that help to rapidly reduce thrombosis and inflammation independent of changes in cholesterol. 
Yet full fat dairy has remained demonised – until now.In 2014, two Cambridge Medical Research Council studies concluded that the saturated fats in the blood stream that came from dairy products were inversely associated with type 2 diabetes and heart disease. 
Meaning that in moderate amounts – no-one is talking about devouring a cheese board in one sitting here – cheese is actually a proponent of good health and longevity. 
The same study, incidentally, found that the consumption of starch, sugar and alcohol encourages the production of fatty acids made by the liver that correlate with an increased risk of these killer diseases.
HOW CARBS HAVE WRECKED THE HEALTH OF DIABETICS    It is around type 2 diabetes, in fact, that the anti-fat pro-carb message of recent decades has done some of the greatest damage. 
A lot of patients suffering from type 2 diabetes-–the most common kind –-are labouring under the dangerous misapprehension that a low fat, starchy carbohydrate fuelled diet will help their medication work most effectively. 
They couldn’t be more wrong. 
Earlier this year, a critical review in the respected journal Nutrition concluded that dietary carbohydrate restriction is one of the most effective interventions for reducing features of metabolic syndrome
To protect your heart, ditch low-fat spread for butter or, better still, a bottle of extra virgin olive oil
It would be better to rename type 2 diabetes 'carbohydrate intolerance disease'.
Try telling this to the public though. 
Like the man who called into a national radio show in Cape Town on which I was taking part to discuss the relationship between diet and heart disease. 
Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, he was under the impression he had to consume sugar so his diabetes medications could ‘work’ – when in fact it was going to worsen his symptoms. 
And how many doctors and patients know that although some of these medications to control blood sugar may marginally reduce the risk of developing kidney disease, eye disease and neuropathy, they don’t actually have any impact on heart attack, stroke risk or reduce death rates? 
In fact, overmedicating on diabetes drugs is actually causing dangerously low blood sugar levels.
This is responsible for approximately 100,000 emergency room visits per year in the United States.
But who can blame the public for such misguided perceptions? In my opinion a perfect storm of biased research funding, biased reporting in the media and commercial conflicts of interest have contributed to an epidemic of misinformed doctors and misinformed patients. 
The result is a nation of over-medicated sugar addicts who are eating and pill-popping their way to years of misery with chronic debilitating diseases and an early grave.
It’s why, these days, I very seldom touch bread, have got rid of all added sugars and have embraced full fat as part of my varied Mediterranean-inspired diet. 
I feel better, have more energy and – even though I didn’t set out to do so – I’ve lost that fatty tyre around my waist, despite reducing the time I spend exercising.
Perhaps you can’t face making all those changes in one go. In which case, if you do one thing, make it this: next time you are in the supermarket and are tempted to pick up a pack of low-fat spread, buy a pack of butter instead or, better still, a bottle of extra virgin olive oil. 
Your heart will thank you for it. 
The father of modern medicine Hippocrates once said, 'let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food'. 
It’s now time we let 'fat' be that medicine.
Dr Aseem Malhotra is a cardiologist and advisor to the National Obesity Forum.  @DrAseemMalhotra.  He is currently crowdfunding for his documentary film 'The Pioppi Protocol – 21 days to whole heart health'.  
This article originally appeared on and has been reproduced with the permission of Men's HealthRead more:
The truth about fat and sugar is finally explained - Men's Health

Saturday, February 13, 2016

U.S. Intel Chief Admits, "[We] may use the "Internet of Things" to spy on you."



The "Internet of Things" promises consumers convenience in use, convenience in payment, probably even options for discounts. But know this, that if each and everyone of your household appliances is plugged into the internet or the cloud or the world wide web, know that these appliances, your appliances, will be used against you. Sound familiar? Where have you heard that phrase before? By law enforcement and by our vaunted legal system. While some groups [click on that link] have pointed to the health hazards associated with the new smart meters, perhaps these very folks are playing the role of controlled opposition, whereby the arguments that oppose any harmful effects win the day against the whistle blowers tooting the horn about radiation poisoning. And as those points go unfounded or unproven, forgotten or defeated, then people take fewer actions and worry less as they become more complacent, rendering them more malleable to further incursions into prying of one's homes via the "Internet of Things."



There is one woman who warned us early on about the government's role in not only spying on Americans, but to know everything about you . . . without your permission, of course. Dr. Katherine Albrecht, Ed.D., was the first person I'd read about ten years ago now who sounded the alarm on RFID tags. 
Executive Technology Magazine has called Katherine "perhaps the country's single most vocal privacy advocate" and Wired magazine calls her the "Erin Brockovich" of RFID". Her success exposing corporate misdeeds has earned her accolades from Advertising Age and Business Week and caused pundits to label her a PR genius.

Thursday, February 11, 2016

DESTROY ALL PATHOGENS IN DONATED BLOOD

". . . technology to inactivate nearly all pathogens in donated blood exists—and [has] for over a decade." 


from Wired . . .

Giving blood is a reminder that human are sacks of microbes, and blood is a very good way to spread the nasty ones. Have you ever used needles to take drugs? the questionnaires probe. Had a tattoo? Lived with a person who has hepatitis? And even if you’ve done none of the above, you could still have some new virus no one ever thought to ask about. Like Zika. Last week, Brazil reported its first cases of Zika transmission via blood transfusion.

