Stop thinking about the ethnic replacement of your people across the entire globe, that's racist. pic.twitter.com/coCLFtmExz
— Caulin (@caulin001) December 1, 2025
GET NUTRITION FROM FARM-DIRECT, CHEMICAL-FREE, UNPROCESSED ANIMAL PROTEIN. SUPPLEMENT WITH VITAMINS. TAKE EXTRA WHEN NECESSARY
Monday, December 1, 2025
CAULIN: ETHNIC REPLACEMENT OF WHITES, 1960-2025
AMY MEK: This Isn’t Immigration - It’s Hijrah: The Islamic Command to Migrate Into Non-Muslim Nations and Transform Them
π¨ ALERT AMERICA π¨
— Amy Mek (@AmyMek) December 1, 2025
This Isn’t Immigration - It’s Hijrah: The Islamic Command to Migrate Into Non-Muslim Nations and Transform Them
The Islamic Expansion Strategy Behind the Migration Wave No One Will Acknowledge
Most non-Muslims have no idea that Islamic doctrine commands… https://t.co/bjJGGKH1MK
This Isn’t Immigration - It’s Hijrah: The Islamic Command to Migrate Into Non-Muslim Nations and Transform Them
The Islamic Expansion Strategy Behind the Migration Wave No One Will Acknowledge
Most non-Muslims have no idea that Islamic doctrine commands Muslims to migrate into non-Muslim nations, not to assimilate, not for charity, but as a religious duty with long-term civilizational goals.
Not to assimilate.
Not for humanitarian reasons.
Not for “opportunity.”
They are commanded to migrate for a religious, ideological, and civilizational purpose.
And that command has a name:
Hijrah
Hijrah is Islam’s model of moving from Muslim lands into non-Muslim countries in order to expand Islam demographically, culturally, and politically with the long-term goal of transforming the host society from within.
This doctrine is rooted in Muhammad’s move from Mecca to Medina, a migration that shifted political power, established the first Islamic state, and changed the region forever.
Under Islamic teaching, Hijrah is not symbolic nor optional. It is treated as a religious duty.
The Qur’an commands:
“Whoever emigrates for the cause of Allah will find on earth many locations and abundance.” (Qur’an 4:100)
Muhammad reinforced this:
“I charge you with five: to assemble, to listen, to obey, to immigrate, and to wage jihad for the sake of Allah.”
This is why Hijrah is understood within Islamic law as:
•a commanded migration into non-Muslim lands
•a strategy of demographic expansion
•a pre-jihad preparation phase
•and a method for shifting political power inside host nations
So when Western governments and federally funded refugee contractors flood American towns with unvetted arrivals from Islamic war zones, they’re not just “helping people.”
They are enabling a doctrinal system that has been used for 1,400 years to reshape societies from within.
Not a single Islamic refugee should be resettled in our country. Not one.
There are 57 Islamic nations prepared to welcome them. America is not required to become the 58th.
Hijrah is real.
Its purpose is clear.
And Americans must understand what it means, before the transformation is complete.
JOHN GUANDOLO: Why do we have a standing Navy [1784] in our Constitution? Why do we have letters of marque that authorized private citizens to fight on behalf of the United States? Because of the Muslims.
Muslims declare war on America in 1801 because they refuse to continue paying the JIZYA @JGuandolo54271 https://t.co/q60RuMYyWO pic.twitter.com/LTMVMwyDnM
— Bob (@Shariakill) September 2, 2025
Why do we have a standing Navy [1784] in our Constitution? Why do we have letters of marque that authorized private citizens to fight on behalf of the United States? Because of the Muslims. Because they were seizing our ships on the seas and capturing our citizens. John Adams [and Thomas Jefferson] met with the Ambassador from Tripoli to the United Kingdom [in 1786], to Great Britain, and they asked him, "Why are you taking, seizing U.S. ships, and why are you kidnapping American citizens and holding them for ransom for tribute?"
At the time [1800], the United States government was paying a quarter, a quarter, of our national income to Muslim nations for tribute. Well, the ambassador to Great Britain from Tripoli answered Adams and Jefferson [president, 1801-1809] as to why and they recorded his response in a letter to the Continental Congress which is today obviously kept in the Library of Congress, and Jefferson and Adams [recorded] this.
Islam was founded on the laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Quran that all nations who should not have acknowledged their Authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Muslim who should be slain in battle was sure to go to paradise. --Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja, Tripoli Ambassador to Britain Official Communique to U.S. Congress, 1786.
This is what this Muslim told Thomas Jefferson and John Adams which is interesting because this is exactly what Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State Hezbollah and Hamas and all Suburban book Haram and Islamic Jihad and all the others Jihadi groups tell us the reason that they're fighting today so our Founders had direct contact with this. And what's interesting is that the first war America fought after the American Revolution was against who? The Muslims.
from Salty Texan,
I was just reading about the conversation and reporting back to the new Congress of John Adam’s and Thomas Jefferson on the topic of the Barbary pirates demands. Jefferson and John Adams went to call on Tripoli’s envoy to London, Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman. They asked him by what right he extorted money and took slaves in this way. As Jefferson later reported to Secretary of State John Jay, and to the Congress:
“The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.” Medieval as it is, this has a modern ring to it. Abdrahaman did not fail to add that a commission paid directly to Tripoli—and another paid to himself—would secure some temporary lenience. I believe on the evidence that it was at this moment that Jefferson decided to make war on the Muslim states of North Africa as soon as the opportunity presented itself. And, even if I am wrong, we can be sure that the dispatch of the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps to the Barbary shore was the first and most important act of his presidency. It took several years of bombardment before the practice of kidnap and piracy and slavery was put down, but put down it was, Quranic justification or not. (Source: Jefferson’s Quran Slate 2007)
First Barbary War, 1801-1805
from Steve Taylor Australis on the creation of the U.S. Navy based on threats from Muslims on the high seas.
ERIC DAUGHERTY: Minnesota NGO gets over $2K per Somalian they successfully import into the country
π¨ HOLY CRAP! Minnesota NGO gets over $2K per Somalian they successfully import into the country
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) December 1, 2025
"They don't integrate into our societies. They carry over their clan mentalities."
Time to BAN Somalian migration so the money stops! pic.twitter.com/uIDEmpX7hK
πΊπΈπΈπ΄ MINNESOTA SOMALIS GO FULL SHARIA ON CAMERA: REFUSE ENGLISH, BAN WOMEN FROM SPEAKING, DEMAND VIDEO DELETION
— Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) November 28, 2025
Nick Shirley asked a simple question in America’s heartland: “What’s it like being Muslim here?”
The response? Zero interest in dialogue, total control mode… pic.twitter.com/PzBDYRm5Uw
CHRISTIAN PETERSON: πΈπͺ Multiculturalism was added into the Swedish constitution in 1975 (Prop. 1975:26) under Olof Palme — no referendum, no long-term review. A turning point no one voted for.
— Sputnik (@Sputnik3333333) December 1, 2025
πΈπͺ Multiculturalism was added into the Swedish constitution in 1975 (Prop. 1975:26) under Olof Palme — no referendum, no long-term review.
— Christian Peterson πΈπͺ (English) (@christianpet_) November 22, 2025
50 years later: mass migration, record gun violence, parallel societies, major demographic shifts.
A turning point no one voted for. pic.twitter.com/U8oI4UOJpx