But that’s preventable, even the new viruses. The technology to inactivate nearly all pathogens in donated blood exists—and it’s existed for over a decade.

In Europe, blood banks have been using Cerus’s Intercept system for platelets and blood plasma transfusions since the early 2000s. In 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration finally approved the system in the US. And this week, Cerus announced a partnership with the American Red Cross, the single largest supplier of blood products in the US.

In a time of Zika and chikungunya and other once obscure viruses creeping through the Americas, a system that can knock out all pathogens, known or unknown, makes sense. “It is not practical to keep adding a new test every time some emerging disease comes along,” says Jed Gorlin, medical director of Memorial Blood Centers in Minnesota. “We cannot possibly keep up.” The American Red Cross’s battery of current tests, used on all donated blood, includes six viruses, including HIV and hepatitis B and C. Each additional test adds somewhere around several dollars per unit of blood.

The system especially makes sense in places where wide-spread diseases threaten the safety of the blood supply. In Puerto Rico, where the chikungunya virus is prevalent, the Red Cross has already been testing Intercept in the blood supply. And if it’s widely implemented in the US, the system would certainly ease the minds of hyper-vigilant blood recipients in mosquito-friendly climates. But the killer app for a system like Intercept may not have to do with viruses but bacteria. It’s all about the money. To understand that, it helps to understand how Intercept works.

Intercept exploits a simple distinction: The useful components of donated blood—platelets, plasma, and red blood cells—do not contain any DNA or RNA. Bacteria, viruses, parasites, and even white blood cells, which are dangerous when transfused into immunosuppressed patients, do. Blood banks add a molecule called amotosalen to bags of platelets or plasma, and the molecule binds to the DNA or RNA when activated with UV light. The amotosalen is like a lock that prevents pathogens from replicating. Any extra amotosalen is then filtered out. The whole process takes just a few minutes.

Keep reading . . .

Tuesday, February 9, 2016

Your Lymphatic System: A Place Where Impurities Reside
 

THE LYMPHATIC SYSTEM: WHAT IS IT?
The lymphatic system primarily consists of lymphatic vessels, which are similar to the circulatory system's veins and capillaries. The vessels are connected to lymph nodes, where the lymph is filtered. The tonsils, adenoids, spleen and thymus are all part of the lymphatic system.

Your lymphatic system is essentially your immune system.  All of the organs involved in the lymphatic system work to produce white blood cells to fight off infection.  
The spleen, which is located on the left side of the body just above the kidney, is the largest lymphatic organ, according to the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM). It controls the amount of red blood cells and blood storage in the body, and helps to fight infection. If the spleen detects potentially dangerous bacteria, viruses, or other microorganisms in the blood, it — along with the lymph nodes — creates white blood cells called lymphocytes, which act as defenders against invaders. The lymphocytes produce antibodies to kill the foreign microorganisms and stop infections from spreading. Humans can live without a spleen, although people who have lost their spleen to disease or injury are more prone to infections.
Your tonsils are part of your lymphatic system.  Why do doctors insist upon having them removed?  They certainly should not be removed.  If they are swollen and infected, simply take Vitamin C, bring the swelling down and diminish the viral load of the infection.  Seems to me to be pretty easy.  But "doctors know best" I guess.  Uh, they don't.  If they're just following orders from their medical school days then they are just boobus. 

Tonsils are large clusters of lymphatic cells found in the pharynx. According to the American Academy of Otolaryngology, they are the body's "first line of defense as part of the immune system. They sample bacteria and viruses that enter the body through the mouth or nose." They sometimes become infected, and although tonsillectomies occur much less frequently today then they did in the 1950s, it is still among the most common operations performed and typically follows frequent throat infections.

SYMPTOMS of LYMPHATIC CONGESTION [good video here too]
Rings get tight on fingers
Soreness and/or stiffness in the morning
Feeling tired
Bloating
Itchy skin
Holding on to water
[for women only: Breast swelling or soreness with each cycle]
Dry skin
Brain fog
Cold hands and feet

FOOD REMEDIES for YOUR LYMPHATIC SYSTEM
The standard approach to your lymphatic system sounds like it is one of detoxing.  Yeah, since your lymphatic system is your immune system and it ain't working well, it means that you're chronically ill. There are foods and herbs to repair this condition and get your lymph system up to par.  Sydney Ross Singer suggests eating raw foods as one of the approaches to detoxing the lymph system.  I agree to a point.  One or two servings a day perhaps.  But your body really does well when foods are cooked.  Absorption is better.  His other suggestions I like.

Michelle Schoffro Cook recommends astragalus, echinacea, goldenseal or wild indigo root tea, though she doesn't explain why these particular teas improve the lymph system. 

Lynette Hingle recommends similar herbs. "Use herbs to clean out your lymphatic system. Dandelion root, yellow dock root, burdock root, goldenseal, nettles, parsley and myrrh cleanse your lymphatic system, says DetoxSafely.org."  In addition to these herbs, she also recommends the following "Eat natural foods that cleanse your lymphatic system. Some lymphatic cleansing foods are dark green vegetables, ginger, sea kelp, citrus fruits such as lemons and oranges, flax seeds, wheatgrass juice, radishes and garlic."

She adds some pretty sound advice on what to avoid:

Avoid processed foods. Processed foods put a strain on your lymphatic system, says DetoxSafely.org. Avoid white bread, candy, processed meats such as luncheon meats and hot dogs, fast foods, canned foods and packaged dinners, cereals and baked goods.